Rob Nickerson wrote:
> I understand this to be "easy" for data consumers
It is indeed easy. There are 442,133 instances of foot=* in the UK and 748
of access:foot=*. That makes it a nice easy decision for the data consumer
not to bother supporting access:foot. ;)
View this message in context:
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Talk-GB mailing list