: SK53 <sk53@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 1 September 2017 at 18:50
To: Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk>
Cc: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OSM feature density vs edits per features
I suspect the problem with Leice
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 12:04 +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> One thing you won't be short of is the sheer volume of data. If you
> like a challenge, go for it - but I suspect that you might be better
> starting with somewhere with fewer variables if you want some
> quantifiable results to come
Disclaimer: I suppose I'm a former member of the London OSM community, and
now only visit occasionally.
I'd add that it's worth noting OSM in London has history similar to the
city it's self. It's not a typical city/town, but many small villages that
expanded & grew with centres that then merged
Hi
One specific possibility: I know that at least a handful of people have
been deliberately filling out London's buildings, and in un-surveyed areas
this is often by tracing building shapes from aerial views. This is
motivated by London's "patchy" coverage: areas where mappers live, plus
On 01/09/2017 10:55, Neil Matthews wrote:
Not a member of the London OSM community, but...
Also, do you think that there might also be an effect from "visiting"
OSM contributors to an area?
I used to regularly walk to/from occasional meetings with companies in
London and map items on the
Dear all,
my name is Stefano, and I am a lecturer in geography at the University of
Leicester. Volunteered geographic information and OSM have been one of my
research interests for a few years now. I have also done some very minor
contributions to OSM myself, but never in London and I am not
6 matches
Mail list logo
