I believe Bjenk was kidding when stating he'd be buying a coffee.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:16 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in
> place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these
>
Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in
place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these
days is one of the forbidden activities. I do trust you are not suggesting
that illegal methods were used when the data was obtained.
The use of
Bjenk(STATS Can) is communicating/pushing with the the city of Ottawa, even
may resolve to offering coffee bribes to be able to host the shared file on
open.canada.ca. He's been relentless in his effort to move the project
forward, but as most Canadian gouvernment entities it moves at a snails
Thanks John
On 24 Oct 2016 4:54 pm, "Frederik Ramm" wrote:
> John,
>
>the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through
> the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I
> think normal mapping should be safe now ;)
>
> Bye
>
John,
the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through
the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I
think normal mapping should be safe now ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
On 2016-10-24 4:08 PM, James wrote:
I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin)
thanks James, looks good.
-jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKenna
___
Talk-ca
I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote:
>
>> It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made
>> up. The emails are public already
Judging by
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair/history#map=10/45.2996/-75.6981
There hasn't been activity in 24hrs... Frederik Ramm said he'd update us.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Thanks John
>
>
On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote:
It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made
up. The emails are public already in the contact section of the import
wiki.If I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These
emails are public emails @ottawa.ca
Thanks John
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made up.
The emails are public already in the contact section of the import wiki.If
I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These emails are
public emails @ottawa.ca and @canada.ca. No personal emails are visible
On
On 2016-10-24 3:28 PM, James wrote:
I've received a forwarded email from Bjenk that may settle the debate
where the data originates from (I'd forward it to the list, but it would
be lost in the mail archive and detach the main thread(:
You asked:
Could you please clarify what the alleged source of the building data to
be imported is?
I clarified. I did not change the subject. The source of the data is the
city of Ottawa
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Christoph Hormann
wrote:
> On Monday 24 October
As for general availability of the files I have this email chain(which was
documented that there was bureaucracy behind the scenes):
*From:* Perkins, Stephen M [mailto:stephen.perk...@ottawa.ca]
*Sent:* July-26-16 4:15 PM
*To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)
*Cc:* Cross,
Christoph,
At the moment the Ottawa building footprint dataset is not on any official
portal other then being shared on a public Amazon S3 Bucket.
You can download the file here:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/statscan/ottawa-buildings.geojson
The data doesn't contain any specific tags, only the
As stated, multiple times on this list already: the city of Ottawa gave
data to Statistics Canada. Statistics Canada gave us (amazon cloud link)
data, which is just building outlines.
In case you are in doubt this project is actually happening or not (and I
am just making the whole thing up):
Seems like they may have dumped it on their servers to the public:
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/cad-topographic-data
This would explain why some buildings are outdated:
*Update Frequency: Never*as compared to:
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/addresspoints
*Update Frequency: Weekly*
On Mon, Oct
On 2016-10-24 08:04 AM, James wrote:
> I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the
> build source data:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap
Cool! I was hoping to be able to show that the geojson data that you
were given
So to obtain all data for building outlines(from source) (from what scruss
has provided) we would need to convert all tiles of the building outline
and join them together as it clips on edge of tile:
http://i66.tinypic.com/2i1ffpx.png
As for additional information from the DWG I have not see any
I've previously documented the Lower Mainland ones here as well:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:British_Columbia:Vancouver#GIS_sources_by_city
Maybe some of this should be moved to your table.
Note the OGL-BC which many of these cities are based on seems to have some
potential problems
I've been looking for open data portals for potential future import into
OpenStreetMap(why duplicate efforts right?)
I've documented the one's I've found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Open_Data
___
Talk-ca mailing list
I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the
build source data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Begin Daniel wrote:
> Well, only very large buildings can be found as
22 matches
Mail list logo