It's amazing that they seem to make the data so hard to get at, given
that the objective is to get people to use public transport.
Are they really generating serious revenues from this data?
Cheers
Chris
On 24/08/09 21:45, Peter Miller wrote:
On 24 Aug 2009, at 20:18, Péter Connell wrote:
Nice article here:
http://blog.okfn.org/2009/08/20/where-is-the-nearest-bus-stop-uk-department-for-transport-adds-naptan-data-to-open-street-map/
--
Frankie Roberto
Experience Designer, Rattle
0114 2706977
http://www.rattlecentral.com
___
Talk-transit
That said, I don't think one way or node can belong to the same relation
more than once! So you wouldn't be able to map the 'loop' perfectly yet.
Of course it can and it should in such case!
member type='node' ref='D' order='1' /
member type='node' ref='C' order='2' /
member
nice one jeff!, I really hope to visit puerto princesa again :D
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:36 AM, maning
sambaleemmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice work jeff!
http://osm.org/go/4nF853b
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most
that's something i would check yeah. but how much i would check depends on
the ammount of POI's :P if there are 10, checking every single one
would be a bit time consuming.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:29 AM, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Joel
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Joel joelheeth...@gmail.com wrote:
that's something i would check
yeah. but how much i would check depends on the ammount of
POI's :P if there are 10, checking every single
one would be a bit time consuming.
I didn't mean manually, you'd use a query to find out if
I'm not sure how to do that, but i'll try to figure it out if importing this
data is legal.
I've also managed to get some POI data in GPX format, how do i go about
importing that? i tried JOSM, but couldnt figure it out. (sorry for being
off-topic)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:20 AM, John Smith
Joel wrote:
In the 2nd message on this page you'll read With regards to intellectual
property, Wiktude.me will be implemented under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License.
Could anyone give an answer wether it is legal to import POI
location+information from
Thanks for the info!
to bad though, would have been a nice addition.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Joel wrote:
In the 2nd message on this page you'll read With regards to intellectual
property, Wiktude.me will be implemented under a Creative
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
It isn't legal, because the locations are derived from Google Maps.
This is basically a mashup based on Google Maps. I was unaware that Google
have claimed any rights over POIs added in such mashups (Google My Maps
They do hold the rights to the location of the POIs when based on Google
maps. but not the information embedded in the POI.
i think that if the POIs were placed on Yahoo's photos it would be legal
(seeing as they gave permission to trace photos)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Gustav Foseid
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Joel joelheeth...@gmail.com wrote:
They do hold the rights to the location of the POIs when based on Google
maps.
I have tried to find something in their terms that verifies this, but have
not found anything. Could you please be a bit more specific?
Even if
Gustav Foseid wrote:
This is basically a mashup based on Google Maps. I was unaware that Google
have claimed any rights over POIs added in such mashups (Google My Maps or
other sites). Could you provide some more details?
Getting any information out of Google as to what they do claim, and
Gustav Foseid wrote:
That is, however, something different from clearly stating It isn't
legal,
because the locations are derived from Google Maps.
You're right. Brevity never really sits well with geodata copyright. :(
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:18 +0200, Joel wrote:
They do hold the rights to the location of the POIs when based on
Google maps. but not the information embedded in the POI.
i think that if the POIs were placed on Yahoo's photos it would be
legal (seeing as they gave permission to trace photos)
XAPI is intended to provide capabilities that are not available with the
standard API. It is not intended to duplicate the API capabilities. So the
quick answer is use the API if you want to get a way by id.
The longer answer is that it could be implemented in XAPI fairly trivially,
and was
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:56:00 +0200, Alexander Klink o...@alech.de wrote:
Sorry, didn't think about that. I've changed the bot to use
osm.org, my bots will use that right away, I hope the other
bot owners will update as well.
What's the URL for the code, again, for those of us running the bot
hi!
but XAPI is also intended to take load off the API, right? so it might
be a good idea to implement these simple query functions.
my 2cts
cheers
gerhard
gary68
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 07:31 +0100, 80n wrote:
XAPI is intended to provide capabilities that are not available with
the
What's the URL for the code, again, for those of us running the bot who are
daft enough to have deleted that original email?
Take a look into the Archives:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-August/040750.html
Peter
___
talk mailing
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean, but the stop sign does NOT apply to just an
intersection - it applies to a way(s) AND an intersection. This is
because the applicability of the stop sign at an intersection might
depend on your
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction
this page says that you have highway=construction along with any other highway
tag eg highway=trunk
this use is now outdated with API=6 as only one highway tag is allowed.
advice please?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean, but the stop sign does NOT apply to just an
intersection - it applies to a way(s) AND an intersection. This is
because the
Gary68 schrieb:
hi!
but XAPI is also intended to take load off the API, right? so it might
be a good idea to implement these simple query functions.
actually, no. The XAPI was really written to answer types of queries
where the API would not cope, or the API was not made for (give me every
Liz schrieb:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction
this page says that you have highway=construction along with any other
highway
tag eg highway=trunk
this use is now outdated with API=6 as only one highway tag is allowed.
advice please?
highway=construction
Liz wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction
this page says that you have highway=construction along with any other
highway
tag eg highway=trunk
No, it doesn't (unless I'm missing something). It says that construction
uses the /value/ of other highway tags:
hi,
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
I listed :backward and :forward postfixes for access keys
What you are doing here seems like picking raisins from conditional
tagging and trying to handle it as a special case. I'm not sure whether
you are aware of my proposal?
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:47:14 +0200 (CEST), Christiaan Welvaart
c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
hi,
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
I listed :backward and :forward postfixes for access keys
What you are doing here seems like picking raisins from conditional
tagging and trying to
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You say the node when you mean a node somewhere near the node.
near means where the sign is.
I prefer 1) for a number of reasons. IMHO, 2) and 3) are more or less
attempts to mimic 1) in order to avoid using a relation.
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not againt relations when it is adding information. If
I have a
100 meters way and a single stop sign node 5 meters before
the
intersection, It is just waste of time and resource to add
a relation
for something obvious. I have better
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
This whole argument seems to be about tagging for routing software which is
as bad as tagging for render.
What's so bad about sticking a stop node 3-5m before the intersection, after
all how many junctions have a
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Gary68 g...@gary68.de wrote:
hi!
but XAPI is also intended to take load off the API, right? so it might
be a good idea to implement these simple query functions.
Yes, it does now help to take the load off the main API so there is some
sense in implementing
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
advice please?
highway=construction
construction=residential or motorway or whatever
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/23 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Morten Kjeldgaardm...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
hard-to-verify data - I don't see why incline=* is any harder to
verify than ele=* - as you said yourself, if you have one you can
calculate/verify the other...
I think
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:47:14 +0200 (CEST), Christiaan Welvaart
c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
hi,
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
I listed :backward and :forward postfixes for access keys
What you are doing here seems like
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:31 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
This whole argument seems to be about tagging for routing software which is as
bad as tagging for render.
What's so bad about sticking a stop node 3-5m before the intersection, after
all how many junctions have a stop
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not about tagging for routing software.
Then what is it?
I'll ask again, how many stop signs appear after you go through an intersection?
In my experience the answer is none, so it's a simple calculation to establish
which
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a different stance - I am against using anything that isn't a
relation when a relation is necessary.
no problem with that.
And a relation is necessary
when a tag involves an inseparable interaction of ways/nodes,
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
Or we could just always use a relation, so that mapping and
software
don't have to check for two different things, when editing
and
processing data respectively.
Or in other words, tagging for the routing software, this
On 25/08/2009, at 10:22 PM, John Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
Or we could just always use a relation, so that mapping and
software
don't have to check for two different things, when editing
and
processing data respectively.
Or in other words,
On 25/08/2009, at 9:37 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
What is everyone's preference? I quite like the relation described at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop
In fact, that relation avoids the need to split the way at the
junction if the stop sign applies in
Hi
take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.18236lon=-44.91328zoom=15layers=B000FTTT
In fact there are 3 ways in the middle of the ocean, but the object-list
shows 9 - each of them 3 times:
* Way 35373399
* Way 35373587
* Way 35373412
* Way 35373399
* Way
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
1) a relation with the node and the way as members, as in,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop)
2) the way tagged with indirect reference to the node (i.e. start or
end node of way)
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 02:48:26 pm Peter Körner wrote:
In fact there are 3 ways in the middle of the ocean, but the object-list
shows 9 - each of them 3 times:
What are these way doing there ?
Can anyone reproduce this problem?
The problem is not specific to the area. This one give me the
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:34:52 + (GMT)
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll ask again, how many stop signs appear after you go through an
intersection?
I'm a little tired of reading about this, so I'm going to contribute my
two cents:
Almost every intersection I've seen has the
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
Sorry, I had a typo in that sentence - it should read so
that mappers
and software As well as software, it makes it easier
for mappers
who wouldn't have to check arbitrary nodes around a
junction.
No, the easiest thing
I just tried to apply the 'architects' convention' of steps 'always' being from
bottom to top. Then for unrelated reasons I reversed the way. Unlike 'oneway'
this does not reverse the direction of the steps - i.e. the software doesn't
know about the architects' convention. So I have to conclude
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Joseph Booker j...@neoturbine.net wrote:
Almost every intersection I've seen has the stop sign *at*
the
intersection.
The intersection is the middle of the two or more ways intersecting, the stop
sign is always before the intersection, not at the intersection.
Here,
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:06:19 +0200
Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) a relation with the node and the way as members, as in,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop)
2) the way
2009/8/25 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
How can mapping out a node not be simple? It is a lot simpler than mapping
out a relation or splitting a way etc etc etc and the only thing that
benefits from stop sign information is routing software, editors don't,
mappers don't so making it
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Joseph Bookerj...@neoturbine.net wrote:
According to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop ,
it seems like you would just have 3 relations. The first relation would
include the node for the top intersection and the two
Vincent MEURISSE schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 02:48:26 pm Peter Körner wrote:
In fact there are 3 ways in the middle of the ocean, but the object-list
shows 9 - each of them 3 times:
What are these way doing there ?
They were added by a new OSMler. He was notified and the ways were
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Joseph Booker j...@neoturbine.net wrote:
It's not a normal traffic light. It is legally and
practically treated
the same as a stop sign. My state describes it as This
sign is used at
intersections when a stop sign alone is hard to see or
where additional
emphasis on the
Pieren wrote:
A small pic is better than a long speach. One example with one major
street and six minor streets all having stops when intersecting with
the major street:
Or three minor roads all crossing the same major one
|
---+---
|
---+---
|
---+---
|
3) add 6
Hereby I would like to announce that YOURS now has the capability to use
the long awaited via points (waypoints) in a route. The code for this
feature has been contributed by Philip Homburg. Web design is still rather
crude, but that will hopefully improve over time.
Last week a few other
Hi all,
Hereby I would like to announce that YOURS now has the capability to use
the long awaited via points (waypoints) in a route. The code for this
feature has been contributed by Philip Homburg. Web design is still rather
crude, but that will hopefully improve over time.
Very cool
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:00:32 +0200, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote:
Very cool feature. But I do have a small nitpick: it looks like you
can't drop a waypoint...
There's the 'clear' button ;-)
Without kidding, being able to remove a single waypoint will be added soon.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not about tagging for routing software.
Then what is it?
It's about choosing the most appropriate way to tag something that
*intrinsically* involves
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:06 PM, James Livingstondoc...@mac.com wrote:
Or we could just always use a relation, so that [mappers] and software
don't have to check for two different things, when editing and
processing data respectively.
Yup.
___
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
First interaction is the coordinates/positions of these elements. We
shouldn't create relations if the information can be deduced from the
positions. We had a similar discussion about identifying all objects
inside a polygon (tag
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Joseph Bookerj...@neoturbine.net wrote:
You gain nothing with the proposals raised compared to relations,
except some avoidance of relations. With relations the tagging is much
simpler, it makes sense intuitively when you come across it in the
data...
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:06 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Have a look at the awful way someone came up with tagging speed cameras, I
couldn't figure it out at the time so I ended up tagging speed cameras as a
single node with highway=speed_camera. Why would making it harder
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Peter Childspchi...@bcs.org wrote:
The only time I can see a relation actually helping is with stuff that
is difficult to map like no left turn
Do you realise why you need a relation for no left turn? It's
because the restriction *intrinsically involves more
Erik Johansson wrote:
BTW. Getting good video audio is hard, it takes money with lots and
lots of time.
As I already wrote, the Chaos Communication Congress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Communication_Congress
also succeeds in producing appropriate videos.
If the videos at SOTM would be
Hello.
I am playing with gosmore a bit but it looks like rubbish :-( It draws
only random ways as vertical and horizontal lines and cannot find even
simpliest ~200m routes. I rebuilt gosmore.pak with only a country osm
file, do I have to use the whole planet for it to work?
--
Było mi bardzo
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that deducing the meaning of a node tagged
with stop
from the positions of the ways and nodes in the vicinity
is equally
clear. I know you disagree.
Pre-processor finds a stop sign, looks for the nearest junction
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that deducing the meaning of a node tagged
with stop
from the positions of the ways and nodes in the vicinity
is equally
clear. I know you
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I still think it isn't best-practice, for the reasons I've
already
described, but I admit it is attractive if you really,
really don't
like relations (for some reason...).
It's not that I dislike relations, I think they're
2009/8/26 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Pre-processor finds a stop sign, looks for the nearest junction node which
it would already know is a junction
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
What about railway crossings? I've seen railway
crossings with no
lights, gates or similar, just a stop sign. Usually
way out in the
middle of nowhere, so there may not be a routable junction
for quite
some distance, and even if
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
What about railway crossings? I've seen railway crossings with no
lights, gates or similar, just a stop sign. Usually way out in the
middle of nowhere, so there may not be a routable junction for quite
some distance, and
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Good point. Also, how about a straight section of road that
becomes
narrow (single lane) in one section, and therefore has a
stop (or give
way) sign on one side of the narrow section. There's no
junction at
all in this case.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Actually there is still a junction from when it goes from 2 lanes to 1 lane,
and the (usually in .au) give way sign is before the junction of the 2 lanes
into one.
Only if the lanes are marked as separate ways, which
--- On Wed, 26/8/09, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Wiki Spam
To: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009, 3:44 PM
Hi,
Absolutely, like a Russian speaking OSMer I can confirm
hmmm, nadat ik dit mailtje heb afgetypt heeft ie de bestemming eindelijk
gevonden. minuten wachttijd is niet echt bruikbaar in mijn ogen...
groet,
floris
Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
ik wil niet al te negatief klinken maar waarom nieuwe features toevoegen
terwijl de basis functionaliteit zelden
I've updated the LC Australia page, I have no idea what people would be willing
to pay to join so I flipped a coin and put it initially at $20/yr or $10/yr for
concession holders.
This is half the amount wikimedia australia has for membership fees and I can't
figure out from their website
Fala galera,
esse camarada criou um bot para publicar os changesets de uma
determinada área no twitter. Já pedi para ele criar o
http://twitter.com/osm_rio
com a bbox da Região Metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro. Se vocês
quiserem bots de outras regiões, mandem um email para ele (ou para mim
e eu
Moin,
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
User Privat schrieb:
Das ein Grundstück (eine Adresse und Hausnummer) mit mehreren Gebäuden
bebaut wird, ist ja nichts Besonderes, aber im allgemeinen gibt es dann
zur Differenzierung für die Gebäude noch interne Bezeichnungen oder Nummern.
Beispiel:
Moin,
Mirko Küster schrieb:
Hast du da mal ein Beispiel fuer? Also PLZ und Straßenname gleich? Ich
kenne
so spontan keines und ich waere davon ausgegangen das bis auf
wirklich seltene historische ausnahmen das tuple PLZ/Straßenname unique
ist vor allem dann wenn es dort wirklich Gebaeude
Moin !
wenn man Tiles berechnet dann oftmals für eine Fläche die rechtecktig
definiert ist.
Damit ergeben sich immer zwangsläufig auch Leer-Kacheln.
Kann man diese irgendwo dran erkennen und ggf. autom. über ein
Perl-Skript z.b. löschen ??
Gruß Jan :-)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:35:13AM +0200, Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
Moin !
wenn man Tiles berechnet dann oftmals für eine Fläche die rechtecktig
definiert ist.
Damit ergeben sich immer zwangsläufig auch Leer-Kacheln.
Kann man diese irgendwo dran erkennen und ggf. autom. über ein
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Moin !
wenn man Tiles berechnet dann oftmals für eine Fläche die rechtecktig
definiert ist.
Damit ergeben sich immer zwangsläufig auch Leer-Kacheln.
Kann man diese irgendwo dran erkennen und ggf. autom. über ein
Perl-Skript z.b. löschen ??
ti...@home macht
ti...@home macht das so, dass er mit der libGD die Kacheln vergleicht,
und wenn eine Kachel komplett weiss oder komplett blau ist, wird diese
jeweils durch ein 67 byte oder ein 69 byte png ersetzt.
Wenn du das direkt auf dem Server implementierst, solltest du jedoch
besser Symlinks verwenden,
Peter Körner schrieb:
ti...@home macht das so, dass er mit der libGD die Kacheln vergleicht,
und wenn eine Kachel komplett weiss oder komplett blau ist, wird diese
jeweils durch ein 67 byte oder ein 69 byte png ersetzt.
Wenn du das direkt auf dem Server implementierst, solltest du jedoch
Dirk-Lüder Kreie schrieb:
Peter Körner schrieb:
ti...@home macht das so, dass er mit der libGD die Kacheln vergleicht,
und wenn eine Kachel komplett weiss oder komplett blau ist, wird diese
jeweils durch ein 67 byte oder ein 69 byte png ersetzt.
Wenn du das direkt auf dem Server
Am 23. August 2009 13:55 schrieb Patrick Hanft patr...@phlogfile.de:
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
verbesserungswürdig finde ich noch etwas untertrieben - für eine
Erstbetrachter ist die Menüführung sehr schwierig und wird wohl in einem
Themenwechsel enden.
Sehe ich zwar ähnlich, ist aber ein
Am Di, 25.08.2009, 13:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Und auch amenity=drinking_water wäre ein sehr nettes Feature in
manchen Gegenden.
Mir wären freie POI-Wählbarkeit und UTM wichtig.
Und dann Vektor-PSFs, die man mit Mapnik und osmarender leicht erzeugen kann.
Am 25. August 2009 01:32 schrieb Garry garr...@gmx.de:
Irgendwie nicht so ganz glücklich...Ist ja doch ehr was eigenständiges (das
zum Teil zwar kombiniert
wird) als eine Untergruppe von Cafe oder Restaurant,
restaurant ist daher auch in unserem Vorschlag nicht vorgesehen, wir
sehen es als
Am 25. August 2009 01:15 schrieb Garry garr...@gmx.de:
Adiac schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
wie taggt man einen Modellflugplatz? Habe dazu nichts gefunden.
Ich zitiere mich :-) :
Diebezüglich gab es schon Diskussionen, ich tagge schon seit einger Zeit
Modellflugplätze.
Es macht Sinn für die
Am 25. August 2009 13:32 schrieb Tobias Wendorff
tobias.wendo...@uni-dortmund.de:
Am Di, 25.08.2009, 13:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Und auch amenity=drinking_water wäre ein sehr nettes Feature in
manchen Gegenden.
Mir wären freie POI-Wählbarkeit und UTM wichtig.
Und dann Vektor-PSFs,
Hi,
bin ich eben per Zufall drüber gestolpert.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.17939lon=-44.90553zoom=15layers=B000FTF
Ich glaube nicht, dass der da hin gehört. Bevor der gelöscht wird, weiß
jemand, wie man herausbekommt, welche User den angelegt hat ?
Grüße
Am 25.08.2009 um 13:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
:
Am 23. August 2009 13:55 schrieb Patrick Hanft patr...@phlogfile.de:
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
verbesserungswürdig finde ich noch etwas untertrieben - für eine
Erstbetrachter ist die Menüführung sehr schwierig und
In Potlatch das Objekt anklicken und h drücken.
Bearbeiter hier ist stoimen erstellt am 2. Juni 09.
Am 25.08.2009 um 13:46 schrieb Ana Luisa Paldos Garcia:
Hi,
bin ich eben per Zufall drüber gestolpert.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.17939lon=-44.90553zoom=15layers=B000FTF
Ich glaube
bin ich eben per Zufall drüber gestolpert.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.17939lon=-44.90553zoom=15layers=B000FTF
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.17939lon=-44.90553zoom=15layers=B000FTF
Ich glaube nicht, dass der da hin gehört. Bevor der gelöscht wird, weiß
jemand, wie man
Am 25. August 2009 13:48 schrieb Jonas Krückel o...@jonas-krueckel.de:
Ja, das Rendering finde ich auch noch verbesserungswürdig.
Eure konkreten Wünsche könnt ihr hier hinzufügen:
http://github.com/migurski/paperwalking/iss
danke, allerdings ist dort soweit ich es sehe eine Registrierung
Hi,
du kannst dir den Data-Overlay anzeigen lassen und dort auch die
History. Dort steht:
Edited by stoimen at 2009-06-02T14:57:05Z
Das würde sich dann also um diesen Weg handeln:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35373399
Grüße, Mats
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:46:17 +0200
Ana Luisa
Am 23. August 2009 21:18 schrieb Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de:
Robert S. schrieb:
Ausgeschnitten werden muss aber nur, was nicht zu so einem Gebiet gehört.
Leider gibt es keine klare Definition, was zu einem Gebiet gehoert und
was nicht (Gehoert z.B. ein Park zu einem Wohngebiet? Oder ein
Moin !
SvenA hat einige neue Straßenverzeichnisse bereitgestellt - vielen Dank
dafür.
Sylt (S-H):
http://svenanders.openstreetmap.de/SV-stat/Schleswig-Holstein/Sylt/
Wedel (S-H):
http://svenanders.openstreetmap.de/SV-stat/Schleswig-Holstein/Wedel/
Celle (Nds):
Kann man das irgendwie mit Flo's Auswertung kombinieren oder stehen
die Listen unter Verschluss, wie von einigen Kommunen gefordert?
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Moin !
SvenA hat einige neue Straßenverzeichnisse bereitgestellt - vielen Dank
dafür.
Sylt (S-H):
Moin,
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 23. August 2009 21:18 schrieb Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de:
= Im Zweifelsfall immer ausschneiden.
+1
Eine Ausnahme mache ich eigentlich nur bei Gebaeuden.
wie meinst Du das denn? Gebäude bestimmen doch - wo vorhanden - gerade
Hi !
Du kannst Dir bei SvenA ein Passwort besorgen - alles weitere findest Du
hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Stra%C3%9Fenverzeichnis#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Gruß Jan :-)
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
Kann man das irgendwie mit Flo's Auswertung kombinieren oder stehen
die Listen
1 - 100 di 225 matches
Mail list logo
