Thanks Harald. Especially for the corrections in Newfoundland - we don't have many of them but they're there. On Jan 16, 2014 7:00 PM, "Harald Kliems" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am happy to report that all of Canada should now be free of this issue! > I just fixed the last one all the way west in Saint John's. Yay! > > Harald. > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Some updates on this issue: >> >> I contacted Martijn a while ago with the suggestion of running this as a >> Maproulette. He liked the idea but I haven't heard back in a while. He also >> asked me how many cases we're talking about and based on the Overpass query >> mentioned upthread I came to the conclusion that the number is actually not >> that high (maybe 400 cases in all of Canada at the most). Therefore I've >> started fixing the issue manually and already cleaned up all of Quebec. It >> took me several hours, but that's partly because you always discover other >> issues to take care of as you go along (e.g. missing motorway_junction, >> name vs. exit_to on those junctions etc.). >> >> I'll continue working on this in Ontario now and I encourage others to go >> ahead in the other provinces, too. Just run >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CI on the appropriate bounding box and then >> go through each of the spots that come up. If there is hi-res Bing imagery >> available the fix will be obvious; and if not common sense should still >> tell you if a segment is oneway=yes or oneway=no. I have added a oneway tag >> to every motorway_link segment, both to avoid any misunderstanding with the >> default and to allow me to track the progress on the Overpass map. >> >> Cheers, >> Harald. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So before contacting Martijn I want to be sure that we can properly >>> identify the potentially problematic ways. What we are looking for are ways >>> that match the following query: >>> >>> (highway="motorway_link") AND (NOT oneway=*) AND (lanes!="1") >>> >>> Or in natural language: ways that are motorway links but don't have the >>> oneway tag nor are tagged as having one lane. If you want to test this >>> query, go to this link http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CI and adjust the >>> bounding box coordinates for the desired area. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Harald. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> The example I provided yesterday was not fixed. Most the exits having >>>> a similar look along the trans-Canada Highway in Quebec are the same. I >>>> have also found examples in Alberta and In BC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Harald Kliems [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* November-26-13 10:04 >>>> *To:* Daniel Begin >>>> *Cc:* Connors, Bernie (SNB); Talk-CA OpenStreetMap >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I can write an email to Martijn with a proposal. Does anyone have a >>>> link to an exit that has not been fixed yet to use as an example? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Harald. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It seems to me it is the only safe solution. I go for maproulette.org >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Connors, Bernie (SNB) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* November-26-13 08:19 >>>> *To:* 'Harald Kliems'; Daniel Begin >>>> *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap >>>> *Subject:* RE: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 for the Maproulette.org solution. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Bernie. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Bernie Connors, P.Eng >>>> >>>> Tel: 506-444-2077 >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> *SNB – We make it happen…* >>>> >>>> [image: SAG_Logo_2013] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Harald Kliems [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] >>>> *Sent:* Monday, 2013-11-25 5:05 PM >>>> *To:* Daniel Begin >>>> *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hooo, I see, and I also see there was not a large consensus on that >>>> point (Discussion) since all other ways are having a different behavior… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> About all motorway_link in Canada are having the same problem! >>>> >>>> I don't know, I rarely encounter this issue in practice. Adding >>>> oneway=no to all motorway_link seems rather dangerous and >>>> counterproductive. The best solution would probably be to create a query >>>> that will find all imported motorway_link that have not been touched since >>>> the import and then check them. Depending on how big the task is we could >>>> ask Martijn to set it up as a Maproulette (http://maproulette.org/). >>>> Or we set up a wiki page to coordinate people going through all the >>>> motorways/exits and make sure everything is okay by hand. There are only 33 >>>> Autoroutes in Quebec after all :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Harald. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! >>>> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! >>> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! >> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565 >> > > > > -- > Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! > Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565 > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
<<image001.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
