Hi everyone,
I've done some OSMInspector debugging of areas around Montreal and
I've come across a number of newly imported natural=wetland areas,
sourced from Canvec 10. that are clearly wrong. This, for example,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.69514lon=-73.90455zoom=17layers=M
is a
...@gmail.com
À : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 octobre 2012 14h04
Objet : [Talk-ca] Canvec 10 and landcover issues
Hi everyone,
I've done some OSMInspector debugging of areas around Montreal and
I've come across a number of newly imported natural=wetland areas
From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:04 AM
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: [Talk-ca] Canvec 10 and landcover issues
Hi everyone,
I've done some OSMInspector debugging of areas around Montreal and I've
come across a number of newly imported
Hi Pierre,
thanks for the response.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I dont know how you conclude that there is no wetlands around this area in
Laval. It is not sufficient to see houses around to conclude that there is
no wetland. These are often
On 19-10-2012 21:46, Harald Kliems wrote:
Hi Pierre,
thanks for the response.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I dont know how you conclude that there is no wetlands around this area in
Laval. It is not sufficient to see houses around to conclude
%3Dwetland
Pierre
De : Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com
À : Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 octobre 2012 15h46
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec 10 and landcover issues
Hi Pierre
6 matches
Mail list logo