Hi All,
I agree that prow:ref would work well (although I guess there is a
risk that the 'p' might get missed sometimes). If you are looking for
another suggestion how about designation:ref as the ref is directly
related to the designation=row type? This suggestion was inspired by
the current
- Original Message -
From: Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com
To: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW Ref tagging when ROW is also a road
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst rich
On 20 June 2012 12:44, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
I like the idea of prow:ref. I think footpath:ref a bit too specific, we'd
then need bridleway:ref, not to mention boat:ref (for byways open to all
traffic) which could be just TOO confusing!
[snip]
In the UK at present there
Longwood Lane when driving a car along it looks pretty much like a normal
highway, although it is rather narrow. It has an asphalt surface, and when
turning in from the north, or south there is nothing to show there is
anything special about this road at all from a vehicles point of view.
David Groom wrote:
However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath
sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road,
and the definitive map shows this as a footpath.
I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended for
administrative usage,
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
David Groom wrote:
However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath
sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road,
and the definitive map shows this as a footpath.
I use
Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended for
administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
Now that sounds like tagging for the renderer.
How dare you! :p
In road terms, there is a
On 19 June 2012 14:13, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended for
administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
Now that sounds
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:33 +0100, Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:13, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I use admin:ref for refs that are
On 19 June 2012 12:59, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
a) Not a problem at all;
b) simply a problem for the rendering, and no change to the tagging is
required;
c) a possible problem with the tagging?
I'd say c). It seems to me like the road reference number (e.g. A514)
and public
On 19 June 2012 14:11, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended for
administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
Now that sounds like tagging for the renderer.
No, that's not true. Please see
11 matches
Mail list logo
