Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

esson Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 13:53, Dian Ågesson mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz> > wrote: Hello, Things have escalated somewhat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 13:53, Dian Ågesson wrote: > Hello, > > Things have escalated somewhat: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118091243 > Yeah, we now have the situation where turn left slip lanes have been mapped as sudden sharp angles, rather than gradual turns, which just looks

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

I agree that the ways should only be split for a physical separation, and turn lanes should use turn:lanes and legality of changing lanes change:lanes as Thorsten points out. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

Hello, Things have escalated somewhat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118091243 (There has definitely been something lost in translation, as this change isn't an example of what I was speaking to the editor about.) As Kim said, I'm not talking about the marginal cases. These

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

***physically*** Legal lane change restrictions are tagged with change:lanes From: Graeme Fitzpatrick Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2022 08:58 To: Luke Stewart Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections Looking

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

Personally, for shallow slip lanes like this, I map with the angle of the island and do not make curves where it joins the new road. On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 10:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Continuing on with that line of thought & looking at the example mentioned > in the other thread: >

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

Continuing on with that line of thought & looking at the example mentioned in the other thread: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-31.99548/115.99338 How should that left turn from Tonkin Hwy to Hale Rd be mapped? As a relatively smooth curve the way it is now, or as an abrupt 45° angle

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

Looking back at the notes from the previous discussion & spotted this comment: "only split the way at the point where you can no longer physically change lanes." Physically, or legally? Looking at the Princes Hwy/William Rd example, yes,

[talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

(forgot to x-post to talk-au) Hi, The standard rule and the way that I map is to only begin a new way if there is some form a physical separation, so extra turning ways which can be completed with a box but are modelled as curves aren't following this rule (same goes for ways that start when