WessexMario wrote:
I'll go through that stretch of the canal and tag it more appropriately,
removing the parts that are only proposed, and putting more appropriate
tags on the bits that are visible.
Thank you :) I think it's fine to have the remaining and disused parts
of the canal
James Davis wrote:
Whilst the actual junction has been completed, as far as I'm able
to tell the new route is very much 'proposed' and subject to
planning, and no firm route or timescale have been agreed
on. I'm not sure that this makes the sort of feature that should
be included yet. Are
There's a feature in my local area and I'm not sure it should be
included - it's the proposed new cut of the Wilts Berks Canal, so that
it can join the Thames at a new junction rather than the original
junction which has been developed over.
Whilst the actual junction has been completed, as far
Hi James,
I added that a while back when I first started using OSM, there were a
few considerations I had then which I now realise aren't the 'OSM way'.
I wanted to map the whole route of the canal which, as you are probably
aware, is being restored,
As the canal has been disused for 100 years,
4 matches
Mail list logo
