On 23/11/16 09:53, Warin wrote:
A 'mobile' business .. such as a mobile caterer or a mobile mechanic may
not be something that needs to present on the OSM map? I'd think someone
looking for a mobile service would want to contact them by phone .. and
be best served by using a phone search.
Here is an example that is more like the startup business that Warin
mentions
Chillie Sauce
112 Barnett Road
Brighton
BN1 7GH
Business type: Other catering premises
http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/904285/
https://goo.gl/maps/SMDjwS1efVL2
Regards,
Jez
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016
Here is an example:
The wonderfully named "Here Today, Scone Tomorrow"
http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/892292/ at 35 Sandgate Road,
Brighton, BN1 6JP
Business type: mobile caterer
https://goo.gl/maps/dKVXCkPHRTo
Perhaps they prepare the food at their home address? or this is their
There's a cupcake business locally which I suspect is a home business
(as the streets in that area are only residential AFAIK). I haven't
actually been there to check it out.
Steve
On 22/11/2016 15:54, Dave F wrote:
I think they're misusing 'private' where they mean 'personal'
I've only
On 22/11/2016 15:22, Dave F wrote:
Are you now suggesting the electoral roll should be hidden? Please
don't assume duplicating freely available data in OSM makes it
'personal' or somehow tainted.
It is possible to be 'ex-directory' in relation to the electoral register.
--
Steve
---
This
I think they're misusing 'private' where they mean 'personal'
I've only come across instances of mobile retailers. Does anyone have an
example of a home business on the FHRS website?
If there's only a partial address/postcode how are OSM contributors
adding them?
Are the co-ordinates
On 22/11/2016 13:41, David Woolley wrote:
On 22/11/16 12:45, Dave F wrote:
Please clarify exactly what data you believe to be personal? As it
contains no data on "identifiable living people", could you provide
evidence that it falls under the DPA?
Occupation.
There's no correlation to an
On 22/11/16 12:45, Dave F wrote:
Please clarify exactly what data you believe to be personal? As it
contains no data on "identifiable living people", could you provide
evidence that it falls under the DPA?
Occupation.
(Real name and address can be obtained by anyone from the edited
On 22/11/16 12:58, Dave F wrote:
On 21/11/2016 20:23, SK53 wrote:
A bit late, but according to the FHRS manual businesses run from
private addresses should be obscured (usually at the postcode district
level).
Do you have a link?
On 21/11/2016 20:23, SK53 wrote:
A bit late, but according to the FHRS manual businesses run from
private addresses should be obscured (usually at the postcode district
level).
Do you have a link?
Not all authorities follow these rules; I have in the past had to
point out to one authority
On 21/11/2016 13:38, Harry Wood wrote:
"Apart from size, I fail to see the difference"
Well the difference is whether you can go there and see the business.
The effect of this verifiability rule might be a size thing, which might mean
that the cottage industry baking cupcakes doesn't get added
On 21/11/2016 13:18, David Woolley wrote:
On 21/11/16 12:58, Dave F wrote:
The FHRS database listing a business at a domestic address is
verification IMO.
It's also personal data. I actually thought that FHRS itself
suppressed some of this, but if you include it, it becomes subject to
the
A bit late, but according to the FHRS manual businesses run from private
addresses should be obscured (usually at the postcode district level).
Not all authorities follow these rules; I have in the past had to point out
to one authority that showing the private addresses of childminders raises
t; Harry
>
> From: Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>
> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Sent: Monday, 21 November 2016, 12:58
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS and businesses run from home
>
>
>
> OSM became a company list as soon as t
e, then we are just copying a
database in.
Harry
From: Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, 21 November 2016, 12:58
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS and businesses run from home
OSM became a company list as soon as th
On 21/11/16 12:58, Dave F wrote:
The FHRS database listing a business at a domestic address is
verification IMO.
It's also personal data. I actually thought that FHRS itself suppressed
some of this, but if you include it, it becomes subject to the Data
Protection Act, which put legal
OSM became a company list as soon as the third business was added. Lists
of things is what the database is all about, it's just that the most
common way of representing them is geographically spaced out on a map,
instead of an Excel spreadsheet.
Apart from size, I fail to see the difference
You beat me to it. I was going to raise this. IMHO we should not add
private home businesses. It just won't be possible to give 100% coverage of
fhrs ids
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:17 Ian Caldwell,
wrote:
> One I noticed was the local country market
One I noticed was the local country market (country-markets.co.uk), the
FHRs address was, I assume, the home of the ore fhrs:id. ganise and was not
where the market takes place. It takes place in a local hall. I was
planning not to map the fhrs:id.
Ian
On 19 November 2016 at 16:48, Andrew Hain
On Sat Nov 19 16:48:23 2016 GMT, Andrew Hain wrote:
> Some FHRS entries refer to people's names, or to business names, with the
> address of a private house. These may be people who cook from home or
> itinerantly. Is it however appropriate for OSM to map these addresses as
> anything more than
Some FHRS entries refer to people's names, or to business names, with the
address of a private house. These may be people who cook from home or
itinerantly. Is it however appropriate for OSM to map these addresses as
anything more than houses, for example by adding fhrs:id or the name in the
21 matches
Mail list logo