Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

2017-02-18 Thread Warin
More Problems 1) Source .. the source tags can be in the relation and not the way ... Change the way to the new source and yet the other relations all say it is some other source. My conclusion is that the source should be on the way. 2) Are the other relations, that refer to this way,

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

2017-02-18 Thread nwastra
…..Actually, all the overlapping ways in the current shapefile are where adjacent relations meet. > On 19 Feb 2017, at 2:04 PM, nwastra wrote: > > Hi > is there a JOSM plugin to assist with duplicate ways? > > We have been given explicit permission to use a good data set of

[OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

2017-02-18 Thread nwastra
Hi is there a JOSM plugin to assist with duplicate ways? We have been given explicit permission to use a good data set of shapefiles that define boundaries for the OSM. Using JOSM, my method is to select the shapefile relation for a particular National Park for instance then merge the

Re: [Talk-it] mappatura armadi telefonici

2017-02-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 18 Feb 2017, at 19:04, Andrea Solari wrote: > > Ciao > qualcuno ha iniziato a mappare gli armadi telefonici Tim/Telecom per la > fibra ottica? si: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/457644 ciao, Martin

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread Philippe Verdy
I'm not speaking about how German or Spanish version are produced or even if there are reviewers on the English version. For now there's a clear lack of actual translators for French and all this is google-like translated with too much non-sense. Also I spoke about the selection of topics when it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
2017-02-18 21:10 GMT+01:00 Philippe Verdy : Et c'est encore plus vrai pour WeeklyOSM quand la source originale n'est en > fait même pas l'anglais (souvent l'allemand, l'espagnol ou le russe), et où > la version anglais proposée comme source est en fait une traduction >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread JB
Bon ben comme ça, on a un non-lecteur non-traducteur qui n'est pas d'accord avec les autres. Il serait non-au-courant, ça arrangerait juste tout le monde. C'était mon mauvais esprit du soir, bon week-end, JB. Le 18/02/2017 à 21:10, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Le 18 février 2017 à 15:47, Julien

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread osm . sanspourriel
Bonjour, Je croyais que Philippe répondait à mon message et j'étais choqué car il reprenait une partie en sortant du contexte. En fait non, je n'avais pas expédié mon message et on est presque d'accord, du moins sur la conclusion.. oui c'est imparfait mais ce n'est pas parce que c'est

Re: [Talk-it] Ferrovie su mappa Wikipedia

2017-02-18 Thread Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi
Il giorno sab, 18/02/2017 alle 20.40 +0100, girarsi_liste ha scritto: > > Sembra che qualcuno abbia messo mano alle coordinate oggi: > > https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ferrovia_Fano-Urbino=86014952=86012117 > > Probabile che i rimpristini abbiano in qualche modo modificato le >

Re: [Talk-it] mappatura armadi telefonici

2017-02-18 Thread Volker Schmidt
per favore non mappateli, sono troppi. Qui a Padova ci sono ad ogni incrocia circa 5 armadi di operatori diversi, tutti collegati allo stesso cavo multifibra sotterraneo. E fra poco arriva anche ENEL per posare nuovi cavi multifibra e probabilmente anche nuovi armadi. On 18 February 2017 at

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread Philippe Verdy
Le 18 février 2017 à 15:47, Julien Coupey a écrit : > Comme ça a été dit, il vaut mieux une version française limitée que pas de > version du tout. > Pas d'accord quand ça consiste juste à copier-coller directement le contenu d'une traduction automatique SANS la relire et la

Re: [Talk-it] Ferrovie su mappa Wikipedia

2017-02-18 Thread girarsi_liste
Il 18/02/2017 18:08, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi ha scritto: > Mi segnalano che sulla mappa Wikipedia i tracciati delle ferrovie > venivano mostrati fino a qualche giorno fa ma ora non più. Esempio: > https://tools.wmflabs.org/wiwosm/osm-on-ol/kml-on-ol.php?lang=it=Ferrovia_Fano-Urbino > Nel menù in

[Talk-it] mappatura armadi telefonici

2017-02-18 Thread Andrea Solari
Ciao qualcuno ha iniziato a mappare gli armadi telefonici Tim/Telecom per la fibra ottica? esempi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet#Street_cabinet_categories https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop saluti andrea

Re: [Talk-GB] London, network=Barclays Cycle Hire

2017-02-18 Thread Phillip Barnett
+1 for simplifying name. Adding the name of 'sponsor of the week' adds nothing to the utility of the map, and just means extra work for no benefit. We are under no obligation to promote the sponsor. > On 18 Feb 2017, at 12:43, Philip Barnes wrote: > > I see no problem

[Talk-cz] body zachrany

2017-02-18 Thread Jáchym Čepický
Ahoj, máme v databázi nějak evidované tzv. body záchrany - rescue points ? http://www.hzscr.cz/clanek/body-zachrany-na-uzemi-cr.aspx Na mapy.cz jsou J -- Jachym Cepicky e-mail: jachym.cepi...@gmail.com twitter: @jachymc ___ Talk-cz mailing list

[Talk-it] Ferrovie su mappa Wikipedia

2017-02-18 Thread Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi
Mi segnalano che sulla mappa Wikipedia i tracciati delle ferrovie venivano mostrati fino a qualche giorno fa ma ora non più. Esempio: https://tools.wmflabs.org/wiwosm/osm-on-ol/kml-on-ol.php?lang=it=Ferrovia_Fano-Urbino Nel menù in alto a destra dice "OSM objects (not found)". Ho visto che fa così

Re: [Talk-it] Divieto escrementi animali.

2017-02-18 Thread girarsi_liste
Il 14/02/2017 18:15, Paolo Monegato ha scritto: > Visto che c'è il contenitore però più che un divieto alle povere > bestiole (che tra l'altro avrebbe poco senso) si tratta di un segnale > che obbliga il padrone a raccogliere... Quindi imho il valore più che > "no" dovrebbe essere un altro che

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Tomas Straupis
2017-02-18 16:26 GMT+02:00 Dave F wrote: > Why do you believe this to be a problem? It may be pointless, but not an > error. As I pointed out there is no problem with geometry. So yes, it is not an error. But import(?) with lots of errors in ETL or source data. -- Tomas

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Notes pollutie

2017-02-18 Thread Marc Gemis
2017-02-18 15:33 GMT+01:00 Philippe Casteleyn : > Ik heb toch al geschreven dat ik stop in Brussel omdat ik er niet > gemakkelijk meer kan werken bedoel je nu dat die notes het moeilijk maken om te werken ? Je kan die notes toch heel gemakkelijk afzetten met een

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Notes pollutie

2017-02-18 Thread Matthijs Melissen
2017-02-18 15:33 GMT+01:00 Philippe Casteleyn : > Iedereen spreekt altijd over lokale kennis, maar verkiest toch buitenlandse > inmenging. Een kleine opheldering, met 'lokale kennis' wordt bedoeld kennis van iemand die ter plaatse is geweest om te kijken hoe de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] HebdoOSM

2017-02-18 Thread Julien Coupey
Bonjour Merci pour vos retours et avis, et merci à ceux qui se sont proposés pour donner un coup de main ! Je tente une rapide synthèse : * la remontée d'infos francophones est cruciale (aspect objectivement sous-estimé pour l'instant par rapport à la traduction pure). Il faut essayer de

[OSM-talk-be] Notes pollutie

2017-02-18 Thread Philippe Casteleyn
Het is toch niet zo erg iemand "dictator" te noemen ? Ik heb mij nog ingehouden [] Wees blij dat er nog mensen zijn die paard en kar durven noemen. Wat is dat tegenwoordig toch met al dat verplicht positivisme ! Ik heb toch al geschreven dat ik stop in Brussel omdat ik er niet gemakkelijk

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Dave F
Hi Why do you believe this to be a problem? It may be pointless, but not an error. I need to point out none of these given examples are multi-polygons. DaveF On 18/02/2017 11:37, Tomas Straupis wrote: Another interesting example are polygons like this:

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2017-02-18 12:37, Tomas Straupis wrote: Another interesting example are polygons like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400182030 Polygon geometry is fine here, but it has one pointless node close to one of the nodes. Pointless because it does not influence the final geometry of the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réparer un carnage

2017-02-18 Thread osm . sanspourriel
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Madagascar_tagging_guidelines#R.C3.A9seau_routier Pour expliquer aux contributeurs comment taguer les routes à Madagascar. Jean-Yvon ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] London, network=Barclays Cycle Hire

2017-02-18 Thread Philip Barnes
I see no problem with this edit, however should we keep changing the name of the sponsor, or should we be even more bold and simply call it London Cycle Hire, or similar, in the same way the BBC refer to the FA Cup rather than the name of the sponsor it happens to have this year? My 2 pence

Re: [Talk-it] MAPPA IMMAGINE DI SFONDO

2017-02-18 Thread THESTORM375
No ma lo sapevo già che gli URL di Google sono sbagliati e non ho mai avuto intenzione di usarli ... vedremo cosa potrò fare .. grazie a tutti ☺ Il Ven 17 Feb 2017 15:23 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > 2017-02-16 23:19 GMT+01:00 Francesco Pelullo

[Talk-GB] London, network=Barclays Cycle Hire

2017-02-18 Thread Dan S
Hi all, Exactly 1 year ago, Harry pointed out that most of London's bike hire scheme was still tagged as "Barclays Cycle Hire" even though it's not called that any more. He said: "I think

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] blog.openstreetmap.nl

2017-02-18 Thread Hugo Hölscher
Is de blog soms slachtoffer van het recent ontdekte lek in PHPMailer? Er is overigens een patch on het lek te dichten. Groet Hugo Op 18 feb. 2017 12:24 schreef "Stefan de Konink" : > Ps maar als er een vrijwilliger komt die het in de lucht wil gaan houden, >> ga uwes ganges

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Tomas Straupis
Another interesting example are polygons like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400182030 Polygon geometry is fine here, but it has one pointless node close to one of the nodes. Pointless because it does not influence the final geometry of the polygon. And if you look around there

Re: [OSM-talk] Maproulette problems?

2017-02-18 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2017-02-18 12:18, Jochen Topf wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:48:08AM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote: Is the back-end of Maproulette offline? I can access the site, I can see the challenges and the metrics, but when I want to start a challenge I only get to see the OSM map in my neighborhood

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Notes pollutie in Brussel

2017-02-18 Thread Karel Adams
Helemaal gelijk Glenn, ik zat ook al te broeden op een antwoord in die zin maar ik zou het niet beter kunnen verwoorden. Karel On 17/02/17 11:52, Glenn Plas wrote: Mr Casteleyn, Dit is de 2de maal dat u iemand persoonlijk aanvalt, en 2 maal dezelfde persoon over een paar notes die u niet

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] blog.openstreetmap.nl

2017-02-18 Thread Stefan de Konink
Ps maar als er een vrijwilliger komt die het in de lucht wil gaan houden, ga uwes ganges en draag het over. Ik heb nog wat liefde gegeven aan de wordpress installatie. Hij is nog niet weg. -- Stefan ___ Talk-nl mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:26:42AM +, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 18/02/2017 10:15, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > >After Europe was fixed in <24h it seems i started to wade through Africa > >and i am seeing some error class which makes me wonder is somebody did > >some large scale autonomous

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Tomas Straupis wrote: > >> There are literally hundrets of building which have 4 edges as nodes > >> but them beeing connected over cross so that a construct like a > >> butterfly resembles. > > > > Any chance of a link to an example? > > I guess

Re: [OSM-talk] Maproulette problems?

2017-02-18 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:48:08AM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote: > Is the back-end of Maproulette offline? I can access the site, I can see the > challenges and the metrics, but when I want to start a challenge I only get > to see the OSM map in my neighborhood and it doesn't assign a task. It does

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Tomas Straupis
>> There are literally hundrets of building which have 4 edges as nodes >> but them beeing connected over cross so that a construct like a >> butterfly resembles. > > Any chance of a link to an example? I guess Florian ment geometries like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460032394

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Andy Townsend
On 18/02/2017 10:15, Florian Lohoff wrote: After Europe was fixed in <24h it seems i started to wade through Africa and i am seeing some error class which makes me wonder is somebody did some large scale autonomous Aerial scan for buildings. There are literally hundrets of building which have

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:20:53PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > Yesterday I launched several Maproulette challenges that allow you to > easily help with the "cleaning up" effort. Read > http://area.jochentopf.com/fixing.html for more details on those > Maproulette challenges. This is a huge effort

Re: [Talk-cz] (no subject)

2017-02-18 Thread Marián Kyral
Ahoj, už by to mělo fungovat. A budu se muset podívat na tu vrstvu chybných rozcestníku. Taky to je nějaké rozbité :-( Ale k tomu se dostanu asi až zítra večer. Marian 18. února 2017 7:55:56 SEČ, "Marián Kyral" napsal: >Dne 18.2.2017 v 07:10 Zdeněk Pražák napsal(a): >>

[OSM-talk] Maproulette problems?

2017-02-18 Thread Maarten Deen
Is the back-end of Maproulette offline? I can access the site, I can see the challenges and the metrics, but when I want to start a challenge I only get to see the OSM map in my neighborhood and it doesn't assign a task. Also: there is no contact information? Is this the best way to get in

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

2017-02-18 Thread Oleksiy Muzalyev
On 18.02.17 08:43, Jochen Topf wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:50:07AM +0100, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: On 15.02.17 23:51, Sarah Hoffmann wrote: ... we are currently discussing about changing the algorithm that assembles the polygons[1]. The new algorithms will be a lot faster but that comes

Re: [OSM-talk-be] heiligenbeelden

2017-02-18 Thread Jakka
Deze info nog gevonden: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcross http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:summit:cross%3Dyes Op 17/02/2017 om 18:31