Hi all,
The "suggested matches" in greg's tool* has this useful "add tags in
JOSM" link when you click on a dot. Does anyone know of a way to do
this in bulk? (Yes I'm aware of the perils of bulk edits - just want
to do what I would be doing anyway but with fewer clicks...)
Cheers
Dan
* e.g. ht
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 325,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8195/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM is brought to you by ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Ava
This has opened something of a can of worms.
I decided, on reviewing the wiki, to go back to the contractor and ask for
equivalency between access:psv=* and psv=*. And I then decided to check other
tagging equivalencies, such as foot=* and access:foot=*. There a larger number
of access:foot tag
This is the downside of the free tagging system!
It makes no sense having both tags - indeed this should be thrown as an
error in the editors (what happens if the value differs between these
tags?!).
But as you found out, as soon as you propose a (relatively simple) edit
then one individual can b
AFAIK all access:psv=yes have been added by one person. Has anyone actually
talked to kevjs1982? He may be perfectly happy for the tags to be changed.
By discussing things with him you may also a) learn why he used the tag; b)
persuade him to use psv=yes.
The dual use of foot=yes & access;foot=yes
Rob Nickerson wrote:
> I understand this to be "easy" for data consumers
It is indeed easy. There are 442,133 instances of foot=* in the UK and 748
of access:foot=*. That makes it a nice easy decision for the data consumer
not to bother supporting access:foot. ;)
cheers
Richard
--
View this m
>> AFAIK all access:psv=yes have been added by one person
Not entirely. At least one was added at Castleton Bus Station by a certain user
SK53 ;) (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40426231).
But to the more substantive question, no - I had picked two at random, found
them both to be edited by d
That's a long time ago. This is not really something I map very much at
all, so I would tend to have to look for a convenient example. I assume
that's what happened in this case & of course I would look somewhere I know
like Nottingham.
You are very free to change that to psv!
On that note I see
Isn't bus just a hyponym of PSV anyway? PSV also includes taxis, just
like motor_vehicle includes car.
On 2016-10-14 17:33, SK53 wrote:
> That's a long time ago. This is not really something I map very much at all,
> so I would tend to have to look for a convenient example. I assume that's
> w
That was my understanding, yes. PSV is a wider-ranging mode than just bus.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 14 Oct 2016, at 16:43, Colin Smale
mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>> wrote:
Isn't bus just a hyponym of PSV anyway? PSV also includes taxis, just like
motor_
10 matches
Mail list logo