@openstreetmap.org
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks Stephen
In regards to item 10, the photo that I have referenced is from the
intersection of Granite and Abrahams tracks, which is un marked(no
sign), only wheel ruts/indents in the grass to indicate
Thanks Stephen
In regards to item 10, the photo that I have referenced is from the
intersection of Granite and Abrahams tracks, which is un marked(no
sign), only wheel ruts/indents in the grass to indicate the
intersection.
Yes, I looked there today and I can't see any signs either.
If
the access/use requirements are.
Stephen.
Sent:Monday, August 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM
From:fors...@ozonline.com.au
To:talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Hi all
Thanks for the delay while I contacted Parks Vic. Parks Vic have
confirmed
Hi all
Thanks for the delay while I contacted Parks Vic. Parks Vic have
confirmed that Ant Trail is closed to the public for all uses as is
the trail at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-37.93253/145.30901
stev391 proposed that my edit should be reverted as he says:
(1) The track is
fors...@ozonline.com.au schrieb:
Hi
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in national
and state parks?
For example, Ant Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do not
create
Hi all
I only got to speak briefly with the Head Ranger today. I request a
further week delay in the decision on the tagging of Ant Trail.
Thanks
Tony
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Agree with most things you said Stev...
But for the copyright map thing. 'We' should not be using copyright maps
for anything in OSM. I do use copyright maps .. usually for planning
trips ... along with OSM or course. Once the trip is completed I use my
trip generated knowledge to add/improve
I agree David,
Hence why these tracks were left just as highway=path
Stephen.
Sent:Monday, August 10, 2015 at 2:11 PM
From:David Clark dbcl...@fastmail.com.au
To:talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
I come acrosssimilar
...@obviously.com
TO: fors...@ozonline.com.au
CC: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
SUBJECT: Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks It
physically exists, and therefore I view it as legitimate in OSM. But
access=no is not quite the right twist on things.It really belongs to
a much larger
@openstreetmaptalk-au@openstreetmap.org
SUBJECT: Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national
parks It physically exists, and therefore I view it as
legitimate in OSM. But access=no is not quite the right twist on
things.It really belongs to a much larger category of unofficial
SOMEONE
(PARK RANGER) SAID TO LIMIT THEIR LEGAL LIABILITY. STEPHEN. SENT:
Friday, August 07, 2015 at 10:51 AM
FROM: Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
TO: fors...@ozonline.com.au
CC: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
SUBJECT: Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks It
physically
)).
Thanks.
Stephen.
Sent:Monday, August 10, 2015 at 12:25 PM
From:fors...@ozonline.com.au
To:stev...@email.com
Cc:talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks stev391 and others for the feedback and the welcome.
Re real world
, however the original author might.
These are just my views, always happy to consider other views.
Steve.
-Original message- Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 03:52:28
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject:
Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
...@ozonline.com.au
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks for the replies
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked off.
Parks Vic prefers light handed regulation so I used mild language to
describe the track status.
http
: Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 03:52:28
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks for the replies
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked off.
Parks Vic prefers light handed regulation so I used mild
Hi
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in
national and state parks?
For example, Ant Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do not
create additional trails and only use
On 30/07/2015 10:20 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in
national and state parks?
For example, Ant Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike
If the path exists then shouldn't it be tagged access=no + foot=yes?
From:fors...@ozonline.com.au fors...@ozonline.com.au
Date:Thu, 30 Jul, 2015 at 11:53
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks for the replies
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked
I lean towards mapping what's physically there, so if the trail exists I
think it's ok to map it if you want to.
If the trail is blocked by a fence/barrier and signage saying keep out
etc, then I think access=no would be appropriate as it's facts based on
what's physically there.
I also
The access issues get very murchy very quickly.
We have a Forestry area that is clearly signposted for bikes to stick
to vehicle tracks, however for 10 years or more Forestry has sponsored
volunteer mountain bikers to build and maintain trails in this area.
Go figure.
Parks have a category for
Hi
We have much the same issue with walking tracks and old surveying/mining roads
is Tasmania. Parks has played a very dominating roll with Tasmapi it is
actually dangerous as you can be standing on a made road/track and as it does
not appear on the map you can get confused and lost. Also
On 30 July 2015 at 11:52, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked off.
Parks Vic prefers light handed regulation so I used mild language to
describe the track status.
On 7/29/2015 6:52 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Possibly tag it access=no and rename it to Track closed depending on
how widely the name Ant Track is known. It may be known as Ant Track
by a very small group of riders.
The name might not be Ant Track, but it's almost certainly not Track
On 30 July 2015 at 10:20, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do not
create additional trails and only use official trails. They would prefer if
such unofficial trails were not mapped or named because it implies official
status to
24 matches
Mail list logo
