Michael,
Yes, I stand corrected: the tracks have been lifted here but everything
else is very visible.
The old (< 2015) rendering of the Standard Layer (which was until recently
available on http://tile.openstreetmap.fr and perhaps still is elsewhere)
did show this feature.
Andy,
I'm loath to
Assuming you are talking about this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201674137
Nothing to do with disused=yes - it's not rendered because it's marked
as railway=abandoned, which is the correct way to tag a former railway
line where the tracks have been lifted but the route is still
On 11/02/17 13:43, Paul Berry wrote:
Thirded.
Examples abound but an egregious one, in this context, is the south
side of Leeds City Centre where you have the Holbeck Viaduct with its
92 brick arches 3 stories high marching across the urban landscape. An
extremely visible structure in
Thirded.
Examples abound but an egregious one, in this context, is the south side of
Leeds City Centre where you have the Holbeck Viaduct with its 92 brick
arches 3 stories high marching across the urban landscape. An extremely
visible structure in reality but rendered invisible on all the main
On 2 November 2017 13:23:53 GMT+00:00, ael wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +, Dave F wrote:
>> >
>> > o Another is railways - I'm guessing you'd want to remove the
>rendering
>> > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones,
>
>But please
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +, Dave F wrote:
> >
> > o Another is railways - I'm guessing you'd want to remove the rendering
> > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones,
But please render existing bridges: these are quite common in Cornwall
and are highly significant
6 matches
Mail list logo