4 lip 2019, 19:28 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In OSM we map *physical* objects only.
>>>
>>
>> In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop but
>> where there
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 06:49:10PM +0100, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/2019 16:59, Silent Spike wrote:
> >
> > My understanding is that `public_transport=platform` is any place where
> > public transport can be accessed
>
> Same as bus_stop/tram_stop, you mean?
>
> > and should
On 04/07/2019 18:51, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
These are still 'physical' in the sense that they exist in the timetable
& Naptan documents. (Think also boundaries which don't have dashed lines
painted across fields)
This strikes me as a strange definition of "physical" and could cover
In OSM we map *physical* objects only.
What about border - especially
lower administrative units and
nature reserves?
From a previous post:
These are still 'physical' in the sense that they exist in the timetable
& Naptan documents. (Think also boundaries which don't have dashed lines
On 04/07/2019 16:59, Silent Spike wrote:
My understanding is that `public_transport=platform` is any place where
public transport can be accessed
Same as bus_stop/tram_stop, you mean?
and should not literally be interpreted as
a physical platform
then why hi-jack the word 'platform'
This is getting a little bit off topic. I guess to bring things back on
track, would there be any objections to an import along these lines:
1. Import data specifically for the Aberdeen admin area (ATCO code 639)
2. Import stops of type BCT ("On-street Bus / Coach / Trolley Stop.")
3.
On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
In OSM we map *physical* objects only.
In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to
stop but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter.
These are still 'physical'
4 lip 2019, 17:11 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
>
> In OSM we map *physical* objects only.
>
What about border - especially
lower administrative units and
nature reserves?___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 04/07/2019 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to
stop but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter.
Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM?
(following a previous discussion on this list) I've used
"physically_present=no"
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:40 PM Martin Wynne wrote:
> In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop
> but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter.
>
> Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM?
>
> The wiki for highway says "Can be mapped more rigorously using
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:10 PM Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
>
> Please, please don't use public_transport=platform unless you're
> actually mapping an actual, physical, raised object, similar to railway
> platforms.
>
> It has now been regressed one stage further, being superfluously added
> to
On 04/07/2019 16:11, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
In OSM we map
*physical* objects only.
In rural areas there are many places where buses are timetabled to stop
but where there is nothing physical -- no signpost or shelter.
Are these highway=bus_stop in OSM?
The wiki for highway says "Can
Hi everyone
I'llbe surveying the industrial estate behind Morrisons Buntsford Park Road
Rgds
Brian
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
naptan:verified=no dates back to the original import in 2009 and was there
to indicate the bus stop needed surveying to verify its position- when a
survey was done the process was for this tag to be deleted. Might be good
to adopt this process here too?
Regards
Brian
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at
Please, please don't use public_transport=platform unless you're
actually mapping an actual, physical, raised object, similar to railway
platforms.
'platform' has been misappropriated from the physical railway=platform
by those who developed the PT schema to mean an arbitrary area of
It's also useful to add
shelter=yes if there is one
route_ref= x;y indicating bus route nos that stop there (if indicated on
the stop)
CUS stops are also useful to add but omitting the highway=bus-stop tag (
you can always add the public tranpsort stop_poisition as a node on the
highway). They
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:07 AM Ed Loach wrote:
> highway=bus_stop
> public_transport=platform
> source=naptan
> naptan:verified=no
> name=(NaPTAN name)
> naptan:AtcoCode=(whatever)
> naptan:NaptanCode=(whatever)
>
> If the bus stop type is not MKD I add
>
> naptan:BusStopType=(bus stop type)
>
My first thought is recycling points. My second is (related to the
quarterly project) solar panels.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:39 AM Gareth L wrote:
> Mapillary imagery is readily available in the iD editor and also the
> traffic sign detections data that they derive from it. Their computer
>
Mapillary imagery is readily available in the iD editor and also the traffic
sign detections data that they derive from it. Their computer vision efforts
also detect a plethora of other items, to varying levels of accuracy on
detection and triangulation.
They recently wrote a blog post about
19 matches
Mail list logo
