Hi Phil
My old 1280x720 was setup for a rear quarter view for traffic sign
capture. I was advised that the angle and shutter raster delay (slant)
made detection problematic so I don't upload. I will however give it a
try at 90 degrees. It's a USB webcam
On 8/5/19 9:44 am, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Thanks Andrew
I capture at 2fps with a BlackVue (via 30fps mp4). That was
unfortunately a hard choice to do with the cost of the Internet
connection. 5fps would have been nicer. Road name signs are then
problematic not only from the framerate perspective, but that
compression artefacts glug
is there any articles on what does/doesn't get used on particular zoom
levels? just figure it wouldn't hurt to double check my general
understanding
On 5/7/19 1:21 PM, Russ Garrett wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 12:40, Martin Wynne wrote:
I don't know anyone who would say "I see a residential
the way I see it, what osm is for... is whatever people want to use it
for really. to me, osm is great because you can achieve a detail like no
other, if you see a problem, you can either fix it there and then, or
mark it for fixing later a lot better than say for example google where
they
On 5/8/19 7:44 AM, Phil Wyatt wrote:
One thing that is useful in small towns is a cruise around the main and back
streets with a camera at 90 degrees (I shoot over the road from the
drivers side) to capture shop fronts etc. This can be useful for
business points - the local butcher, hardware
Hi Bob,
You're doing some great work with collecting imagery data with Mapillary.
We really appreciate that sort of data available for armchair mapping.
I'd love to meet up for a coffee when you are back up in Armidale, and talk
about your data collection process. I've been meaning to try and
Merci pour la vraie traduction ;)
(tu sais, les traducteurs automatiques ont fait de gros progrès depuis
babelfish :p)
--
deuzeffe
On 07/05/2019 23:57, Vincent Privat wrote:
Je viens de traduire pour de vrai en français ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/don-vip/diary/210953
ça doit
Am 07.05.19 um 22:26 schrieb liberalerhuman...@wikipedia.at:
> Man könnte die Postleitzahlen recht einfach aus Wikidata importieren.
Wikidata ist eine Quelle, von denen wir bei OSM definitiv die Finger
lassen sollten. Die Kollegen besorgen sich von überall Daten her, wobei
deren Lizenzen sehr oft
Je viens de traduire pour de vrai en français ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/don-vip/diary/210953
ça doit être un peu mieux que deepl :)
Le mar. 7 mai 2019 à 21:09, deuzeffe a écrit :
> On 07/05/2019 00:08, Vincent Privat wrote:
> > L'article est là:
> >
Hi,
Servers now gone.
Kind regards,
Grant
On Tue, 7 May 2019, 21:28 Grant Slater, wrote:
> Hi OpenStreetMap NL,
>
> Would anyone like 4x HP DL360 G6 Servers?
> Example Specs:
> https://hardware.openstreetmap.org/servers/spike-02.openstreetmap.org/
>
> They are great reliable 1U servers and
> Je note que sur JOSM, crossing=island est proposé, crossing:island=yes
> n'est pas connu.
Oui en effet crossing=island est proposé comme attribut de passage
piéton (à tord donc d'après le wiki)
et traffic_calming=island l'est bien mais dans la rubrique
ralentisseurs, évidement.
J'ai
Merci Daniel, je vais consulter la documentation.
Pierre
Le mardi 7 mai 2019 16 h 06 min 40 s UTC−4, Begin Daniel
a écrit :
Tim, Pierre and all,
I have just published the documentation about orthogonalizing building
footprints on Github. People can then easily access it as it
My impression is that this mess arises because bus stops are
uni-directional and independent from the opposite direction. So we're used
to having them as separate entities to the side of the road.
Whereas tram stops are often in a single location for both directions (or
close enough), so we want
As far as I understood it, there are no practical pedestrian routing
concerns with any of the currently used schemes for pedestrian+PT
routing/directions. If this is incorrect can someone provide a
specific example?
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 16:18, john whelan wrote:
>
> So if we connect a bus_stop
Hi OpenStreetMap NL,
Would anyone like 4x HP DL360 G6 Servers?
Example Specs:
https://hardware.openstreetmap.org/servers/spike-02.openstreetmap.org/
They are great reliable 1U servers and served OpenStreetMap.org very
well for the last few years.
They are free. Collection is from Amsterdam at
Man könnte die Postleitzahlen recht einfach aus Wikidata importieren.MfG, LHAm 07.05.2019 9:02 nachm. schrieb wambac...@posteo.de:
Auch wenn es weh tut:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60719 beeinhaltet
wohl den aktuellen Stand.
Der auch hier
So if we connect a bus_stop to a highway with a path would that address the
routing concerns? Or is that idea too simple?
Thanks John
On Tue, May 7, 2019, 3:53 PM Jarek Piórkowski, wrote:
> Sorry, crossed my wires while editing at one point:
>
> > 9a. Because we must retain hw=bus_stop per #3
Tim, Pierre and all,
I have just published the documentation about orthogonalizing building
footprints on Github. People can then easily access it as it evolves. I have
made the code available with the test dataset proposed by Jarek.
So far, I have documented the different concepts behind the
Sorry, crossed my wires while editing at one point:
> 9a. Because we must retain hw=bus_stop per #3 and #5, any
> accommodation of these cases must either be initially of tags, or
> guidance on how to place highway=bus_stop tags
make that:
9a. Because we must retain hw=bus_stop per #3 and #5,
Ciao a tutti,
vi informo che la deadline per la sottomissione degli abstract per la Track
Accademica di State of the Map 2019 (Heidelberg, 21-23 settembre) è stata
prorogata al *19 maggio*.
A presto,
Marco
Il giorno mer 27 mar 2019 alle ore 15:19 Marco Minghini <
marco.minghin...@gmail.com> ha
Hi all,
I wrote some point-form notes of the discussion so far for people to
refer or respond to. I asked questions in 7a, 7c, 8c, 10c, 11c, 13b,
14.
1. Majority of world's public transit is buses
2. Majority of world's bus stops are simple signs (or sometimes no
signs at all) and will never [1]
On 07/05/2019 00:08, Vincent Privat wrote:
L'article est là:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/josmeditor/diary/172694
Et DeepL est mon ami ^^
Merci pour les infos claires et précises. Si j'ai bien compris,
MoetHennessy :)
--
deuzeffe
___
Hola!
Us escric perquè a xarxanet.org, portal de noticies dedicat a
l'associacionisme i el voluntariat, volem fer una noticia sobre
openstreetmap i les ong.
Necessitaria si us plau parlar amb algú de vosaltres dimecres o dijous.
Amb qui podria fer-ho?
Espero la vostra resposta,
gràcies
*Anna
Auch wenn es weh tut:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60719 beeinhaltet wohl
den aktuellen Stand.
Der auch hier bekannte Kollege hat sich zurückgezogen und seit dem
passiert wohl gar nix mehr.
Gruss,
Walter/Wiesbaden
ps: Wenn jemand aktuelle Grafiken braucht, bitte melden.
--
7 May 2019, 20:22 by ste...@stevenhorner.com:
> I imagine other Council's and public services have similar problems.
>
In Poland it turns out that there is no central fire hydrant database.
For obvious reasons this data is useful for firefighters.
Currently there is some infrastructure used by
Hi Norfolk mappers,
this is the confirmation for the OSM meeting to take place on Saturday,
11th May, 2pm.
I reserved a table in the Rumsey Wells Pub, 4 St. Andrews Street,
Norwich, NR2 4AF.
See you there :)
Jez - I did contact NorDev. Unfortunately no response yet. Might try the
other
(Ceci dit vous êtes la première personne francophone qui me parle d'un
retour d'expérience sur jlink, ça m'intéresserait si vous pouviez donner
votre avis technique en commentaire du ticket JOSM que j'ai cité).
Vincent
Le mar. 7 mai 2019 à 20:27, Vincent Privat a
écrit :
> Hello,
> Désolé
Hello,
Désolé d'avoir réagi aussi violemment, ce n'était pas justifié. ça
m'apprendra à écrire en étant très fatigué...
Merci à tous pour tous les retours de remerciement, ça fait plaisir :)
Pour les retours techniques sur les différents choix que nous faisons, à
savoir: changer le moins possible
I was thinking recently how my local council could use OpenStreetMap.
A couple of months ago I put a freedom of information request in to Durham
County Council in the hope of getting a full list of all Waste Bins in the
area with locations. I wanted to use this as a basis to survey for
7 May 2019, 14:30 by mar...@templot.com:
> This idea of primary and secondary tags is new to me. There is no such
> distinction in the iD editor -- all applied tags are simply listed in
> alphabetical order.
>
Primary tag in iD editor is one at the top, with an icon (selecting another
Hi all,
A quick update: Thanks for all your venue suggestions for the next OSM UK
annual general meeting. It's taken a while to go through the options and
find a date that works for venue and us. Subject to any last hitches we
have now settled on a venue in central London on Saturday 29 June. Jez
7 May 2019, 13:17 by mar...@templot.com:
> On 07/05/2019 11:34, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>> Your OSM example look fine to me - a single property is still where people
>> reside. Any other details, such as garden, should be mapped individually
>> within that area.
>>
>
> Thanks Dave. But
7 May 2019, 15:09 by emergenc...@outlook.com:
> As it stands, the highway=bus_stop tag is a legacy tag for a node. If the
> platform is a node, it can be put on there (for legacy sake, although the
> p_t:v2 scheme suggests to sunset that tag)
>
p_t:v2 scheme was bad idea. highway=bus_stop is
7 May 2019, 14:38 by mar...@templot.com:
> On 07/05/2019 13:21, Russ Garrett wrote:
>
>>> From a zoomed-out perspective, landuse= (and natural=) is the main
>>>
>> thing you see on the map (especially if buildings aren't mapped), so I
>> think it's pretty useful from a cartographic point of
On 07/05/2019 15:40, David Woolley wrote:
Describing the physical object is a way of objectively mapping, but if
that is all you do, you don't need a map; just use the aerial imagery
directly.
Yes, but the aerial imagery isn't available *free* for anyone to use for
anything. It's not edited
On 07.05.19 16:51, dktue wrote:
Ich meine die Postleitzahl-Multipolygone. Aber wenn ich Dich richtig
verstehe, fehlen die Daten hier einfach, sodass es aktuell unmöglich ist,
diese einzupflegen -- richtig?
Es ist sehr wohl möglich, aber halt nicht automatisch, sondern es bedarf
einiger
Am 07.05.2019 um 16:34 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann:
On 07.05.19 16:07, Daniel Korn wrote:
in Deutschland sind ja seit vielen Jahren die Postleitzahlen
vollständig erfasst -- nicht aber in Österreich. Es würde mich
interessieren, was der größte Blocker hierfür ist: Sind die Daten
verfügbar,
On 07/05/2019 15:22, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
If a pub has external land other than the building itself a similar
schema to 'schools' should be used: draw an enclosing polygon around the
extent of the grounds & tag it with amenity=pub & any other details such
as name, address, website etc.
On 07/05/2019 15:03, Martin Wynne wrote:
But is that what OSM is for -- to describe the *purpose* of a thing?
The original purpose of OSM was to break the monopoly on map data held
by commercial mappers, by taking advantage of the ready availability of
GPS equipment, so the purposes for
On 07.05.19 16:07, Daniel Korn wrote:
in Deutschland sind ja seit vielen Jahren die Postleitzahlen vollständig
erfasst -- nicht aber in Österreich. Es würde mich interessieren, was der
größte Blocker hierfür ist: Sind die Daten verfügbar, aber nicht in
geeigneter Lizenz? Oder sind die Daten
On 07/05/2019 14:38, David Woolley wrote:
On 07/05/2019 13:30, Martin Wynne wrote:
This idea of primary and secondary tags is new to me. There is no
such distinction in the iD editor -- all applied tags are simply
listed in alphabetical order.
Things like name, height, and colour are
Hallo,
in Deutschland sind ja seit vielen Jahren die Postleitzahlen vollständig
erfasst -- nicht aber in Österreich. Es würde mich interessieren, was
der größte Blocker hierfür ist: Sind die Daten verfügbar, aber nicht in
geeigneter Lizenz? Oder sind die Daten überhaupt nicht verfügbar? Oder
On 07/05/2019 14:38, David Woolley wrote:
However, I wouldn't say the primary purpose of the area you were asking
about is to be a garden; I would say it is somewhere to reside, and the
gardens form a subsidiary part of it, and should be represented with
nested areas.
Thanks David.
But is
That you're discussing so many different iterations of the PT schema
proves what a cock-up it is.
That you believe all the PT tags are valid proves you've never make the
schema simpler.
You're even suggesting adding more!
highway=bus_stop is a valid, current well used tag more popular than
On 07/05/2019 13:30, Martin Wynne wrote:
This idea of primary and secondary tags is new to me. There is no such
distinction in the iD editor -- all applied tags are simply listed in
alphabetical order.
Things like name, height, and colour are normally considered secondary.
Things like
The higher resolution images and more frequent capture when at highway
speeds are very helpful for making sure street name signs get captured and
are readable, often I see reports from downstream users about a street name
being wrong in OSM, so having this in Mapillary helps provide some ground
On 06/05/2019 19:53, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 2019-05-03 12:09, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
This reinforces my point about misappropriation of tags. A platform is
a physical construction higher than the surrounding ground to allow
easier boarding.
It's a logical platform whether it
I think someone in this discussion is confusing the idea of a new scheme with
the current one.
As it stands, the highway=bus_stop tag is a legacy tag for a node. If the
platform is a node, it can be put on there (for legacy sake, although the
p_t:v2 scheme suggests to sunset that tag) but if
Ahoj,
mě by v prvé řadě zajímalo, jak identifikovat takovéto přerušené relace. Co
s tím pak dál by se začalo řešit až podle toho, kolik toho bude. Počítám, že
moc ne. Možná tohle byla jediná výjimka ;-)
Pokud není žádný nástroj, tak si zkusím něco napsat. Ale až příští týden.
Zítra na pár
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 13:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
> Thanks Russ. That's what I was getting at when I started this topic. How
> many houses make a residential area? Does it make sense to apply it to a
> single isolated house?
I reckon it does, although it depends on your level of patience. The
On 07/05/2019 13:21, Russ Garrett wrote:
From a zoomed-out perspective, landuse= (and natural=) is the main
thing you see on the map (especially if buildings aren't mapped), so I
think it's pretty useful from a cartographic point of view. It's not
just about what you see on the ground, but
On 07/05/2019 13:04, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Primarily, map
what you see on the ground, Any legalese requirements (access
restrictions etc) can be added as secondary tags.
Thanks Dave. In that case, I would think landuse=residential would be a
secondary tag on something else more visible?
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 12:40, Martin Wynne wrote:
> I don't know anyone who would say "I see a residential area". Or "I see
> a plot of land with planning class C3 or C4".
From a zoomed-out perspective, landuse= (and natural=) is the main
thing you see on the map (especially if buildings aren't
Behind the scenes, your OSMUK Directors are engaging with various groups to
raise the profile of OpenStreetMap in the UK. We don't always get to shout
about it at the time, but here goes...
We now have good rapport with the Open Data Institute (the ODI). This in
part encouraged them to send 2
Čísla spravuje ŘSD, číslování dělají zřejmě v koordinaci s krajskými
správami silnic - obvykle čísla III třídy vychází z čísla blízké II nebo I.
třídy
U druhých i prvních tříd lze najít nesouvislé úseky, i když většinou
(krátká přerušení) by to mohlo být peážované (a tudíž jeden úsek s více
čísly)
On 07/05/2019 12:40, Martin Wynne wrote:
Are we trying to create a legal reference document?
Or a description of what a visitor would see on the ground?
From OSM's main welcome page:
"OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both /real and
current"
On 07/05/2019 12:40, Martin Wynne wrote:
I think this goes to the heart of my (mis)understanding of what OSM is for?
Are we trying to create a legal reference document?
Or a description of what a visitor would see on the ground?
We are trying to create something that serves several
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112368662
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 07/05/2019 12:04, David Woolley wrote:
I would say it was anything that was landuse=residential, and, in the
UK, that would basically be anything where the primary planning class
was C3 or C4.
Thanks David.
I think this goes to the heart of my (mis)understanding of what OSM is for?
Are
On 07/05/2019 12:17, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 07/05/2019 11:34, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Your OSM example look fine to me - a single property is still where
people reside. Any other details, such as garden, should be mapped
individually within that area.
Thanks Dave. But in that case, why in
On 07/05/2019 12:17, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 07/05/2019 11:34, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Your OSM example look fine to me - a single property is still where
people reside. Any other details, such as garden, should be mapped
individually within that area.
Thanks Dave. But in that case, why in
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 13:53 -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 2019-05-03 12:09, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
> > On 30/04/2019 18:34, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > > A platform is where people wait to board; if they stand at a
> > > pole
> > > (typical for buses), then the pole is logically the
On 07/05/2019 11:34, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Your OSM example look fine to me - a single property is still where
people reside. Any other details, such as garden, should be mapped
individually within that area.
Thanks Dave. But in that case, why in the iD editor when I change
"Residential
On 07/05/2019 11:11, Martin Wynne wrote:
What is a "residential area" in the iD editor? How many dwellings are
needed in what proximity to become one? Is it a physical plot of land on
which at least one person lives? Or the usual meaning of a
village/hamlet/housing estate/suburb where a number
Bonjour
Désolé, mon but n'était pas de vexer qui que ce soit, mon propos était
peut-être maladroit mais argumenté. Justement, j'ai lu avec attention ce que
vous avez pris du temps à écrire et j'ai formulé des critiques majoritairement
constructives (à mon humble avis). J'ai passé beaucoup
Your OSM example look fine to me - a single property is still where
people reside. Any other details, such as garden, should be mapped
individually within that area.
The mistake early in OSM's life was to use this tag to indicate a
village/town/city as a whole, with a blanket polygon covering
Corect, nu mai adaugam.
Asta am zis 13 zile in urma
change-setul de sub link este de o luna in urma.
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:20 PM Razvan Radulescu
wrote:
> Salut
>
>
>
> Parca ramasese ca nu mai adaugati nume inexistente pe drumuri judetene,
> sau oricum nu pe alte drumuri cu rank mai
Ok, thanks to everyone for your response.
Kindly, Héctor.
El lun., 6 may. 2019 a las 22:15, Tijmen Stam ()
escribió:
> On 29-04-19 16:58, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > The route and route_master relations have a documented "colour" key that
> > can be used. However, that seems to be intended for
Hola, Miguel:
¿Qué tal si preguntamos esto del párrafo y la licencia en general al LWG
y/o imports? Así salimos de dudas.
Saúdos,
Rafael.
O 07/05/19 ás 10:03, Miguel Branco escribiu:
Buenos días,
Sobre la licencia, resalto que citan:
- es "compatible" con la CC BY 4.0, no dice
What is a "residential area" in the iD editor? How many dwellings are
needed in what proximity to become one? Is it a physical plot of land on
which at least one person lives? Or the usual meaning of a
village/hamlet/housing estate/suburb where a number of people live?
In my patch there are
On 07/05/2019 10:38, Simon Poole wrote:
... (and the admins need to be available).
That's the key bit, I think, and that's likely to be when the admins are
awake (i.e. some hours after the people on this list are).
Beyond that (at the risk of stating the bleeding obvious), maybe try
Am 07.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Sebastian S.:
> Simon,
> I know about the reporting option, have reported some myself.
> However as outlined on this diary entry
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp/diary/172800
> there have been thousands in the last couple of days.
> Manually responding
I know that it's not always possible but in some cases, you can find the
boundaries via the boundary stones (when they exists like in
buildings/chapels). But they are generally well hidden - it often need
local knowledge like from local notary of the village or local
historican... And if you have
Simon,
I know about the reporting option, have reported some myself.
However as outlined on this diary entry
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp/diary/172800
there have been thousands in the last couple of days.
Manually responding to so many, likely automatically generated, post seems a
Good morning,thanks a lot for your reply. It is difficult to see for me how
you could see "by field survey" where administrative boundaries run. This is
impossible, as they are not a physical feature. Therefore, the only valid
reference are the official data. I agree that OSM is quite good,
út 7. 5. 2019 v 10:19 odesílatel napsal:
> Ouplně super!
> Jsme schopni
> a) vědět, zda budou u těch dat realizovat nějaký průběžný update? Jak často?
urcite ano, jak casto mozna i nekde zaznelo, zkusil bych zaznam
prednasky z SotM.
> b) sladit to s nějakými našemi výstupy? Tedy např. tak, aby
Ouplně super!
Jsme schopni
a) vědět, zda budou u těch dat realizovat nějaký průběžný update? Jak často?
b) sladit to s nějakými našemi výstupy? Tedy např. tak, aby oni mohli uvést
zmínku o osmap.cz třeba i s výzvou typu "Můžete se připojit, chcete vědět jak?"
a my ve stejný čas měli na toto téma
Am 07.05.19 um 00:08 schrieb Vincent Privat:
> L'article est là:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/josmeditor/diary/172694
Merci pour prendre le temps!
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Buenos días,
Sobre la licencia, resalto que citan:
- es "compatible" con la CC BY 4.0, no dice explícitamente que sean datos
con esa licencia, y
- en el último párrafo dan permisos de uso de sus datos alojados en
mapas.xunta.gal "sin restricciones" para ser usados siempre que se cite la
fuente,
Hello,
To me this dataset is not necessarily better than what we have in OSM (as
we corrected some border by field survey where this dataset is wrong).
I would never "replace" blindly all existing geometry by this one. I think
we can say that we are more or less correct (i never saw errors
EN: Good morning, from time to time I make adjustments in OSM where the
boundaries between municipalities in OSM are not exactly following the official
data. However, this is a tedious process, and it would be nice, of course, to
have the exact data for all Belgium municipalities (and former
Bonjour et merci beaucoup Vincent pour cet article, clair et positif :-)
Cyrille37.
Le 07/05/2019 à 00:08, Vincent Privat a écrit :
L'article est là:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/josmeditor/diary/172694
Désolé j'ai pas lu plus loin. J'ai du mal avec les réactions qui
commencent par "Il
Ne. Ref na cestách souhlasilo s relacemi. Tak jsem to taky našel - zarazilo
mě, že v relaci jsou tři úseky, z toho dva několik desítek kilometrů od toho
prvního.
Marián
-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Majka
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic
Datum: 7. 5. 2019 7:57:33
Předmět:
Bonjour Vincent,Ne t'inquiète pas : peu importe les intentions, tout acte publique amène son lot de critique plus où moins adroitement exprimé. Que cela ne vous démotive pas de donner du temps pour JOSM et de communiquer sur votre stratégie !Perso je n'y connais pas grand chose en la matière
84 matches
Mail list logo
