Hi all,
I don't have time to check it in full right now but I saw a suspicious
edit crop up today in Coventry
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43006455 Given that they titled
the shop 'lol' I'm guessing it is semi-deliberate vandalism. I seem to
remember that we have a process in place
On 19 October 2016 at 10:22, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Robert...are you going to rerun it? or set it to automatically rerun?
The OSM data for
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/osm-errors.html comes from
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/ and it's currently the
Fantastic tool Rob -fixed most of South Birmingham using it.
On 18 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I've been adding quite a few new addr:postcode tags as part of the
> quarterly project to use the FHRS data, I began wondering what
Robert...are you going to rerun it? or set it to automatically rerun?
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 at 10:11 Brian Prangle wrote:
> Fantastic tool Rob -fixed most of South Birmingham using it.
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 00:42, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
>
There is this max height map http://maxheight.bplaced.net/ (wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxheight_Map)
But it seems to be inaccessible at the moment.
Perhaps a mail to the author (mmd) will revive it ?
regards
,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:29 PM, bivand paul
A year ago there were two users adding lots of these restrictions. One
of them was working for piemapping.com who make money out of routing for
commercial clients. They ended up getting blocked and promptly stopped
their OSM activities. I would hate to think that others might be put off
by this...
On 19 October 2016 at 13:29, bivand paul wrote:
> Just saw this on BBC.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37703556
>
> As OS seem to scent £££, this may be an opportunity for us to help out...
Looks like it's the same product as this announcement:
On 2016-10-19 15:55, Dave F wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was the thread's originator.
>
> I haven't rechecked all their changesets, but from memory they didn't add any
> restrictions, just split roads, apparently at random points. Thanks for the
> reminder that I need to go a reconnect them.
>
> Did
Just saw this on BBC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37703556
As OS seem to scent £££, this may be an opportunity for us to help out...
Some easily gettable wiki guidance on mapping height and width restrictions for
the UK and maybe a quarterly project in the future sounds possible.
Chris Hill-6 wrote
> Very useful lists. I've fixed the HU mistakes the list highlighted. One
> thing that did jump out at me is that a postcode was added to the area
> of a school rather than one of the buildings. Is this common practice?
I agree the lists are very useful and I see I have
Hi
I was the thread's originator.
I haven't rechecked all their changesets, but from memory they didn't
add any restrictions, just split roads, apparently at random points.
Thanks for the reminder that I need to go a reconnect them.
Did they ever come back with a satisfactory explanation
11 matches
Mail list logo