On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:24:44 +
John Aldridge j...@jjdash.demon.co.uk wrote:
Hello John,
In one case, the location of the path is clear, because it runs between
two walls and the green Public Footpath signs are present, but a
section of it has become completely and densely overgrown with
On 26/01/13 14:41, Brad Rogers wrote:
John Aldridge j...@jjdash.demon.co.uk wrote:
In one case, the location of the path is clear, because it runs between
two walls and the green Public Footpath signs are present, but a
section of it has become completely and densely overgrown with
brambles. It
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:56:53 +
Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Actually, AIUI, the landowner can't be forced to, but if the landowner
won't reinstate and clear the path, the council must. The council can
then charge the full cost of them doing so to the landowner
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 10:09 +, John Aldridge wrote:
All this discussion of rights of way reminds me: is there a consensus
about how (and whether) to map rights-of-way which are either impassable
or invisible?
I've encountered examples of both round here, and have so far chosen not
to
Report the problem to your local authority who have a legal obligation to sort
it out with the landowner. My local councils do sort it out, occasionally they
need a reminder, but it is worth the effort.
I only add a PRoW if I have surveyed it on the ground, so if it is impassable I
would not
On 25/01/2013 10:09, John Aldridge wrote:
I've encountered examples of both round here, and have so far chosen
not to map them at all, on the grounds that we're trying to map the
actual state of the ground, not some legal fiction.
We should be mapping to both conditions, If, on the ground,
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:58 +, Dave F. wrote:
Blockages of ways are often just temporary.
I disagree with Andy Street's comment:
If you can't traverse a right of way then it shouldn't have a highway
tag.
Okay perhaps I could have been clearer but I wasn't suggesting omitting
the highway
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 18:52 +, Andy Street wrote:
when someone builds a house over a public right of way
Does that happen often? Is there not some requirement to then knock the
house down again if it's blocking a right of way?
hen
___
Talk-GB
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:01 +, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 18:52 +, Andy Street wrote:
when someone builds a house over a public right of way
Does that happen often? Is there not some requirement to then knock the
house down again if it's blocking a right of way?
it as official in OSM and the source is the notice board,
otherwise I guess they can only mark it as a path.From: h...@cantab.net
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:01:42 +
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Invisible/impassable rights-of-way
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 18:52 +, Andy
On 25/01/2013 18:52, Andy Street wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:58 +, Dave F. wrote:
Blockages of ways are often just temporary.
I disagree with Andy Street's comment:
If you can't traverse a right of way then it shouldn't have a highway
tag.
Okay perhaps I could have been clearer but I
11 matches
Mail list logo
