Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Stewart, after re-reading what you posted, it seems to be about the imagery and not derived works. Aka, you cant sell the imagery, use it for finacial gain(duh), but says nothing about derivative works from which I was told was allowed. Clairification would be in order indeed. On Dec 22, 2016

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Eh assez de problèmes comme cela. Permettez moi de dévier un peu cette discussion et parler d'autres problèmes qui me préoccupent davantage. J'arrive de Jérémie, Haiti où la situation est toujours critique 10 semaines après l'ouragan Matthew.  Tout est cassé à Jérémie, les maisons, les écoles,

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

My expectation is the full City of Ottawa building foot print file will be made available around the twelfth of January on their Open Data portal. Although the formal decision has been made apparently they allow their employees to take vacation from time to time hence the delay. At which point

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

It may take a while for them to respond, due to the christmas holiday and all. On Dec 22, 2016 8:13 PM, "James" wrote: > Will do. If it needs to be reverted, I will do so. > > On Dec 22, 2016 8:11 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote: > >> On 2016-12-22 07:47

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Will do. If it needs to be reverted, I will do so. On Dec 22, 2016 8:11 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote: > On 2016-12-22 07:47 PM, James wrote: > > From what was told to me at the school, Stewart, you are allowed to > > create derivative work/tracing, but not distribute the

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

On 2016-12-22 07:47 PM, James wrote: > From what was told to me at the school, Stewart, you are allowed to > create derivative work/tracing, but not distribute the imagery. You may be able to create derivative work, but solely for teaching or academic purposes. The most recent Carleton

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

>From what was told to me at the school, Stewart, you are allowed to create derivative work/tracing, but not distribute the imagery. On Dec 22, 2016 7:29 PM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote: > On 2016-12-22 02:43 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > >

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

On 2016-12-22 02:43 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44545610#map=16/45.4064/-75.7947 > … > But maybe I'm overreacting and I'm prepared to let the matter rest if > the Canadian community finds that normal. I don't find that normal, and I'm sorry you had to deal

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Thank John From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 22 December, 2016 19:00 To: James Cc: Paul Norman; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct > no one maps Gatineau(seriously, maybe cause it's the French side?) Tact my son tact, look the word up in

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

I didnt mean it that way, I ment compared to Montreal, Toronto and OttawaGatineau is a commit wasteland On Dec 22, 2016 7:00 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > > no one maps Gatineau(seriously, maybe cause it's the French side?) > > Tact my son tact, look the word up in the

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

> no one maps Gatineau(seriously, maybe cause it's the French side?) Tact my son tact, look the word up in the dictionary or you'll have Pierre descending on Ottawa demanding double Lattes. Cheerio John On 22 December 2016 at 18:40, James wrote: > Paul, I am aware of

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

If you want me to commit in even smaller chunks I don't mind, I just hate wasting "commit numbers" (see int64 limit, in which osm will have to change their commit id schema or support int128) ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Paul, I am aware of conflicts may occur, but seeing as no one maps Gatineau(seriously, maybe cause it's the French side?) I'm not that scared to go on a mapping session all day long. In Toronto or Ottawa is a different story, in which I would commit more often. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:35 PM,

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

On 12/22/2016 3:21 PM, James wrote: As pnorman has said in the past( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-September/007260.html): / Uploaded in small enough parts that the changesets make sense. This means never uploading more than 50k objects at once, and typically fewer

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Especially with building tools(quick rectangles, predefined tags) and the extruder tool(create areas : x as shortcut) it litterally takes me less than 2 seconds to map a building, then it's on to the next one beside it. More complexe ones(with arcs) may take me longer, but I still average a lot

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Well I do have a logitech g9 gaming mouse, that is pretty awesome for mapping and gamingbut I doubt that's the issue here. On Dec 22, 2016 5:55 PM, "john whelan" wrote: Ask him to show you his gaming mouse with the Hyperglide teflon engineered mouse skates. Cheerio

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Ask him to show you his gaming mouse with the Hyperglide teflon engineered mouse skates. Cheerio John On 22 December 2016 at 16:28, Michael Reichert wrote: > Hi James, > > Am 22.12.2016 um 21:23 schrieb James: > > And suddenly the osmcha disapproval from Nakaner(Michael has >

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

As Devonf has pointed out, if you want to see the carletonuniversity(cant download I'm sorry) you can visit http://maps.ottawa.ca/geoottawa/ and view the "2014" aerial ortho, which seems to be the same. I'm not trying to hide anything, the fact that it's not available for download is out of my

[Talk-ca] Community conduct / mapping

Just a gentle comment. We do have mappers on the ground in Ottawa/Gatineau and we do talk face to face believe it or not and we have been known to discuss things over coffee. We have ways of disciplining tatty mappers, they get to buy the next round of coffee. Our local mappers have been known

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

It's too bad I document everything before. http://imgur.com/a/yedmc On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:23 PM, James wrote: > And suddenly the osmcha disapproval from Nakaner(Michael has > disapearedI know he's on this list as he does popup from time to time > on this

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

And suddenly the osmcha disapproval from Nakaner(Michael has disapearedI know he's on this list as he does popup from time to time on this listvery suspicious indeed. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:08 PM, James wrote: > http://osmcha.mapbox.com/44545610/ > I can see that

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

http://osmcha.mapbox.com/44545610/ I can see that it was our Friend Nakaner that has reported it to you, in which there was a whole shit-show (sorry for the language) with Rps333 and CanVEC imports in the north. You cannot deny that you and Nakaner have a history with Rps333, Denis and I. So to

Re: [Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Frederik, your email is very opinionated, when I have just showed you (pixel based) why I drew that building like that. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > >I've been involved in a changeset discussion that I would like to > bring to the

[Talk-ca] Community Conduct

Hi, I've been involved in a changeset discussion that I would like to bring to the attention of a wider audience: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44545610#map=16/45.4064/-75.7947 I don't think I'm the right person to continue that discussion but I see several questionable attitudes

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca Digest, Vol 106, Issue 5

vey? Should the aerial imagery be aligned to the polygon, or vise versa? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20161222/c39e63ba/attachment-0001.html> -- Message: 3

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Fwd: [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

*1. Arn't the building polygons already available? I see large buildings > and the topographic DWG file

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Fwd: [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Hi devon, those DWG files(if you were following the import thread, you would already know this) are old and outdated, never to be updated again. The newer file is an export of what they have to date. On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Devon Fyson wrote: > Here's are my

[Talk-ca] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Hello everyone, As James wrote yesterday, the City of Ottawa has approved the release of a large building footprints file for their Open Data portal. We have been working in close collaboration with the City of Ottawa on that front and it is a major contribution. We are tracking progress and