To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk-ie] Administrative Boundary -v- Boundary
Hi,
I tidied up the boundary of Cruiserath townland in Dublin
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5409087#map=15/53.4170/-6.3773 if
someone could check it. I'm not happy that I got it all correct.
Looking
Hi Colm,
I tidied up the boundary of Cruiserath townland in
Dublinhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5409087#map=15/53.4170/-6.3773 if
someone could check it. I'm not happy that I got it all correct.
which relation(s) are you talking about? please give us
Hi,
I tidied up the boundary of Cruiserath townland in Dublin
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5409087#map=15/53.4170/-6.3773 if
someone could check it. I'm not happy that I got it all correct.
Looking at some of the adjacent townlands, especially those to the south, some
seem to have
Hi,
Yes, admin_boundaries should be relations (multipolygons) with this tags:
type=boundary, boundary=administrative, admin_level=XX, name=YY.
area=yes is not needed, because boundaries are always closed (or should
be ;)) and are describing an area.
Just to be shure i checked Velur Ward IV
In response to why the boundary line is not visible, I'm not sure but the
lines I have seen are just marked as 'boundary=adminstrative', nothing
else. e.g. for way 433778075.
Also most boundaries are marked as a relation, not as a way. And then the
relation should be named. You can look at the
, 2012 15:09
To: Bégin, Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary
The levels in your initial email
Available administrative boundary will be included in the next release of
Canvec.osm. From the wiki, here is the tagging values I'm going to use...
Municipal
in Québec)
Regards,
Daniel
_
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: February 9, 2012 17:15
To: Bégin, Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary
Can you give an example of a municipal regional or upper municipality?
Looking at the global
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: February 14, 2012 14:57
To: Bégin, Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary
From the wiki, those look consistent with what I've seen locally, although
naturally I
)
Regards,
Daniel
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: February 9, 2012 17:15
To: Bégin, Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary
Can you give an example of a municipal regional or upper municipality? Looking
Bonjour again!
Available administrative boundary will be included in the next release of
Canvec.osm. From the wiki, here is the tagging values I'm going to use...
Municipal Regional: boundary=administrative; admin_level=5
Upper municipality: boundary=administrative; admin_level=6
Subject: [Talk-ca] Administrative Boundary
Bonjour again!
Available administrative boundary will be included in the next release of
Canvec.osm. From the wiki, here is the tagging values I'm going to use
Municipal Regional: boundary=administrative; admin_level=5
Upper municipality
I would also suggest that these features in the .osm file not be closed –
just have the boundary, don’t handle it like lakes where you have multiple
areas you need to join where they cross tile bounds.
I agree; this can be especially problematic when the split objects end
up being
i also tweeted about it yesterday
Sam Vekemans
@acrosscanada Sam Vekemans
[CivicAccess-discuss] What's doing in Montreal? Re: Montréal Ouvert in
the Gazette #opengov #montreal #quebec #canada http://post.ly/1G8Lk
19 hours ago via Posterous
Perhaps a way to help is to join in the existing
13 matches
Mail list logo
