On 6 June 2013 10:59, sk53.osm wrote:
> One thing which concerns me is the 'private' release of Open Data. A number
> of counties have given ProW data to persistent pesterers (not meant
> perjoratively) apparently under a suitable license. I'd far rather see this
> published on the official websit
Hi Jerry,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:59:11 +0100, "sk53.osm"
wrote:
>...
>One thing which concerns me is the 'private' release of Open Data. A
>number of counties have given ProW data to persistent pesterers (not
>meant perjoratively) apparently under a suitable license. I'd far
>rather see this publi
k I used HCC data to add a missing segment of path - so it
looks like I'll have to chop that one out.
Nick
-"sk53.osm" wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg
From: "sk53.osm"
Date: 06/06/2013 10:59AM
Cc: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" ,
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, sk53.osm wrote:
One thing which concerns me is the 'private' release of Open Data. A number
of counties have given ProW data to persistent pesterers (not meant
perjoratively) apparently under a suitable license. I'd far rather see this
published on the official websites of the
Hi Nick,
We have Open Data locally for Nottingham ProW (significant because the city
was exempt from maintaining a definitive map until recently). So far all I
have done is added ref information to paths already mapped. Even with open
data the situation is still confusing: for instance a footpath
Hi,
Just wondering what the current state of what we can do with the UK council
footpath open data is?
Generally I don't just copy the data into OSM anyway: it's more fun to survey
:-)
However I'm wondering whether we can do this?
1. Use the council data to verify whether a footpath surveyed
6 matches
Mail list logo
