-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Tyler Gunn
Sent: 16 août 2010 07:08
To: James Ewen
Cc: Talk-Ca
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Over-classification of rural roads in Canvec data?
On further reflection I'm going to re-classify my down-graded tertiaries back
to tertiary. The entire Canvec dataset
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:26:07 -0400, Bégin, Daniel
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
Tyler, James,
FYI, NRN roads are more up to date than anything found in the MLI 20K
seamless maps. The 1:20 000 topographic data was compiled from 1989 to
2001
and has not since then been edited.
Hi
On further reflection I'm going to re-classify my down-graded tertiaries
back to tertiary. The entire Canvec dataset is this way, so we might as
well keep the country consistent. It's such a minor point really in my
mind, why make things over complicated.
Tyler
Tyler,
Have you considered using the 1:20k data published by the Manitoba
government? I think the license is compatible with OSM's, but you'd have to
have a look at it.
https://mli2.gov.mb.ca/ (free registration required for downloading)
(Click on Topographic Maps - 1:20,000 Seamless)
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:52:14 -0600, Brent Fraser bfra...@geoanalytic.com
wrote:
Tyler,
Have you considered using the 1:20k data published by the Manitoba
government? I think the license is compatible with OSM's, but you'd
have
to
have a look at it.
https://mli2.gov.mb.ca/ (free
Oops, should have gone to the list.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:52:14 -0600, Brent Fraser bfra...@geoanalytic.com
wrote:
Tyler,
Have you considered
Richard,
http://mli2.gov.mb.ca//disclaimer/mli_disclaimer2.doc
I've include it below:
--
Disclaimer and Terms of Use Section
Disclaimer of Liability, Browser Compatibility and Licence Agreement for Digital
Data
While every effort
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:23:30 -0400, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
wrote:
Oops, should have gone to the list.
I wasn't able to find the license on the Manitoba site. Any chance
you could link to it, and send it to the License Working Group?
Seems like there shouldn't be any issues as it's
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote:
The one that I'm somewhat mixed on is the classification of all the minor
roads in rural MB; Canvec has all the all the gray roads in the example
link above listed as tertiary. Given that I know these roads to be
nothing more
9 matches
Mail list logo
