' in alt_name instead of old_name. If
you think about it Uluru *is* the old name...
Thirded!
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/li
e has been a practice in OSM to *not* map certain things,
such as private/non-publicized domestic violence shelters, or the
nesting sites of endangered birds. So the same logic applies here I
think.
Both points seconded.
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http:/
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 09:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
Should that be documented as OSM (maybe AU?) policy, or left to the
discretion of individual mappers?
Definitely documented as such.
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.
Yes, as I said landuse doesn't seem to be what I'm after here.
What was the objection to fine grained land ownership in OSM? Seems
like a particularly useful thing to have in. Is it just "imports suck"?
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
rders would have been a useful way to indicate
addresses - also seems more correct than using buildings, to my mind
anyway.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
On Sun, 3 Jan, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/01/2016 9:
something like:
area=yes
addr:housenumber=...
addr:street=...
But then Karlsruhe says that buildings should be tagged with the addr:*
tags instead?
Any suggestions?
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
__
that all sound reasonable? Any suggestions of
resources/nifty things to demo in the presentation gratefully accepted.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ http://mjog.vee.net/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https
On Tue, 29 Apr, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com wrote:
On 28 Apr 2014, at 1:53 pm, Michael Gratton m...@vee.net wrote:
On a related note, what's the appropriate way to map suburb-sized
areas that are partitions? A way for each suburb that share nodes
along common borders
On Mon, 28 Apr, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 April 2014 14:23, Michael Gratton m...@vee.net wrote:
So you are saying the ABS suburb boundaries should be checked
individually
rather than imported en mass? How do you know that the quality of
the
GNB
Hey Ian,
On Sun, 27 Apr, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't really agree. I think we need suburb boundaries to be as
accurate as we can make them at the time we create them, and not do a
mass import leaving us with thousands of FIXMEs. Importing data we
know
, however inaccurate, be better than
nothing?
//Mike
Email sent to sds.copyri...@lpi.nsw.gov.au:
On Mon, 21 Apr, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Michael Gratton m...@vee.net wrote:
Hello,
I am a contributor to Open Street Map (OSM)[1], a world-wide,
collaboratively edited, open project to create a global
Oooh! I'll bikeshed, err I mean bite!
Is the path underground, so could you use layer=-1? If not, then
layer=0 sounds good to me.
//Mike
On Fri, 4 Apr, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Frank sundowne...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Here is a nice puzzel?
How would you tag a path that lies under an
On 5 March 2014 7:21:28 PM Dssis1 david.sisour...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, just letting you guys know that the East-West Link page now uses a OSM
map to show drilling locations.
Now if only we could get governments building /useful/ transport
infrastructure, it would be a win-win!
:/
--
make use of them.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ http://mjog.vee.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
for use for a initial import to OSM?
On 22/01/13 23:17, Michael Gratton wrote:
From the sounds of it, one thing they are anxious is having old
route/timetable data being out in public.
I'm not sure whats wrong with keeping historical records...
In my view, the less restrictions they place
change, routes do seem to come
and go more frequently. It wouldn't be too hard for someone to run a
process on a server somewhere to keep tabs on changes in the feed and
update the map as needed, but it seems like some coordination there
would be a good thing.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept
in addition to stops. The data is there, it just needs a decent
licence.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ http://mjog.vee.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
?), apply the change
4. Otherwise flag it as needing attention
Similarly for additions, and deletions.
So the bot acts much like an individual contributor, except that it uses
the feed as a data source rather than GPS.
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ http://mjog.vee.net
://tdx.131500.com.au/terms-conditions.php, I assume this would be
a deal breaker for OSM?
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ http://mjog.vee.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au
19 matches
Mail list logo
