Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bégin, Daniel
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
Bonjour à tous,
It seems that the product triggers some interest over the community! Here are
answers to some comments I received last week/weekend.
Yup, Over in Vancouver were talking a close look at it also :)
Problems solved...
- Misspelled highway=unclasified: Corrected for the release;
- Duplicated hydrological features: Corrected for the release;
Awesome... i have no idea how you managed todo that, but great work :-)
- Turning_circle: Will be removed for the release (1);
- Bridge layer: Will be set to layer=1 for the release;
Model paradigm...
The following items are related to the Canvec data model. I will have a look
but I cant guaranty anything. However, I will forward your comments to
eventually have the model changed.
- Duplicated ways between footway and footway bridges;
- Duplicate Nodes on bridges crossing over roads;
Miscellaneous...
- Toponyms: Only local mappers can modify it properly;
- Huge forest areas: Should be OK with Quad Tree tiling (2);
- Overlapping features: They will show-up as errors in the Validator. This
was a choice that have been made to ease the upload of a selected subset of
features where there were already corresponding data in Osm.
Cheers,
Daniel
(1): Nays have a good majority
Hi, another option that came up in OSM-CA IRC chat was noexit=yes to
indicate road stops. Perhaps using it in the fixme notes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
OTOH, local mappers would be able to check and see exactly what type
of road-end it is :)
(2): Frank Steggink - bonjour Frank - has done a massive upload of forest
areas, NE of Quebec city, using small tiles. I used his experiment results
to figure out the number of nodes that should trigger tile splitting. The
Quad Tree algorithm usually creates tiles smaller than Frank's experiment.
It should be OK then.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
P.S. Ok, so there's no response about the idea for uploading the NTS
Tile rectangles and indicating what the status of the data in that
area is. So is this not a concern for people? And are we all
confident that we are just treating the data like top-quality Yahoo
imagery, where it is used to supplement the existing OSM map with more
features where it's needed?
If so, that's fine. My concern is about overloading the OSM servers,
as there will be TONNES of data added into OSM over the next few
months / few years as this progresses.
So is the consensus that we WONT be overloading the servers, because
we do not plan on announcing to the world whats going on, and as more
local mappers find out about this, they will be working on their own
tiles. Ie. I map my house, you map your house and eventually we'll
map the world?
Cheers,
Sam
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
