2013/3/14 Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr
[ ... ] This license is said to be derived from the United Kingdom
license which is said to be compatible with the ODbL (and thus OSM ).
I would appreciate your comments on this.
All right. You asked. :-)
The governments, municipal, provincial
Richard,
I understand that you would prefer that this evolves differently, but lets
focus on the subject and try to progress in the right direction. This url
http://www.data.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=Enn=0D3F42BD-1 describe proposed
license for the government of Canada Open data site to be
Well... Make it simple:
That's more odbl compatible than actual home-made canadian licences
Regard on that fact, that's OSM compatible
So, this is a Way to go ! :)
Bruno Remy
Le 2013-03-15 10:18, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr a écrit :
Richard,
I understand that you would prefer that this
Pierre:
Isn't it exactly Richard's point that the fact that they're choosing
their own, non-standard licence means that we OSM contributors won't
be able to answer your question? We -- or at least most of us -- are
mappers, not IP lawyers. So maybe the licence is compatible, maybe
it's not.
4 matches
Mail list logo