Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Hi all, The OSM data for the FHRS comparison tool > hasn’t been updated for a few days because – as Robert Whittaker mentioned – the Geofabrik extract hasn’t been updated in that time. You can of course

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Dear all, The FHRS/OSM comparison tool > has some new features which should help with the Autumn Quarterly Project

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

ing issue for displaying at the bottom of each page the age of the OSM data used <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/4 <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/4>>. Best wishes, Greg > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:48, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> w

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

e also modified most links so that they open in a new tab/window by default as it seems more useful to be able to keep the map view open in the original tab/window. Thanks, Greg > On 16 Oct 2016, at 22:22, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for providing this t

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

es you to the FHRS page <http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/71808/> (N.B. the FHRS ID is therefore 71808) and you can copy the address details into OSM. Hope that helps. Thanks, Greg > On 6 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

The problem with Birmingham, Glasgow and Leeds only having max. 5000 FHRS establishments is now fixed. <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/22> Happy mapping! Greg > On 6 Nov 2016, at 14:11, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > T

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

ssible. You can follow its progress on GitHub: <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/21>. You can continue to use the tool but the data was last updated on Tuesday morning rather than this morning. Thanks, Greg On 30/09/16 17:11, Brian Prangle wrote: > Hi everyon

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

the graphs, you can find the RMarkdown code on GitHub here: [https://github.com/gregrs-uk/fhrs-osm-stats <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/fhrs-osm-stats>] Thanks, Greg. > On 29 Oct 2016, at 13:17, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg > > The first

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

suggestions. The graphs have been created using freely available software (R and RStudio) so if anyone would like access to the code, please let me know and I can pop it on GitHub. Thanks, Greg > On 18 Oct 2016, at 20:28, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > I’ve

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

, the districts with the most recent progress, the number of districts with zero matches and how that has changed, and the number of districts with certain levels of completeness (i.e. a histogram). Watch this space! Thanks, Greg > On 18 Oct 2016, at 19:31, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

have to put the address details into JOSM manually, but you could use the FHRS links on nearby blue dots to find these. Thanks, Greg > On 16 Oct 2016, at 22:22, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for providing this tool, Greg. I've found it very useful so fa

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

These district statistics CSV files will now be copied each day to http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/ <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs-stats/>, so there will be a file per day in case anyone would like to track progress. Thanks, Greg > On 9 Oct 2016, at 21:00,

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

; once the tool runs this evening. Thanks, Greg > On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:58, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > In case it's useful for tracking, you can get the full list of tags used > by my comparison tool at the link below. The tool downloads nodes/ways > with th

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

in the table at the bottom of each district page that don't match with the FHRS database). Thanks, Greg. On 02/10/16 22:19, Neil Matthews wrote: >> 1.We have a great tool > <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/>developed some time ago by > gregrs, whose work we shoul

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

with an fhrs:id and any nodes/ways with one of the tags listed here: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/blob/master/filter-osm.sh#L5-L13) Thanks, Greg ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

In case it's useful for tracking, you can get the full list of tags used by my comparison tool at the link below. The tool downloads nodes/ways with those tags and any nodes/ways with an fhrs:id tag set. https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/blob/master/filter-osm.sh#L5-L13 Thanks, Greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

suggestions in one place in case I get some time (possible in late October / early November). Thanks, Greg On 02/10/16 22:19, Neil Matthews wrote: > Tool looks good, but is there any way to get a feature request: to > identify items in the fhrs data that don't match to OSM in a

Re: [Talk-GB] Summer quarterly project

, or to add feature requests to the issue tracker there, that way I can make the most of any time I do have to improve the code. Thanks, Greg. On 13/09/16 15:55, Dave F wrote: > I'd vote for fhrs:id as the next project. I'm about half way through for > my LA. (I also like Greg's trigpoint da

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

/groups/trigonomy/info as another source of flush bracket numbers, but I haven’t asked them about licensing, nor have I contacted anyone from the Trigpointing website at this stage. Thanks, Greg. > On 2 Sep 2016, at 00:05, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > Co

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/5 <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/5> again Thanks, Greg.___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

. Thanks, Greg. P.S. I’m not on Twitter but I believe someone tweeted @drsiant about my code. She probably won’t have seen the latest link for the entire of GB though so feel free to share it! > On 2 Sep 2016, at 12:38, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > and have y

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

be obtained here: [http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org]. Thanks, Greg. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016, at 08:08 PM, Greg wrote: > I'm pleased to say that I have had confirmation from Ordnance Survey > that their triangulation station data can be used under the Open > Government Licence v3. I have d

[Talk-GB] Tools for using Food Hygiene data e.g. quickly adding addresses/postcodes

/python-fhrs-osm] Thanks, Greg. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

and the large number of 'man_made=survey_point's already in the database in order to determine whether it might be feasible/useful to import/merge the data. It looks like similar data has been imported from IGN in France. Of course I won't do this until it's been properly discussed. Thanks, Greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

Thanks David. I have contacted OS using the contact form on their website in the hope that they may publish the data under the OGL. I think it would be helpful in accurately determining imagery offset. Thanks, Greg. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 09:00 PM, David Woolley wrote: > On 16/08/16 15

[Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

an angle (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_of_simple_building_outlines). Best wishes, Greg. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Tools for Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) data

Hi Rob, Thanks for the kind words. I'd be happy for you to post it to Mappa Mercia. Best wishes, Greg. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Hi Greg, > cc talk-gb (certainly helpful to post there). > > This looks great. One that would benefit the wider

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Tools for Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) data

intervals. The code and software it uses (Python and PostGIS) are freely available though and I'm happy to help someone get it up and running. Thanks, Greg. On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Brian Prangle wrote: > Hi Greg > Fantastic resource!  Thanks for your effort here. I'll start

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Rugby tonight

be able to survey some more of Bilton in due course. See you later! Thanks, Greg. On 05/08/15 09:15, Brian Prangle wrote: Hi everyone I'll survey the missing roads showing up just south of Junction One Retail Park then do some retail surveying in the centre of town See you

[Talk-GB] OSM sighting on ferry

, but I could be wrong. Greg ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Recovering a relation?

gone. However I discovered a piece of the relation today: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/99494605 Would it be possible for somebody to restore this relation? (I understand that given the time that has passed since the deletion, it may not be feasible.) Best wishes, Greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Moving Scotland, England, N. Ireland and Wales relations to admin_level 3

I don't object, but when you're done is there any chance you could update the wiki page's United Kingdom row? I think it is pretty out of date! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level Thanks Greg. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB

Re: [Talk-GB] Worrying Edits in Southampton

I've sent a friendly message to the user, asking if they want any help, that sort of thing. But regardless of whether these edits were intentional or accidental, they are destructive, and I agree with Nick that they should be reverted. Greg, On 12 June 2010 07:57, Greg Auger gregory.au

[Talk-GB] Worrying Edits in Southampton

to do that) Any thoughts? Greg Auger ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Vandalism in Kent/London area

How do you revert it? I don't see any button for that in the changeset viewer on Potlatch. And for that matter how do you view changesets usefully in Potlatch? All it seems to show me is the current view with no way to view the before and after or other indication of what the change was. -- greg

Re: [Talk-GB] Vandalism in Kent/London area

will happen if the changeset is reverted. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb