[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Hockley Flyover art

2014-10-26 Thread Andy Mabbett
I used to drive under and over Hockley Flyover daily, but I never knew about the artwork(s) there, by William Mitchell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Mitchell_(sculptor) until today. See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/seva_nmb/7865992708/in/pool-1910185@N24/ and other pics there.

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Hockley Flyover art

2014-10-26 Thread Rob Nickerson
I recognise that artist's work! He has a piece in Coventry too. I was pretty sure I'd mapped it and could just add the wikidata tags but turns out I was wrong. Anyway it's now mapped and includes wikidata tags and the English Heritage listed status tags:

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Retail chains

2014-10-26 Thread SK53
The tag addr:place has been used to locate one element inside another addressed element. See this example for shops within a Tesco Extra store http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5CN. This usage is useful but probably a little difficult to consume, particularly as there seem to be rather more usages of

Re: [Talk-GB] RFC Mechanical edit: UK Shop Names

2014-10-26 Thread Dan S
Hi all, Coincidentally, I noticed this online project to maintain a list of canonical names. It's used for auto-suggest in iD, not for mechanical-edit: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index I've checked the list against Matthijs' proposal, and I've proposed a few of his suggestions to

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place (was: UK Retail chains)

2014-10-26 Thread Andy Street
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:28:42 + SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote: The tag addr:place has been used to locate one element inside another addressed element. See this example for shops within a Tesco Extra store http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5CN. Surely that could be inferred from the fact that the

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place

2014-10-26 Thread Will Phillips
On 26/10/2014 10:36, Andy Street wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 07:28:42 + SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote: The tag addr:place has been used to locate one element inside another addressed element. See this example for shops within a Tesco Extra store http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/5CN. Surely that

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place

2014-10-26 Thread Andy Street
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:11:39 + Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding has always been that addr:place is similar to addr:street, except when the unit in question isn't a street but some other grouping of addresses such as a business park, retail park or shopping centre,

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place

2014-10-26 Thread Chris Hill
On 26/10/14 19:02, Andy Street wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:11:39 + Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding has always been that addr:place is similar to addr:street, except when the unit in question isn't a street but some other grouping of addresses such as a business

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place

2014-10-26 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:27:11 + Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Hello Chris, Like you, I live in a different parish than the one RM route my post through. spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal town. Postal I agree it's a shame that so many people attribute so much

Re: [Talk-GB] addr:place

2014-10-26 Thread phil
On Sun Oct 26 2014 19:34:14 GMT+ (GMT), Brad Rogers wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:27:11 + Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Hello Chris, Like you, I live in a different parish than the one RM route my post through. spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal

Re: [Talk-GB] addressing (was addr:place)

2014-10-26 Thread Andy Street
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:27:11 + Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: We in OSM can do SO much better and we must not use the imaginary, spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal town. Postal towns are not real and have no place in OSM. Okay, now I'm confused! I know what

Re: [Talk-GB] addressing (was addr:place)

2014-10-26 Thread Chris Hill
On 26/10/14 21:58, Andy Street wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:27:11 + Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: We in OSM can do SO much better and we must not use the imaginary, spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal town. Postal towns are not real and have no place in OSM.

Re: [Talk-GB] addressing (was addr:place)

2014-10-26 Thread Lester Caine
On 26/10/14 21:58, Andy Street wrote: We in OSM can do SO much better and we must not use the imaginary, spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal town. Postal towns are not real and have no place in OSM. Okay, now I'm confused! I know what Royal Mail considers my address to

Re: [Talk-GB] Mechanical shop edits (Was: RFC Mechanical edit: UK Shop Names)

2014-10-26 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 24 October 2014 19:07, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote: Could you indicate how these changes relate to the Nottingham tagging scheme? Were all old tags seen as correct by your scheme? SK53, you haven't responded yet to this question. I think it's important to join the

Re: [Talk-GB] addressing (was addr:place)

2014-10-26 Thread Andy Street
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:41:56 + Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Addresses are allocated by Local Authorities, not Royal Mail. I use the address the LA recognise, plus the postcode which, AFAIK, Royal Mail do issue. I was aware that LAs have a role in numbering and naming new streets

Re: [Talk-GB] addressing (was addr:place)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Black
In my local area all addresses within a postcode district share the same post town. .. Which is the norm. Wikipedia says : In a minority of cases a single number can cover two post towns - for example, the WN8 district includes Wigan and Skelmersdale post towns