any particular source then
it should discounted out of hand. If people have to visit every single
street on the planet, then so be it - that's the fun part of the project
anyway.
80n
On Feb 11, 2008 9:29 PM, Ian Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reckon
are not going to run out of unmapped space any time
soon.
80n
Or fix the coastline. There's still lots of areas where the coastline is
not accurate and needs to be fixed up.
Anyway just my 2c's.
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:34 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
You could use OSMXapi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Osmxap
something like:
http://xapi.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/[bbox=lefthttp://xapi.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/%5Bbbox=left,
bottom,right,top]way[highway=*]
to be
good mapping at the moment will get improved over time as better technology
and better sources come along.
A straight line between two places is better than no line.
80n
The other issue is a potentially nastier one, especially given that
landsat supports something approximating
That looks good, but...
penStreetMap
It's not obvious to the layman that the magnifying glass is supposed to be
an O. And because pen is a common word many people will misread this as
penStreetMap which makes about as much sense as OpenStreetMap if you've
never heard of either.
I'd strongly
then they will stop accepting contributions on that site unless
you agree to the new terms (the OSMF Contributor Terms).
This is likely to be disruptive.
80n
Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the proposed new
licence.
It is designed around European law, and gives database
, but the timescale is also
undefined. This is designed to win by attrition.
No matter how slow the uptake eventually the CC-BY-SA content will be
insignificant.
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
known entries missing, please add them.
LWG has put out a request for this earlier, but it may not have
reached talk-au shores.
Grant
What's the lower limit for inclusion on this list? It says rather vaguely
more than a few hundred nodes.
80n
Regards
Grant
This page is more
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
On 23 July 2010 00:08, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalog
*snip*
Grant
What's the lower limit for inclusion on this list? It says rather
vaguely
more than
users need to be very careful about modifying existing CC
only licensed work, which includes almost everything that is already in OSM,
don't they?
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
damages etc? Is this compatible with section 6.2 of the Contributor
Terms? If I understand it right 6.2 excludes any liability. Isn't this
contrary to Geogratis's stipulation in 4.3?
Can you explain please?
80n
[1] http://geogratis.cgdi.gc.ca/geogratis/en/licence.jsp
the recipient or even how that satisfies
the claim in the CTs that OSMF agrees to attribute You.
Can you explain please?
80n
Regards
Grant
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:48 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 15:12 -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OSMF is a democratically elected body. Candidates welcome. I guess
2011's
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:49 AM, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 24/04/11 19:54, John Smith wrote:
Once upon a time it used to be almost a race to map out new areas from
Nearmap coverage, now whole areas of coverage go untouched for months
or longer...
Even from bing there is not
process and will result in fosm being
degraded needlessly. We've talked about mechanisms for watching areas where
this might happen and for users who might be doing this. We can revert such
edits in fosm and get the good stuff back providing we notice that it has
happened.
80n
go on, but those are the big ticket items.
Everyone should be aware of the theater show that 80n is running merely to
disrupt the community, and it's very sad that so far he's been successful.
You seem worried, Steve.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
I personally cannot seem to be able to get any joy from fosm.org, at
the moment I am just getting a 500 Internal Server Error message.
Me too.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 September 2011 19:49, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
That reminds me.. I've just updated the name of the Princess Highway
through Engadine based on the signed name via ground survey. I've made
the
?
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
what they think they've granted as a right,
rather than what permissions you think they've given.
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
hand documentary evidence for any claim, either
way, to have any value.
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew, that's great that you've had a response from AGIMO.
Yes it is, I made sure to thank them for this.
Would it be possible for you to share
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.comwrote:
On 27 September 2011 12:09, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Andrew.
I wonder if Grant received a similar answer but interpreted it in a
different way. Grant?
Hi 80n, yes the responses
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 27 September 2011 12:09, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Andrew.
I wonder if Grant received a similar answer but interpreted
reason that
you can't then you need to explain yourself.
80n
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
guessing.
Based on the reply that I received from Grant, he appears to have no
intention of providing any information to back up his claims.
It's over a month since he was asked to provide the supporting evidence. I
think we can conclude that he doesn't have it.
80n
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Chris Barham cbar...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 19:51, waldo000...@gmail.com
waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
+1. Surely forwarding the emails is less work for you anyway than
transcribing parts of the emails (?!).
Did you consider why
27 matches
Mail list logo
