As mentioned by Daniel, this is due to the nature of the CANVEC data
import. CANVEC shapefile data is based on tiles and these will chop
practically anything into pieces - lakes are just ones of the more
noticeable. I have corrected some of these myself as I've come across
them. Just be careful
Hello all,
I have been moving about the Island of Newfoundland addressing Keep Right!
issues and adding missing features. While doing so, I encountered an area
of coastline along the Burin Peninsula that appears odd to me.
Specifically, the Garnish River here:
Hi all,
Looking at the wiki page, a large volume of the buildings are of low
quality requiring processing. The trade off here is between not having
buildings and having buildings that are out of place and of poor quality.
I can see people being reluctant to have it imported in an area,
Can't speak for the rest of the country as such, but I do know that the
imagery quality in Newfoundland is rather poor. Recognizing building shapes
would technically work, but the result would be poorly aligned boxes, not
accurate house shapes. We also do not have a local working group as far as
I
That is the key here. Deleting information without replacing it with
something more accurate is inherently destructive. There must be some
thought as to what will be put back or one is essentially ripping the map
up simply because you don't like how something looks or how it closely it
follows a
I would also like to take a read through that document. Sounds interesting.
CANVEC has been good for the Canadian mapping efforts, but it is stale data
and not highly accurate. Yet it provides us a base to work from and has the
benefit of filling the map with ... something. A giant blank gap for
greement with
>>> Daniel message. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *De :* Begin Daniel <jfd...@hotmail.com>
>>> *À :* James <james2...@gmail.com>; Adam Martin <s.adam.mar...@g
That's a pretty harsh thing to deal with. Imports are difficult and the
time needed to get them right is not a small investment. To have someone
review this work is a valuable service, but I don't think just blanket
reverting due to the violation of one rule is the solution, especially in
context
Both of your instincts on the matter are correct - these polygons are the
result of CANVEC data imports and has to do with how that data is packaged
for distribution by Natural Resources. If you go to the CANVEC site, click
on the map, and zoom to an address, you eventually get to the level where
Wait! You mean a robot ... Made a mistake!!?? Say it ain't so!
Sarcasm aside, it's not surprising. The article speaks so highly of the
robots and the crisis peeps over the crafters and the arm chair people. But
it has been my experience that unless the importer is skilled and regularly
consults
d name, just not the
>> postal code from an official source.
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2016 11:00 AM, "Adam Martin" <s.adam.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Bjenk,
>>>
>>> On the Address data, the Talk-CA group has had several discuss
Hey Bjenk,
On the Address data, the Talk-CA group has had several discussions about
it. The problem boils down to Canada Post, which treats the information as
proprietary - they provide any individual going to their site the right to
lookup an address in order to utilize their service to mail
Hi Bjenk,
I think what Paul meant was more along the lines of what specifically you
wanted to do. You state that you want to define a project, but other than
stating that you want to collect certain information about non-residential
buildings, we have little else to go on.
>From the sound of it,
OSM is community driven so you've basically come to the right place to
propose projects for Canada. If the project proposes some sort of change to
the structure of OSM itself, it would need to be brought before the Board
of the Foundation (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation for
more
That is a significant issue. If the original user *brousseaumat* was the
one that made the import and he / she has ... only 8 edits to their name,
all within Ontario, then reversing his work may be enough.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:32 PM, James wrote:
> There's also the
This is often the trouble that long-term mappers might have with
hit-and-run mappers, especially with regards to "living" information that
is added to the map. Static information, like large buildings in a mature
location or major thoroughfares, can be added by these quick mappers and
remain
Hey Denis,
Changes to the coastline takes time to pass through the tile rendering. If
I recall correctly, the coastal tiles may take several weeks to update and
require manual intervention. Looking at the Wiki, I see this (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline): "*Coastline rendering in
Hello Sebastien,
I remember seeing a discussion of this issue - not on the talk.ca mailing
list, but on the subreddit for Openstreetmap (
https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/3z7w9d/where_are_the_great_lakes/).
In it, the OP notes that the Great Lakes have disappeared off the map at
Taking a look around the data in OSM for Toronto, it would appear that the
address interpolations have been added via import from CanVec already,
Pierre. Which prompts the question as to what, exactly, did the people from
Metrolinx mean when they expressed concern about "getting better address
Hi all!
Thanks for the heads up, James. I was not personally aware of this change
until now. Reading the news release for the CanVec+ from the Geogratis site
(http://geogratis.gc.ca/site/eng/whats-new/intro-canvec). I think one of
the key statements on the website is that the Department of
I would think it's the parts that give them the power to revoke the license
to use the data at any time. For it to be used in OSM, it has to be
essentially surrendered to the map. When I joined two years ago, one of the
stipulations was to specifically accept the licensing agreement of OSM
which
Reviewing the types that you suggest here, the result seems reasonable.
Major Canadian Highways are generally a blend of the two, I find. Type 1
trunks rely on restricted access and the main highways in cities are
generally limited in this manner. Likewise, these restrictions lift, in a
sense,
Good point - there is lots of good, free data being compiled out there that
could make excellent additions to the map. But importing is a very complex
business - especially in any area where other survey and contributor data
already exists. Extreme caution should be taken to ensure that imported
Hey Russell / all,
I performed a rudimentary test of an address in the map without a postal
code and later used the Nominatim to search for it to see what it produced.
The address was 27 Cairo Street in St. John's, NL - I used this because it
is an old address of mine and I know the postal code
Hey all,
I was reading over the previous discussions held here regarding the issue
of obtaining postal codes for use with civic addresses in Canada. I
understand that, unless specific permission is obtained, there is no way to
utilize the information stored in the Canada Post database, even if
I have a question for the group regarding the designation of various roads
within city regions. Specifically, with reference to primary, secondary,
and tertiary roads. What exactly is the criteria being used to designate a
road as one or the other? I know that the wiki provides guidance, but it
Hello Dega / all,
With regard to a path that cuts through a forest, the initial thought might
be to map the path as dirt or something similar. However, this would not be
efficient nor required. A line that denotes a path is, in itself,
technically a type of land tag as the any such pathway must
Oops, meant to reply to the list, not an individual. :)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] RIP CanVec
To: Alan Trick alantr...@gmail.com
I have had some experience regarding the use
Hey all,
I have a quick question on data that has been imported from CANVEC. I have
been doing some work on the North-West side of Thunder Bay in Ontario. Part
of that has been attempting to revamp the land use designations there. At
the moment, the use has been entered via CANVEC import, but a
in the first place (no data vs. bad data). Working with
gigantic multipolygons is indeed a pain and I don't think there is any
value to preserving the import data.
Just my two cents,
Harald.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com
wrote
Charles,
I took a look at the area that you describe and I see what you mean - the
coastline designation disappears around Sorel and reappears just past
Montreal. Looking in the area of the gap, the use of Coastline appears to
suddenly switch to Water and Riverbank. The source of the information
them and find out their reasons.
Andrew
alester
Victoria, BC
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 3, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles,
I took a look at the area that you describe and I see what you mean - the
coastline designation disappears around Sorel
with that part myself - always willing to lend a hand.
Adam
On Mar 27, 2014 11:42 PM, i...@gmx.com wrote:
Would it be possible to only import the tundra parts? There are no wood
areas. Or just Ellesmere island? There are just lakes and tundra.
Ivolino
*Von:* Adam Martin
I can see the point here - better to have something than nothing. Still, my
tendency would be to opt for a mapping project like the ones performed on
other areas rather than a mass import. Imported data needs to be treated
with kid gloves as it is easy to end up with faulty information. Wood areas
Hey all,
Quick question regarding tagging buildings. I've come across several that
are owned and maintained by a local telecom company. These are buildings,
usually located in residential areas, look somewhat like houses, but are
there to provide switching and distribution of communications
Hey all,
Figured I look, for the codes mentioned on the GNS site and save others the
trouble.
ADM 1 Codes
First-order administrative division. An administrative area directly
subordinate to the pertinent governing authority.
CC1
Country code. CA being Canada.
DSG
Feature designation code.
Thanks Harald. Especially for the corrections in Newfoundland - we don't
have many of them but they're there.
On Jan 16, 2014 7:00 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
I am happy to report that all of Canada should now be free of this issue!
I just fixed the last one all the way west in
Hello!
I have a question regarding the maritime boundary of Canada, specifically
Newfoundland and Labrador. National maritime boundaries generally use the
12 nautical mile limit, unless otherwise specified. I see the boundary for
the province (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=7/48.283/-53.196)
Bonjour Simon!
Forgive my lack of ability in writing french - hopefully it won't make a
difference. Took a look at the area that you are referring to. The area
that is designated as the park is a Forest while the other overlapping
area is designated as Wood. From looking over the maps provided by
.
*From:* Adam Martin [mailto:s.adam.mar...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2014 11:19 AM
*To:* Simon Mercier
*Cc:* talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Parc Summit Montréal
Bonjour Simon!
Forgive my lack of ability in writing french - hopefully it won't make a
difference
Darren,
I'd also like to hear what the consensus is on this point. Generally, a GPS
trace is optimal, but not always possible. Personally, I find that tracing
the satellite imagery tends to provide a good result. I've performed some
localized tests to ensure that these traced roads are comparable
The effort behind OSM in terms of the map is to obtain, enter and maintain
accurate and up-to-date data. Any effort to create a community is ours as
the Canadian users of the editing tools.
As such, the assertion that importing should be discouraged is one for the
benefit of the map and not the
Based on an earlier discussion on the OSM Canada board, I've been trying to
figure out what is the best way of correcting the floating island error
that has been plaguing the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Specifically, the error occurs from two directions. The first is localized
on the
Hello all,
This is my first to this list and I have a question regarding a particular
keep right error I keep seeing for the island portion of Newfoundland and
Labrador. All roads within the Province are flagged as being Floating
Islands, indicating that there is some sort of gap or break in the
--
*De :* Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com
*À :* talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
*Envoyé le :* Lundi 25 novembre 2013 18h48
*Objet :* [Talk-ca] Keep Right Error
Hello all,
This is my first to this list and I have a question regarding a particular
keep right
45 matches
Mail list logo