Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Hi all, The "suggested matches" in greg's tool* has this useful "add tags in JOSM" link when you click on a dot. Does anyone know of a way to do this in bulk? (Yes I'm aware of the perils of bulk edits - just want to do what I would be doing anyway but with fewer clicks...) Cheers Dan * e.g.

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

This has opened something of a can of worms. I decided, on reviewing the wiki, to go back to the contractor and ask for equivalency between access:psv=* and psv=*. And I then decided to check other tagging equivalencies, such as foot=* and access:foot=*. There a larger number of access:foot

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

This is the downside of the free tagging system! It makes no sense having both tags - indeed this should be thrown as an error in the editors (what happens if the value differs between these tags?!). But as you found out, as soon as you propose a (relatively simple) edit then one individual can

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

That's a long time ago. This is not really something I map very much at all, so I would tend to have to look for a convenient example. I assume that's what happened in this case & of course I would look somewhere I know like Nottingham. You are very free to change that to psv! On that note I

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

Isn't bus just a hyponym of PSV anyway? PSV also includes taxis, just like motor_vehicle includes car. On 2016-10-14 17:33, SK53 wrote: > That's a long time ago. This is not really something I map very much at all, > so I would tend to have to look for a convenient example. I assume that's >

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

AFAIK all access:psv=yes have been added by one person. Has anyone actually talked to kevjs1982? He may be perfectly happy for the tags to be changed. By discussing things with him you may also a) learn why he used the tag; b) persuade him to use psv=yes. The dual use of foot=yes &

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

>> AFAIK all access:psv=yes have been added by one person Not entirely. At least one was added at Castleton Bus Station by a certain user SK53 ;) (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40426231). But to the more substantive question, no - I had picked two at random, found them both to be edited by

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

Rob Nickerson wrote: > I understand this to be "easy" for data consumers It is indeed easy. There are 442,133 instances of foot=* in the UK and 748 of access:foot=*. That makes it a nice easy decision for the data consumer not to bother supporting access:foot. ;) cheers Richard -- View this

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

Hi Rob, I didn't manage to find that part of the Wiki! So thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will take a look later. Regards Stuart Sent from my iPhone On 13 Oct 2016, at 23:34, Rob Nickerson > wrote: Stuart, Putting