Re: [talk-au] Editing speed limit in Australia

2019-03-08 Per discussione Ross Scanlon
Welcome to oz roads. I had a look on street view and can not see any 60 signs along Warwick Road they are all 70. Cheers Ross On 09/03/19 10:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 08:48, Ross Scanlon > wrote: What you've said is correct for

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
Scusate da telefono non accedo alla sez discussione della wikiproposta... Mi chiedo un paio di cose: "ele" non è di solito riferita al mare? siamo sicuri ci possano essere mappabili solo oggetti historic? Il ven 8 mar 2019, 20:40 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > Ho creato una bozza di

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione canfe
Sì', scusa Martin, refuso: historic Io ipotizzavo che questi due tag potessero essere applicati a building o altri oggetti su cui ci sono le scritte. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [talk-cz] sjezdovky

2019-03-08 Per discussione Marián Kyral
On 09. 03. 19 6:41, Marek Janata wrote: > Ahoj, > > zkusil jsem v JOSM doplnit chybějící vlek a jezdovku ve Zdobnici, ale > výsledek se mi moc nelíbí - > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.23514/16.40184 - jak to mám > vyznačit/označit správně? > Nebo mám jen nakreslit vlek a typ sjezdovky

[talk-cz] sjezdovky

2019-03-08 Per discussione Marek Janata
Ahoj, zkusil jsem v JOSM doplnit chybějící vlek a jezdovku ve Zdobnici, ale výsledek se mi moc nelíbí - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.23514/16.40184 - jak to mám vyznačit/označit správně? Nebo mám jen nakreslit vlek a typ sjezdovky označit do něj? dík moc Marek

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Joseph Eisenberg
Natural=peak must be a local high point, so it has to be at least a few meters higher than the surrounding land. A natural=peak does not have to be the highest point of a mountain, but it has to have some topographical prominence. Not all spot elevations on USGS are of peaks, some are just a

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Kenny
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:46 PM Phil! Gold wrote: > I started work last year on a better system that generates SVGs on the fly > from OSM data, so it doesn't need the pregeneration step. I got bogged > down with other things before I quite finished, but it's mostly there. It's really great

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Bryan Housel
Good question! As others have said - hotels have rooms that open indoors, motels have rooms that open outdoors. That’s the only difference. I did a bit of research on this last year for https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index because

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
As I believe the etymology of the word "motel" (circa 1920s) is a contraction of "motor hotel," I believe it is fair to say that a motel is a hotel which caters to motorists. That is, patrons who arrive in an automobile and wish for it to be immediately accessible, as in parked directly

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Joseph Eisenberg
This was discussed at the main Tagging mailing list a couple of months ago: Start of thread: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-December/041597.html Continuation in January: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/041720.html The wiki page for Motel was

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
I've slept in some pretty nice places that had exterior room access. I wouldn't call that out as the only demarcating property. To my mind it's a combination of location, amenities and layout / architecture. Interesting discussion! Martijn van Exel > On Mar 8, 2019, at 18:03, Tod Fitch

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道拓殖バスオープンデータのインポートについて

2019-03-08 Per discussione Hokkosha
hayashiさま 確認&ご意見ありがとうございます。 「鹿追5号」既存データ確認しました。 地理院オルソ画像で見ても既存の位置が正確そうなので、既存ノードに拓バスデータ のnameほか各タグを追加することにします。 インポート用のアカウントは中の人1人に対し1個作って、OSMアカウントのプロフィール に関与した各プロジェクトのwikiリンクを追加していくつもりで考えていましたが、 どちらがいいんでしょうか? 引き続き皆様のご意見を伺いたいと思います。 なおプロジェクト毎のアカウントだとしても、本アカウントのHokkosha名を含めたものに するつもりです。

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Tod Fitch
For me the difference is interior hallway to access room (hotel) vs exterior access to each room (motel). On March 8, 2019 4:47:33 PM PST, Peter Dobratz wrote: >How do you distinguish between the tourism=hotel and tourism=motel >tags? > >The criteria that I was imagining is that a motel is a

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Ian Dees
I think your description of motels as parking directly outside rooms is good, but I've seen plenty of motels that had multiple stories. Wikipedia's page on motels is good and has this definition: "a type of hotel consisting of a single building of connected rooms whose doors faced a parking lot

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Broderick
I thought the defining architectural difference was whether access to the room was via interior hallway (hotel) or exterior walkway (motel). On Fri, Mar 8, 2019, 19:51 Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On 3/8/19 18:47, Peter Dobratz wrote: > > How do you distinguish between the tourism=hotel and

Re: [Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Shawn K. Quinn
On 3/8/19 18:47, Peter Dobratz wrote: > How do you distinguish between the tourism=hotel and tourism=motel tags? > > The criteria that I was imagining is that a motel is a single story > building where you have the ability to park you car directly outside of > your room. A hotel would be other

[Talk-us] motel vs. hotel

2019-03-08 Per discussione Peter Dobratz
How do you distinguish between the tourism=hotel and tourism=motel tags? The criteria that I was imagining is that a motel is a single story building where you have the ability to park you car directly outside of your room. A hotel would be other types of buildings such as multi-story where most

Re: [talk-au] Editing speed limit in Australia

2019-03-08 Per discussione Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 08:48, Ross Scanlon wrote: > What you've said is correct for off ramps but would be incorrect for on > ramps. > > The on ramp speed limit may be determined from the adjoining road(s), as > the last speed limit sign is the applicable limit until you pass another > sign. > >

[OSM-talk-ie] New Local Electoral Areas 2018

2019-03-08 Per discussione Cormac O Murchú
These are all done now bar in Cork and possibly Dublin counties but don’t import them to maps.openstreetmap.ie quite yet. Could someone update us on Dublin, we do not have an official new Cork City boundary yet and cannot do the MD/LEA updates in and around Cork City yet.

Re: [Talk-it] MAPPATURA CONFINI AMMINISTRATIVI

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
ne abbiamo parlato recentemente e pare che si mappano con admin_level=7 (contradite mi se mi sbaglio). Se tutti sono d’accordo, dovremmo scriverlo nel wiki Ciao, Martin sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 23:05, Alberto Varalli wrote: > > Buonasera, non avendo esperienza sulla mappatura

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

2019-03-08 Per discussione Phil! Gold
* Phil! Gold [2019-03-08 17:44 -0500]: > https://gitlab.com/asciiphil/osm-shields Oops, that's the master branch, which doesn't have the changes. You need to look at the svg branch: https://gitlab.com/asciiphil/osm-shields/traa/svg -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... /

Re: [talk-au] Editing speed limit in Australia

2019-03-08 Per discussione Ross Scanlon
| In some situations, especially on off-ramps, there isn’t any speed limit sign at the beginning of the link only at the end of it or in the | middle. I observed that in these situations the speed limit of the motorway is added on the first part of the link. Because this is the | predominant

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

2019-03-08 Per discussione Phil! Gold
* Kevin Kenny [2019-03-08 14:25 -0500]: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:37 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > > > > I agree that a local US OSM map with a *subtly* adapted rendering would be > > fantastic. Phil Gold did some interesting work years ago on rendering US > > style highway shields taking

[Talk-it] MAPPATURA CONFINI AMMINISTRATIVI

2019-03-08 Per discussione Alberto Varalli
Buonasera, non avendo esperienza sulla mappatura di confini amministrativi vi scrivo per chiedervi come fare a mappare un’insieme di comuni costituenti una UNIONE o una COMUNITA’ MONTANA ad esempio. Vi ringrazio anticipatamente per la collaborazione Saluti Bertu90

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Les contours de la Bretagne

2019-03-08 Per discussione David Crochet
Bonjour Le 08/03/2019 à 22:23, Jacques Lavignotte a écrit : Profites-en pour inclure le Mont Saint Michel... o ! Ho  !! HO !!! H Faut pas pousser mamie dans les orties non plus !! Cordialement -- David Crochet ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Les contours de la Bretagne

2019-03-08 Per discussione Jacques Lavignotte
Le 08/03/2019 à 22:18, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : Comme je suis pour le retour de la Loire-Atlantique en Bretagne, Profites-en pour inclure le Mont Saint Michel... J. le vendredi c'est trolldi. -- GnuPg : C8F5B1E3 Because privacy matters.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Les contours de la Bretagne

2019-03-08 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
(Summary below) J'ai regardé quelques points, ça ne m'a pas l'air d'être complètement le cas. Par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656836115/history#map=9/47.6339/-1.1838 passe de 8/commune (faux) à 6/departement (faux, hélas ;-)). Ça devrait être 4/region.

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Kevin — yes, I was talking about SOTM US. Please do stay tuned to this list and OSM US blog for announcements for community scholarships and other initiatives we will deploy to make it possible to have many more community members attend (and also present! on interesting topics like this one.)

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How to stop violation of OSM copyright by Mapbox?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
to me it seems you did represent facts, although I am not sure I would see the click-to-see attribution on small screens a violation of copyright, I agree it is suspicious that there is space for a mapbox logo but not for an OSM attribution. Cheers, Martin

[OSM-talk-fr] Les contours de la Bretagne

2019-03-08 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Bonjour talk-fr, someone has reported these two changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66342909 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66285978 and said: "Cet utilisateur a rédifini les contours de la Bretagne incluant le département de la Loire Atlantique. Si ce sujet est bien

Re: [OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 11:20 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm : > With today's interactive options, it would indeed be possible to show > the authors of individual features when hovering ;) yes, ALL authors of course, not just the last one ;-) Cheers, Martin

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Fr., 8. März 2019 um 19:49 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi : > Guarda, sinceramente, fate come volete. Io sono per la semplicità, ma qui > sempre più spesso mi sembra di avere a che fare con l'UCAS di Fantozziana > memoria (*ricordate? Ufficio Complicazione Affari Semplici*), e non mi > riferisco

[Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Kenny
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:37 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > > I agree that a local US OSM map with a *subtly* adapted rendering would be > fantastic. Phil Gold did some interesting work years ago on rendering US > style highway shields taking into account (sometimes crazy) route concurrency >

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Sergio Manzi
Guarda, sinceramente, fate come volete. Io sono per la semplicità, ma qui sempre più spesso mi sembra di avere a che fare con l'UCAS di Fantozziana memoria (/ricordate? Ufficio Complicazione Affari Semplici/), e non mi riferisco solo a questo thread, ma un po' in generale, tanto che

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] discrepanza classifica strade su pagina wiki

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 18:16, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Il mio punto è, che finora pensavo che nella gerarchia residential e > unclassified sono sullo stesso livello. Invece nel testo sulla pagina la > versione inglese combacia con quello che penso sia la prassi comune,

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 00:11, Sergio Manzi wrote: > > historic=yes, inoltre, è già ben usato, quindi non mi sembrerebbe una > anomalia... si, ci sono, ma ci sono altri tag molto migliori, che specificano cosa sia. C’è anche highway=road o building=yes più di 5000

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Perhaps they should be tagged not as peaks then but as a place node (place=locality probably)? > On Mar 8, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Mike Thompson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:29 AM Kevin Broderick > wrote: > > Would

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 00:11, Sergio Manzi wrote: > > almeno che non vogliamo taggare anche le pubblicità sui muri, e spero di non > stare suggerendo una brutta idea a qualcuno!) ho creato anni fa un tag per le pubblicità, ha avuto qualche successo (persone che mi

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Mike Thompson
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:29 AM Kevin Broderick wrote: > > Would https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4992960980 be an example of (or > very similar to) what you're talking about? > Yes, slightly different, but same general concept. > I've been told that one is a local reference point ("25

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 00:11, Sergio Manzi wrote: > > ma capisco che a volte l'oggetto in se può essere poco significativo e non > degno di mappatura, mentre l'inscription sì. il fatto che ci sia l’inscription renderebbe l’oggetto degno di mappatura. Potrebbe essere

Re: [OSM-talk] KeepRight might do that already | Re: HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Dave F via talk
Keepright returns far too many false positives (in the UK) to be useful. I'm not an expert, but it seems the further (ie another country) you are away from the server storing the website the less likely Keepright will find it. It makes me wonder if Bryce's script, running from the US, will

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] discrepanza classifica strade su pagina wiki

2019-03-08 Per discussione Volker Schmidt
Il mio punto è, che finora pensavo che nella gerarchia residential e unclassified sono sullo stesso livello. Invece nel testo sulla pagina la versione inglese combacia con quello che penso sia la prassi comune, invece quello italiano dice che residential è "sotto" unclassified. On Fri, 8 Mar 2019

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Mar 2019, at 16:46, canfe wrote: > > Concordo Sergio, e' esattamente quello che avevo proposto: > historical=yes > inscription=* > in modo da non far proliferare i tag come raccomandato. intendi “historic”? Quindi la classe della cosa mappata sarebbe ‘storico’

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] discrepanza classifica strade su pagina wiki

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
mi sembra giusto il testo italiano. Come anche evidenziato recentemente in una lunga discussione su tagging, la classe unclassified viene visto come “quartiary” cioè viene utilizzato per indicare strada di accesso ad un piccolo quartiere (dove la strada non è nemmeno tertiary). Ciao, Martin

Re: [Talk-GB] More imagery

2019-03-08 Per discussione chilton steve via Talk-GB
All, Following on from Rob's email the contact person for Getmapping is: Jake Lauder - jake.lau...@getmapping.com mailto:jake.lau...@getmapping.com Web:http://www.getmapping.com Address: Virginia Villas, High Street, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8NW If making contact I suggest you mention the

Re: [Talk-de] EU-Urheberrechtsrichtlinie: Banner und Aktionsseite für openstreetmap.de

2019-03-08 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
Hi Michael, On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:31:36AM +0100, Michael Reichert wrote: > Hallo, > > in seiner Sitzung hat der FOSSGIS-Vorstand sich vorletzte Woche mit den > gewohnten Veränderungen an openstreetmap.de einverstanden erklärt. Diese > habe ich jetzt vorbereitet. Dabei handelt es sich um: >

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
I agree that a local US OSM map with a *subtly* adapted rendering would be fantastic. Phil Gold did some interesting work years ago on rendering US style highway shields taking into account (sometimes crazy) route concurrency (http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=13=39.75926=-86.02786=B

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Kenny
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:59 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > If it’s just a shortcut to have the main OSM map display elevation in feet, > that’s not right, but it indicates a need that is currently unaddressed: > displaying elevation in local units on the main map. Even as a USAian, I'm fine

Re: [talk-au] Editing speed limit in Australia

2019-03-08 Per discussione Lacramioara Maghiar - (p)
Thanks for your response! I got 80 from the trunk way from which the motorway link leaves. In some situations, especially on off-ramps, there isn’t any speed limit sign at the beginning of the link only at the end of it or in the middle. I observed that in these situations the speed limit of

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
If it’s locally known as such, to my mind, it’s totally fine tagging it that way, even if it’s only by backcountry skiers. I would say this is common in OSM, I see (and appreciate) a lot of named trails that are not always signposted as such but locally known by those names (like

Re: [Talk-it] Tag per Iscrizioni o Epigrafi

2019-03-08 Per discussione canfe
+1 Concordo Sergio, e' esattamente quello che avevo proposto: historical=yes inscription=* in modo da non far proliferare i tag come raccomandato. Ferruccio -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___

[Talk-br] Geometria de lagos com margens muito variáveis

2019-03-08 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
Olá a todos, Tenho atualizado a geometria da Lagoa dos Patos no RS, uma lagoa rasa, com margens quase planas em diversos locais. O nível da água depende das marés próximo do oceano, e dos ventos em terra [1], e com isso às vezes invade áreas com centenas de metros e às vezes mais de um

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Lester Caine
On 08/03/2019 15:15, Brian Prangle wrote: Whilst being immensely useful, Planning Applications are usually heavily annotated as Copyright,  both Crown Copyright and Developer Copyright- so even if the developer gives you permission you're still lumbered with OS encumbrance The site plans may

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Brian Prangle
Whilst being immensely useful, Planning Applications are usually heavily annotated as Copyright, both Crown Copyright and Developer Copyright- so even if the developer gives you permission you're still lumbered with OS encumbrance Regards Brian On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 11:24, Lester Caine wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Bryce Jasmer
Thanks for pointing that out. I have fixed it by redirecting between the two pages. On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:28 AM Michael Reichert wrote: > Hi Bryce, > > Am 22/02/2019 um 08.02 schrieb Bryce Jasmer: > > The wiki page is > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/b-jazz > > I have

Re: [Talk-GB] Fw: Road name contradictions in the UK

2019-03-08 Per discussione Dave F via Talk-GB
On 08/03/2019 10:15, Andy Townsend wrote: OS Locator is/was a good source of those missing names, as shown in "Musical Chairs" here: There's also: http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/ Although don't be deceived by the 'Last Updated' date - It's not being updated. When I

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Philip Barnes
Field boundaries are often retained (development usually takes a field at a time), look out for these. They are a useful guide to aligning stuff with old aerial imagery. Phil (trigpoint) On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 14:38 +, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > Hi > > Welcome to OSM. > > > >

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Dave F via Talk-GB
Hi Welcome to OSM. Mapping new developments is trickier without aerial imagery, but there's quite a bit you can do to make it more accurate than guesswork. * if you're mapping the roads use the GPS to walk down their centre, if it's safe to do so, of course) * Takes *lots* of photos.

Re: [Talk-it] evento su mappatura accessibilità a Milano

2019-03-08 Per discussione Andrea Canevazzi
grazie mille Alessandro per la visibilità sul nostro incontro in AMAT. Spero che alcuni dei mappatori di Milano riescano a passare perchè, oltre ad essere l'occasione per spiegare con maggiore dettaglio le nostre prospettive, sarà anche l'occasione per un uno scambio di opinioni sui prossmi passi

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Kenny
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:38 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > If it is a peak then ele=XXX and noname=yes would be OK. > > If it is not a peak it should not be present at all - otherwise it opens way > to importing > LIDAR data into OSM (and there are datasets with resolution of 5 cm, dumping > it

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Kevin Broderick
To elaborate on my previous response, now that I'm back at a computer: Would https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4992960980 be an example of (or very similar to) what you're talking about? I've been told that one is a local reference point ("25 Short", ie. 25 feet short of 10k), and at least one

Re: [Diversity-talk] Anything happening for Int. Women's Day?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Rebecca Firth
Hi Rory, Thanks for raising the topic! Sharing a blog with a few ways people can get involved in mapping for gender projects https://www.hotosm.org/updates/international-womens-day-2019-number-balanceforbetter/ - and for any YouthMappers on the list, join our competition for the chance to win a

[talk-cz] Témata kvartálního piva v Jiné Krajině

2019-03-08 Per discussione Pavel Zbytovský
Ahoj, nakonec jsme byli v komorním počtu, ale témata byla velmi inspirativní. Třeba někoho také zaujmou: http://bit.ly/2UrIaHg Pavel ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Michael Reichert
Hi Bryce, Am 22/02/2019 um 08.02 schrieb Bryce Jasmer: > The wiki page is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/b-jazz I have seen that you started uploading. Could you please add a link to that wiki page to the profile page of b-jazz-bot or create

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione David Woolley
On 08/03/2019 11:23, Lester Caine wrote: One source of information that I use is the planning application. Although it may also be necessary to ask the builders if you can use it directly. It's a useful background on josm ... when combined with a GPS walk around. Planning applications are

[Talk-it] [talk-it] discrepanza classifica strade su pagina wiki

2019-03-08 Per discussione Volker Schmidt
Ho per caso visto che sulla pagina Highway:International_equivalence nella grande tabella c'è una discrepanza di testo fra l'inglese e l'italiano nella riga "Italiy" nella colonna "unclassified" Il testo inglese dice: "

Re: [Talk-GB] Fw: Road name contradictions in the UK

2019-03-08 Per discussione Brian Prangle
Hi Andy Try OS Open Roads On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 10:16, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 07/03/2019 13:56, Gregory Marler wrote: > > 1) Can you elaborate on the source(s) of suspected road names? > > 2) It would

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Brian Prangle
If you've got no imagery - basically you're stuffed for building outlines except for guesswork ( I tag these as "visual estimate" - sound a bit better). Digital Globe Imagery tends to have more new housing estates than other imagery sets .If you've surveyed an area just add address nodes Regards

Re: [Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione phil
Hi Dave In general new housing is a bit of a best guess and a bit of creative use of gps traces. I use techniques such as walk the roads and cross over, or put a wiggle in, when I am level with the ends of the building. I tend to use those traces locally in josm as they will be a bit odd to

Re: [Talk-es] Etiquetas lcn=yes, principalmente por Madrid

2019-03-08 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
Perdón, si queremos mantener las rutas oficiales del Ayuntamiento aunque no estén marcadas sobre el terreno, en lugar de lcn=X podríamos usar, por ejemplo: type=route route=bicycle network=lcn ref=04 name="Puerta del Sol" operator="Ayuntamiento de Madrid"

Re: [Talk-es] Etiquetas lcn=yes, principalmente por Madrid

2019-03-08 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
Hola, Sobre las lcn=yes: después de revisar el uso de esta etiqueta en Madrid[1] estoy de acuerdo que hay que tomar una decisión y hacer algo con ellas. Según la web del Ayuntamiento[2] hay 13 rutas, 10 de ellas numeradas. Pero creo que no hay nada marcado sobre el terreno (excepto las rutas de

[Talk-GB] How to map new housing?

2019-03-08 Per discussione Dave Abbott
Hi, I'm quite new to OSM, and am wondering how I might go about mapping new housing plots in my area. In general, there is nothing on the imagery - I know I can walk the new streets and map them with GPS - but how to go about mapping the new buildings? Is there a guide I can look at? TIA,

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道拓殖バスオープンデータのインポートについて

2019-03-08 Per discussione yuu hayashi
追記 既存データの確認に下記URLが参考になります https://yuuhayashi.github.io/coverageWeb/busstop.html 毎週火曜に更新しています(月曜時点のデータになります) 我田引水 ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [Talk-GB] Fw: Road name contradictions in the UK

2019-03-08 Per discussione Andy Townsend
On 07/03/2019 13:56, Gregory Marler wrote: 1) Can you elaborate on the source(s) of suspected road names? 2) It would helpful if each of us could look at your list in a more localised aspect. Either including county would be more helpful, or at least having latitude and longitude in separate

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道拓殖バスオープンデータのインポートについて

2019-03-08 Per discussione yuu hayashi
hayashiです 上り下りが分離されたいいデータですね 一箇所「鹿追5号」だけ既存データがあります。名前がないデータですが位置情報は既存データのほうが正確かもしれません。 共同運行のところは Wikiにあるように ノードをわけずに operatorにセミコロンでつないで入れるので良いです。 同じ場所に 会社ごとにポールが2本以上立ってる場合も1ノード(bus platform)でまとめのがいいです。 同じ場所にあるポールで 停留所の名前が路線毎に違う場合も セミコロンでまとめるのがいいです。

Re: [Talk-lt] Hakatonai

2019-03-08 Per discussione Tomas Straupis
2019-03-08, pn, 10:40 Mantas rašė: > Sprendžiant iš anketos, tai norima organizuoti labiau ne hackathonus, o > workshopus? Pagal tavo formuluotę labiau panašu į workshopus. Bet šiaip mintis yra labai laisva. Gali būti viena tema, gali būti kelios. Esmė, kad susitikimo metu būtų vienas ar

Re: [Talk-it] evento su mappatura accessibilità a Milano

2019-03-08 Per discussione Alessandro Sarretta
Non riesco ad essere presente fisicamente, ma seguo con interesse gli sviluppi, se possibile. E complimenti ancora ad AMAT Milano per le iniziative e l'approccio! Ale On 08/03/19 09:47, Alessandro Palmas wrote: Gli amici di AMAT Milano, già presenti su questa lista e attivi anche sulla wiki

Re: [Talk-us] Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet)

2019-03-08 Per discussione Dave Swarthout
This is simply a way to get an otherwise unnamed peak to render and also, I suspect, to sidestep the inconvenience of converting the elevation to meters. AFAIK, there are no peaks with the generic name "Point" on any USGS Topos. In addition, placing the elevation into the name is another trick

Re: [Talk-GB] Road name contradictions in the UK

2019-03-08 Per discussione phil
I have downloaded the spreadsheet and split the lat/lon column into two numeric columns so that I can apply bounding boxes to see what there is within the areas I have knowledge of. Ran out of time but should get to have a look later. Phil (trigpoint) On Friday, 8 March 2019, Andy Robinson

Re: [Talk-GB] Road name contradictions in the UK

2019-03-08 Per discussione Andy Robinson
About 50% of those in the list in my Cheshire patch are one housing estates which are still under construction. I tend to update these about once every three months or so. Cheers Andy From: Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 March 2019 08:58 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Arpav, meteo Veneto, nessuna attribuzione paina dedicata PM10.

2019-03-08 Per discussione Volker Schmidt
Luca Menini, Direttore del Servizio Informatica e Reti at ARPAV. On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 10:07,

Re: [Talk-it] Arpav, meteo Veneto, nessuna attribuzione paina dedicata PM10.

2019-03-08 Per discussione Alessandro Sarretta
Ho segnalato al volo intanto su Twitter: https://twitter.com/alesarrett/status/1103944684836216832 Ale On 08/03/19 01:05, Sergio Manzi wrote: Eh beh, sì... ci dovrebbe proprio stare... Qualcuno ha contatti? Sergio On 2019-03-07 20:38, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu wrote: Segnalo,

[Talk-it] evento su mappatura accessibilità a Milano

2019-03-08 Per discussione Alessandro Palmas
Gli amici di AMAT Milano, già presenti su questa lista e attivi anche sulla wiki (santi subito :-) ), organizzano un incontro su Cartografia e analisi delle barriere architettoniche a Milano venerdì 15 marzo dalle 15,30. AMAT sta avviando la mappatura della rete

Re: [Talk-lt] Hakatonai

2019-03-08 Per discussione Mantas
Sprendžiant iš anketos, tai norima organizuoti labiau ne hackathonus, o workshopus? Arba aš tiesiog klaidingai suprantu terminus. Kiek man žinoma: *hackathonas* - yra ne mokymuisi skirtas renginys, kai dalyviai pasiskirsto į komandas ir dirba prie savo susigalvotų projektų arba visi dalyviai