Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

[Santens Seppe]

Thanks Marc, I'll proceed in this way.

Any advice on mapping the camera (or pointers to where to get this advice) is 
still welcome.

Seppe

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] 
Verzonden: zondag 15 oktober 2017 7:32
Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

Wit respect to the "to-node", IMHO any node on the way that shows the driving 
direction that is controlled is fine. So if the way to which you want the add 
the enforcement relation is drawn from left to right., any node right of the 
from node is fine. For a way drawn right to left, any node to the left of the 
from node is OK.


regards

m

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I was triggered by a tweet from a journalist
> (https://twitter.com/bertstaes/status/918017848844476416) to start 
> mapping ALPR cameras in Ghent that control access to the “car free 
> area”. Could you have a look at one example I tried to work out? All advice 
> is welcome.
>
>
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5160676344
>
>
>
> Some questions:
>
> ·Can this camera used for access enforcement be seen as a
> surveillance camera? In other words, is it ok to use 
> man_made=surveillance for this?
>
> ·I added an enforcement relation with this camera as “device”. I put
> the node where the traffic sign is as “from”, but I don’t see which 
> node I should put as “to”. Can I just choose the next node on this way 
> (that would be http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/201250401). It seems 
> ok to me, but also a bit arbitrary…
>
>
>
> Other suggestions?
>
>
>
> Seppe
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

[Marc Gemis]

Wit respect to the "to-node", IMHO any node on the way that shows the
driving direction that is controlled is fine. So if the way to which
you want the add the enforcement relation is drawn from left to
right., any node right of the from node is fine. For a way drawn right
to left, any node to the left of the from node is OK.


regards

m

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Santens Seppe  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I was triggered by a tweet from a journalist
> (https://twitter.com/bertstaes/status/918017848844476416) to start mapping
> ALPR cameras in Ghent that control access to the “car free area”. Could you
> have a look at one example I tried to work out? All advice is welcome.
>
>
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5160676344
>
>
>
> Some questions:
>
> ·Can this camera used for access enforcement be seen as a
> surveillance camera? In other words, is it ok to use man_made=surveillance
> for this?
>
> ·I added an enforcement relation with this camera as “device”. I put
> the node where the traffic sign is as “from”, but I don’t see which node I
> should put as “to”. Can I just choose the next node on this way (that would
> be http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/201250401). It seems ok to me, but also
> a bit arbitrary…
>
>
>
> Other suggestions?
>
>
>
> Seppe
>
>
> ___
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be