Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten

Yet another way to use the data is to write a small program that extracts that data. I wrote a small Python program to download all nodes of a walking network. That data is then converted into a file with waypoints that I can use on my Garmin GPS. It will be rather easy to convert this program to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten

On Friday 14 June 2013 21:02:28 Daan Bellefroid wrote: > I kind of get how to add a piece of way to the fietsknooppuntennetwerk. > > But I do not see how to add the knooppunt itself on the map? > > On the openfietsmap, you see the knooppunten with their numbers. > But on the OSM, you don't see th

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:49:55PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:04:56PM +0200, Glenn Plas wrote: > > http://www.vlaamsbrabant.be/binaries/kaart-vlaamsbrabant-fusiegemeenten-deelgemeenten_tcm5-11555.pdf > > That's not even complete. For instance Haacht exists of Haacht, >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten

Do you use JOSM? F12, 3rd icon, Map paint styles, Numbered Cycle Node networks I had the same problem and then I discovered MapCSS and created that style. Call me on Skype (Polyglot.Openstreetmap) if you'd like me to share my JOSM window with you for some hands on explanation about mapping the c

[OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten

I kind of get how to add a piece of way to the fietsknooppuntennetwerk. But I do not see how to add the knooppunt itself on the map? On the openfietsmap, you see the knooppunten with their numbers. But on the OSM, you don't see these. Is there documentation about this? __

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:04:56PM +0200, Glenn Plas wrote: > http://www.vlaamsbrabant.be/binaries/kaart-vlaamsbrabant-fusiegemeenten-deelgemeenten_tcm5-11555.pdf That's not even complete. For instance Haacht exists of Haacht, Wespelaar, Tildonk, Wakkerzeel en Kelfs. You can find signs on the st

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

http://www.vlaamsbrabant.be/binaries/kaart-vlaamsbrabant-fusiegemeenten-deelgemeenten_tcm5-11555.pdf Glenn ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On 06/14/2013 04:43 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: But how do people know then where to put the administrative boundaries??? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Mapping_resources + personal knowledge + local maps + ... There are many sources. 'Deelgemeentes' aren't as importan

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

But how do people know then where to put the administrative boundaries??? On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > On 06/14/2013 03:57 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: > >> http://download.agiv.be/**Producten/Detail?id=10&title=** >> Voorlopig_referentiebestand_**gemeentegrenzen

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS OSM integration workshop in Brussels (Jo)

Sorry Jo finally I won't be able to make it tonight, I have to go to Leuven... On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jo wrote: > Preferably near to a railway station. I'm tempted to go and have a look > at/around Place de la Monnaie/Muntplein to get an idea for doing mapping > parties around there

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On 06/14/2013 03:57 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: http://download.agiv.be/Producten/Detail?id=10&title=Voorlopig_referentiebestand_gemeentegrenzen I checked with QGIS and there aren't any 'deelgemeentes' in it. Names like Werchter and Weerde are not in it. Bummer

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

http://download.agiv.be/Producten/Detail?id=10&title=Voorlopig_referentiebestand_gemeentegrenzen On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > On 06/14/2013 03:46 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: > > I foundation very recent boundaries but GML format. > > > Would love to see those, gml isn't

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On 06/14/2013 03:46 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: I foundation very recent boundaries but GML format. Would love to see those, gml isn't a problem. Found this at rotselaar.be http://www.rotselaar.be/Index.aspx?SGREF=3972&CREF=4275#.UbsfN_HMjSs I can't see any inside borders on it unfortunately

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

I foundation very recent boundaries but GML format. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 14-jun.-2013 om 15:44 heeft Glenn Plas het volgende geschreven: I was just looking that information up in the forum. As far as I can find out now, a boundary is a way with a tag boundary=* Yeah, I'm making so

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

I was just looking that information up in the forum. As far as I can find out now, a boundary is a way with a tag boundary=* Yeah, I'm making some shortcuts: someone has to map the boundaries with boundary=administrative + admin_level=9 for the deelgemeenten. Then the proper boundaries have to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On Friday 14 June 2013 13:56:55 Daan Bellefroid wrote: > I was just looking that information up in the forum. > As far as I can find out now, a boundary is a way with a tag boundary=* Yeah, I'm making some shortcuts: someone has to map the boundaries with boundary=administrative + admin_level=9 f

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS OSM integration workshop in Brussels (Jo)

Preferably near to a railway station. I'm tempted to go and have a look at/around Place de la Monnaie/Muntplein to get an idea for doing mapping parties around there in July. I have a computer with me. I can even reboot it to Ubuntu if you're allergic to Windows. Jo 2013/6/14 Anton Snoeys > De

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

On Friday 14 June 2013 13:38:18 Daan Bellefroid wrote: > Or maybe because of the "Arrondissement Leuven" (bigger than the city) > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2524256 I think that if someone can add the boundaries of the deelgemeente of Werchter, the problem will solve itself.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

Or maybe because of the "Arrondissement Leuven" (bigger than the city) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2524256 On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained > according to the current data: > > http://www.op

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS OSM integration workshop in Brussels (Jo)

It's either a place where you have to work on improving Openstreetmap in miserable conditions for little or no gain OR it's little joke of mine to see if you guys were paying attention :-) It's mostly a get together to find the best ways for integrating this data in the most efficient way. Jo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

Can you find for instance Wezemaal? Is also Rotselaar, so same situation as Werchter. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 14-jun.-2013 om 12:48 heeft Glenn Plas het volgende geschreven: Maybe it's me but I cannot find any administrative boundary concerning Werchter inside Rotselaar. Also removed a h

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

Well, it is wrong. Can it be changed? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 14-jun.-2013 om 12:38 heeft Glenn Plas het volgende geschreven: The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained according to the current data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/143580669 Still looking

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

Maybe it's me but I cannot find any administrative boundary concerning Werchter inside Rotselaar. Also removed a highway crossing tag from Leuven boundary[7]. So it's possible the search fails due to this fact. Glenn On 06/14/2013 12:38 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: The fact that Rotselaar trickles u

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained according to the current data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/143580669 Still looking into that search problem.. Glenn On 06/14/2013 12:17 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote: Beginners question: In Nominatim: the search "Leyb

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS OSM integration workshop in Brussels (Jo)

What's a sweatshop? On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Jo wrote: > Hi I'll be in Brussels tonight. If somebody wants to meet for a sweatshop, > just holler or call/text me on 0478-33 76 27 with a time (after 19h00) and > a place. > > Jo > > > > ___ > T

[OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

Beginners question: In Nominatim: the search "Leybos, Werchter" gives no results. The search "Leybos, Rotselaar" does. Is this normal behaviour? Of course Werchter is a sub-administration of Rotselaar. Is it so that boundaries are set as "the bigger one wins"? Further, Rotselaar seems to be inc

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS OSM integration workshop in Brussels (Jo)

Hi I'll be in Brussels tonight. If somebody wants to meet for a sweatshop, just holler or call/text me on 0478-33 76 27 with a time (after 19h00) and a place. Jo ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback

would be nice to overlay this on the osm-map! just saying... :-) Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, eMerzh wrote: > No i was not in contact with them ... > and yes it's ok for me to publi

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback

No i was not in contact with them ... and yes it's ok for me to publish the thing it may be interesting to do a better version of it but ... maybe this w-e :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Ben Abelshausen wrote: > Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback

Is it OK if I put this document on twitter (osm_be)? I think osm_be is followed by the urbis people. Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Ben Abelshausen ben.abelshau...@gmail.com http://twitter.com/xivk On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wonderin

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback

Hi, I was just wondering... Did you try to be in contact with Urbis ? I think the people working there will be interested in the work you're doing ! Julien Le 14/06/13 11:09, eMerzh a écrit : Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is real

[OSM-talk-be] Urbis, first feedback

Hi, We've played a bit with Urbis, and the integration process of addresses and buildings is really growing... A few remarks Though : * Adding source=urbis on every node/way is not necessary as long as we put the tag on the changeset . I'm not really fan of that source=* tag and if we want t