Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Christmas curry

No preferences from me. Will let you and the others within the local area pick :-) Thanks, *Rob* On 5 November 2017 at 16:35, Brian Prangle wrote: > Sounds good to me. It's in my diary.Anyone got any preference for a good > curry house? > > Regards > > Brian > > On

[Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

Thanks Andy. Any talks you recommend us watching? I can recommend the following: https://2017.stateofthemap.us/program/building-community-in-south-florida.html 90% imported automatically, the remaining 10% left to the local community. Seems like engaging with them is hard at this stage even

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

On 3 November 2017 at 17:51, Ilya Zverev wrote: > First, thanks everyone for checking the import. I've made some improvements > regarding addresses, and I removed the "operator" tag. You can see the > improvements on the same map. I'd like to join Richard in a search for a >

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Christmas curry

Sounds good to me. It's in my diary.Anyone got any preference for a good curry house? Regards Brian On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Hi all, > > A few years ago the Mappa Mercia group decided to make our December > meeting a "Christmas curry".

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Proposed Import of West Mids VMS Locations

Hi everyone I'd like to open a discussion here first before opening it to talkgb and talkimport The raw data can be found here It covers the West Midlands and parts of the M1 and M69 also Licence is OGL I've edited the data to give

[Talk-GB] Prow_ref format

>I recommended BY for consistency with the other two-letter >abbreviations (FP, BR, RB) that were more universal. +1 Given that there is little internal consistency within each LA and that these are rarely even marked on the ground, my preference would be to stick with the standard as described

Re: [Talk-GB] Prow_ref format

Hi, I agree with what Robert has said and think he has clarified many points admirably. I think we need to be clear that in many cases what we will be recording under prow_ref is a working reference used in the council's GIS system, not part of the definitive official record of rights of way.

Re: [Talk-GB] Prow_ref format

On 4 November 2017 at 17:49, Dave F wrote: > I've started adding Prow_ref=* to the paths within my Local Authority. I've > been using the format as decided by them. > > I noticed another mapper has already added a few, but using the format by > Barry Cornelius at

Re: [Talk-GB] Prow_ref format

On 2017-11-05 00:52, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > Comments inline. > > On 04/11/2017 20:07, Adam Snape wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm of the view that using a standard format would be rather unlikely to >> result in confusion in correspondence with the LA, but am equally happy with >> using the LA's