Mar 20, 2019, 1:24 PM by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 18:12, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com
> <mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>
>> Mar 19, 2019, 5:04 PM by >> a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
>> <mailt
Yes, the same applies to wikidata tag, should have the same prefix.
(replying not to ml due to digest thing)
Mar 19, 2019, 8:44 PM by colmmoor...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> I'll sort out the memorials. :) If one does subject:wikipedia does one also
> need to do subject:wikidata ?
>
> Some less
Mar 20, 2019, 1:01 PM by marc.ge...@gmail.com:
> AFAIK, one should use the main language of the area in which the
> feature is located. I think it is supposed to follow the language used
> to determine the name tag.
> So for the Belgian/Flemish town Antwerpen (Antwerp in English), you
> should
Mar 19, 2019, 6:13 PM by r...@technomancy.org:
> On 19/03/2019 09:49, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>> Old style wikipedia link is one where language is stored in key, not in
>> value.
>>
>> For example "wikipedia:en=Ireland" is an old style link, w
Mar 19, 2019, 5:11 PM by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
> This is why its batter to tag with Wikidata IDs.
>
My favorite form is both wikipedia and wikidata tag,
wikipedia tag is human readable while wikidata is more stable
and allows easily follow article name changes.
Mar 19, 2019, 5:04 PM by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 08:49, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com
> <mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>
>> For example "wikipedia:en=Ireland" is an old style link
Mar 19, 2019, 3:10 PM by r...@technomancy.org:
> I'm not sure why one would bother with this, but whatever.
>
It went as follows:
- I made small prototype tool listing tourism attractions based on OSM data
- during development I discovered massive amount of broken wikipedia and
wikidata tags
-
Mar 19, 2019, 2:04 PM by colmmoor...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> 1. If it makes things easier for people, then go for it.
>
> 2. I add the wikipedia tag to> a variety of objects, not just geographical
> entities. Why won't these be converted?
>
wikipedia tag is supposed to be specifically about
Old style wikipedia link is one where language is stored in key, not in
value.
For example "wikipedia:en=Ireland" is an old style link, while
"wikipedia=en:Ireland" is a form that is currently standard.
Many old-style Wikipedia links remain and updating them to new style
manually is boring,
28 Apr 2019, 18:23 by webmas...@killyfole.org.uk:
> they are constantly being vandalised, mainly by inexperienced
> users not understanding the relations and removing/amending ways without also
> fixing the relations.
>
I would use other word like "broken", "vandalised" implies that it is
ere's got
> to be something better than using the task manager to kill it !:-)
>
> cheers
>
> Ken
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 18 Nov 2019, 22:42 by montg...@fuse.net:
>>
>> > What software wo
18 Nov 2019, 22:42 by montg...@fuse.net:
> What software would you recommend? ArcGIS, QGIS, JOSM. I could pick up
> any. I would appreciate your suggestions and links to any tutorials to
> learn such software.
>
I recommend
- iD for newbie friendly editing,
- StreetComplete Android app for
Can you share exact location where it was happening?
You can also try reporting issue at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD
You can also try switching to https://preview.ideditor.com/master (development
version,
ahead of a released one - may contain new bugs, but also fixes to bugs. Has a
> Dave
>
>
> On Sat 25 Jan 2020, 07:51 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie, <>
> talk-ie@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>> 24 Jan 2020, 23:05 by >> davecor...@gmail.com>> :
>>
>> > I'm wondering if there is something I'm missing her
24 Jan 2020, 23:05 by davecor...@gmail.com:
> I'm wondering if there is something I'm missing here. Why are we not
> tagging buildings with the correct tagging?
>
building=yes is correct
Adding specific building type is also
correct and desirable, but mapping all
buildings as building=yes is
hem all as
> houses since that would be the least wrong tagging overall.
>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, 08:48 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie, <>
> talk-ie@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>> It is typically much faster to add just
>> geometries. Maybe whoever was do
May 15, 2020, 00:04 by davecor...@gmail.com:
> The fact that so many buildings are being mapped as building=yes when more
> accurate tagging is plainly obvious makes this an utterly frustrating
> project.
>
> Saying that others can come along after and correct it is a totally
> avoidable
both building=residential and landuse=residential
are valid tagging
(though, if possible then building=house
or other more specific value is preferable)
May 14, 2020, 12:47 by t4d...@gmail.com:
> The residential tag should be used for an area not a house.
>
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 14:38,
Is it a former administrative boundary?
I would comply delete it if it no longer
administrative boundary.
11 Sep 2020, 13:27 by br...@hollinshead.net:
> Under Si 615 of 2018 many of the LEAs in Dublin were altered. After
> creating the new ones, I added historic=yes and end dates to the ones
Oct 18, 2020, 11:59 by br...@hollinshead.net:
> As part of my researches into what features we have on OSM that might
> interest someone wishing to make use of outdoor facilities, I find on the
> Island of Ireland we have close to 3,300 parks to choose from, wow!
> (leisure=park). On closer
did. without me knowing
> the local conditions.
>
Yes, it would require verification.
From your email I understood that
you verified some cases and found it to
be a bare grass area without park.
>
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 13:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie <
> talk-ie@openstreetma
For start note
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
- but fixing your own edits falls under one of exceptions
Typical such edit would use Overpass Turbo
( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_turbo ) to
find elements for editing and exporting it to either
Sep 20, 2020, 11:20 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
> wrote:
>
>>
>> For start note
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
>> - but fixing your own edits falls under
Disclaimer: I never visited Ireland
27 paź 2020, 14:41 od colmmoor...@hotmail.com:
> 3. Holy wells, mass rocks and the like. These are predominantly Roman
> Catholic, but possibly with pagan origins.
>
Are they still used by pagans/new age people? For OSM purposes current usage
matters, not
Oct 30, 2020, 14:51 by colmmoor...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies to the list and Mateusz for the confusion. :) Also apologies if I
> step on religious toes.
>
>> From: Mateusz Konieczny
>> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=*
>>
>&
0.0% 16
> 0.5%
> Quaker1 0.0%0.0% 1
> 0.0%
> Other/Unknown9 6.7% 90.3%
> Total 3,106 100.0% 134 100.0%
I am really sorry for offtopic and quoting offlist message. Not sure what
happened,
I just used standard reply.
Oct 28, 2020, 19:54 by talk-ie@openstreetmap.org:
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
