Hi all,
I've see an increased use of block paving as a road surface on new housing
developments. Example image:
http://cms.esi.info/Media/productImages/38030_1338993270237_PF.jpg
How are people tagging these? At first I wondered about the
highway=living_street tag but the wiki page suggests
Hi Rob,
I know others have mapped as in your first suggestion, but I'm strongly in
favour of the second. Living Streets have particular regulations whereas
modern estate roads (usually cul-de-sacs) do not.
It is sometimes worth ascertaining if the block-paved sections are adopted
highways, where
On 31/08/14 13:30, SK53 wrote:
It is sometimes worth ascertaining if the block-paved sections are
adopted highways, where they only occur at the ends of streets. In some
cases these may just be a shared-access driveway. Not always easy to do
of course.
My impression is that councils are very
On 31/08/14 13:47, Rob Nickerson wrote:
The one I saw the other day was a reasonably long loop road. It would
expect it to either be maintained by the Local Authority or the Housing
Association,
In my experience, housing association roads, created in the last decade
or so, are most unlikely
On 2014-08-31 12:51, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
I've see an increased use of block paving as a road surface on new
housing developments. Example image:
http://cms.esi.info/Media/productImages/38030_1338993270237_PF.jpg
How are people tagging these? At first I wondered about the
I have tended to map sections of residential streets with block paving, no
footways, and either chicanes of just sharp corners to prevent people
driving quickly as living_streets, whether or not they were explicitly
designed as such. These also tend to be exclusively dead-end sections,
rather than
As far as I know for minor roads, I always default to using unclassified or
residential (depending on the surrounding area’s predominant land use). I only
use “Pedestrian” where such sign exists, and “Living streets” for actual home
zones with “home zone” signs, if I ever found one.
Hello,
How should we distinguish the new pedestrian countdown crossings in London?
Should we introduce “crossing_ref=countdown” in conjunction with
“crossing=traffic_signals” as the unified description for such crossings, and
similar ones in other cities?
Hi all,
By coincidence, I've just got home from mapping a home zone
signposted area - first time I've seen one. I'm tagging it as
living_street. Here it is:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4004201
I would say do not use the tag just because of seeing block paving on
the street. As far as
Dont know, but I have pictures of a few. They also exist in Caceres, Spain
and Tallinn, Latvia.
Jerry
On 31 August 2014 20:16, Amaroussi-OSM kurias...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
How should we distinguish the new pedestrian countdown crossings in
London? Should we introduce
On 31/08/14 21:28, SK53 wrote:
Dont know, but I have pictures of a few. They also exist in Caceres,
Spain and Tallinn, Latvia.
I first encountered them in China about 13 years ago.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Block paving is very common for residential streets in the Netherlands, so
that's not really enough to distinguish a living_street.
I'd keep highway=living_street for (at minimum) single surface, no clear
distinction between where cars and pedestrians go, and no clear straight
route for cars.
12 matches
Mail list logo
