Kenny Moens wrote:
Hello guys,
In the region where I live (Hulshout), some of the borders are recently
mapped, but they don't follow the exact features which form the border.
For example, in the area between Ramsel and Westmeerbeek the city border
follows the Steenkensbeek which I recently
Hello
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 10:02, Kenny Moens a écrit :
In the region where I live (Hulshout), some of the borders are recently
mapped, but they don't follow the exact features which form the border.
For example, in the area between Ramsel and Westmeerbeek the city border
follows the
A lot of municipality borders follow the course of rivers,... as they were
when the borders were fixed. A lot of small rivers have been modernised for
the first time during the 1840-1860 time. Curves have been removed, and so
on... That was well after the fixing of the borders. So in a lot of
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kenny Moens street...@functor.be wrote:
Hello guys,
In the region where I live (Hulshout), some of the borders are recently
mapped, but they don't follow the exact features which form the border. For
example, in the area between Ramsel and Westmeerbeek the
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
- If the border is legally bound to the stream, and should move with it in
case its path change, then you should tag it on the same way (or share the
nodes).
- If it is actually on the same path than the stream,
On dimanche 05 décembre 2010 at 12:30, Ben Laenen wrote :
Boundaries used to be bound to streams, roads etc, but not any more.
Now they're all defined by sets of coordinates. If for example bad
weather happens and the stream suddenly follows a different course,
the boundary won't move with it.
