Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Hi Martijn, Am 26.04.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Stewart C. Russell: > I know that Github issues are the industry standard, and the OSM > comment/discussion mechanisms may seem a little quaint, but we risk > talking past one another if we splinter the discussion. Just my 2 cent as a non-Canadian. I

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Hi James, Am 2017-01-24 um 21:05 schrieb James: > The sources are now available on the city of Ottawa's website. As such was > the major hurdle last time to proceed with the import and it is now taken > care of (http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/urban-buildings) and the local > community in agreement

Re: [Talk-ca] Light rail mapping questions

Hi Mike, Am 2016-10-22 um 20:43 schrieb Mike Boos: > I don't know if I'd characterize this as a "Karlsuhe model" train-tram - > the system is entirely within a single urban area (even if it does span two > adjacent cities), it just uses an existing rail corridor in some places. > Unlike the

Re: [Talk-ca] Light rail mapping questions

Hi Am 2016-10-22 um 21:11 schrieb James: > Could lanes work? > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes > > Example: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Two_driving_directions > > What ever the train tag would be: > train:lanes:forward=no|yes > train:lanes:backwards=no|yes > Then for

Re: [Talk-ca] City of Ottawa imported buildings & addresses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Denis, hi Rps333, hi LogicalViolinist [3] Am 19.10.2016 um 08:31 schrieb Denis Carriere: > Ok this Ottawa reverting process is getting out of hand now! > Frederik (woodpeck_repair) is reverting entire user history without > looking at what his

Re: [Talk-ca] Light rail mapping questions

Hi Mike, Am 18.10.2016 um 03:52 schrieb Mike Boos: > Along on-road sections, the dedicated rail right-of-way moves from > centre-running to the outsides of the street at certain intersections. (A > by-product of some of the political compromises in route choices.) Does > anyone know of any

Re: [Talk-ca] City of Ottawa imported buildings & addresses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Denis, Am 17.10.2016 um 23:22 schrieb Denis Carriere: > *(Frederik Ramm) *just did a mass revert [0] with his revert script > [1] created in 2009 and now we have 20,000+ warnings of empty nodes > within a small section of Ottawa [2]. > > Not

Re: [Talk-ca] City of Ottawa imported buildings & addresses

Hi, Am 17.10.2016 um 19:20 schrieb Michael Reichert: > I have asked a DWG member to block him to stop the ongoing import and > start a discussion. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1065 The second user block (now for three hours): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/106

Re: [Talk-ca] City of Ottawa imported buildings & addresses

Hi James, Am 17.10.2016 um 19:37 schrieb James: > Like this one Kevin? > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-July/007034.html > > or this one? > https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-ca@openstreetmap.org/msg07024.html > > or this one? >

Re: [Talk-ca] City of Ottawa imported buildings & addresses

Hi AJ, Am 17.10.2016 um 18:59 schrieb AJ Ashton: > I haven't seen any substantial discussion about the Ottawa buildings & > addresses import anywhere. I did see the thread a number of weeks back, > "Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada," but I didn't see > anything discussed that sounds

Re: [Talk-ca] [Import] Local community approval building & addresses in Peel region

Hi James, Am 08.09.2016 um 18:49 schrieb James: > As per the import guide lines I wish to seek approval for importing > building outlines and addresses in the region of Peel. > > Documentation is available here: > https://github.com/osmottawa/imports/blob/master/Peel-Region.md You know that the

Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

Hi Sam, Am 01.09.2016 um 23:06 schrieb Sam Dyck: > I received the following changeset comment from Nakaner for a Canvec import > (changeset > 38158126) at 15:55 Central Time (20:55 UTC): > > "This changeset has uploaded data which does not fit to each other. There > is an offset between the

Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada

Hi John, Am 2016-09-01 um 14:47 schrieb john whelan: > The Canvec data was imported with the knowledge and support of the local > mappers and I think that's all that matters. An import of such a size and has to be discussed and approved on an international level. Best regards Michael -- Per

Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Am 2016-09-01 um 13:22 schrieb john whelan: > In many parts of the country there are no local mappers for many > miles or kilometers if you prefer. We do have some very > experienced GIS people around and I'm under the impression that we >

Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada

Hi, Am 01.09.2016 um 01:21 schrieb dega: > On Aug 31, Daniel Bégin wrote: >> On the same topic, it has been suggested to split wooded areas in smaller >> chunks by using features on the ground as outer limits (mostly roads, >> streams, rivers) and get rid of arbitrary rectangles from Canvec. >>

Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

Hi Daniel, Am 2016-09-01 um 12:26 schrieb Begin Daniel: > Furthermore, I hope you will not use you 100 objects per minute to decide > whether or not you will delete a changeset. I think this threshold is value > doesn't' apply (see below) > > Daniel > > About the100 objects threshold. > From

[Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, unfortunately posting via Gmane does not seem to work (the website is down but NNTP still works), that's why I have to start a new thread. :-( Am Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:41:21 -0500 schrieb Sam Dyck: > After reading through the changeset