Thanks Stephen
In regards to item 10, the photo that I have referenced is from the intersection of Granite and Abrahams tracks, which is un marked(no sign), only wheel ruts/indents in the grass to indicate the intersection.
Yes, I looked there today and I can't see any signs either.
If I understood correctly, the access requirements you have described for Ant Track, are better suited to an access=no tag, vs the individual tagging of uses currently applied. (This is in line with the signs on the entry to the park and the description of a formed track from your email below.) That is my 2 cents, not fussed either way, just prefered it to be clear what the access/use requirements are.
Yes, I agree, it should be tagged access=no. (This was always my preference, I think the confusion was over what was allowed vs what was enforced. The signage is clear and now I have clear advice from Parks.)
I propose that the bicycle=no horse=no tags be removed from Ant Trail and that Ant Trail and the trail at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-37.93253/145.30901 both be tagged access=no
Thanks Tony _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
