Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 7/13/2020 4:09 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote: The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least in the US, one does not drive or walk directly up to someone's house without having business there. (Someone making a delivery, obviously,

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

> On Jul 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Jmapb wrote: > (Trying once again to change this thread subject!) > > I'm also in the "worry about it" camp. > > To me, it's sad to see a mapper go to all the trouble of fixing the routing > to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263869602 >

Re: [Talk-GB] Great North Trail MTB Route

[apologies for broken threading, Nabble appears to have fallen over] Chris Fleming wrote: > We also have copyright of the route itself, Cycling UK do seem > to assert copyright and therefore we probably do need them to > ask them. I did ask that very question at a recent Facebook webchat with

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Jul 13, 2020, 20:29 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > On 13/07/2020 14.22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> If you are staying from manually reviewing >> and editing based on this new data, >> aerials and current data it should be >> perfectly fine as long as you actually review >> what you add. >>

Re: [Talk-GB] Great North Trail MTB Route

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 11:04, Chris Fleming wrote: > The third issue is of copyright, which is the one Adam brought up. > Personally I don't really know about this one. On one hand the route is > made of of ways already existing on OpenStreetMap; does that move us a step > outside of copying

[Talk-us] Someone from Craigslist here?

Hi, a recent complaint to DWG led me to investigate the area around Greenville (Plumas County, Northern California), and I found that a couple TIGER streets that had been deleted on OSM in January 2019 were still visible on Craigslist (https://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/craigslist.png shows

Re: [Talk-at] OpenStreetMap in Österreichs Bildung und Lehre, Frage id 70000

Hallo, Vielleicht kannst Du mir aber helfen. Gibt es Arbeiten welche sich mit dem Potential im Einsatz von OpenSource Software wie Fossgis, und OpenStreetMap auseinandersetzen. Es gibt eine Vielzahl akademischer Arbeiten in diesem Bereich. Einfach z.B. hier https://scholar.google.com/ nach

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote: I'll confess to having perpetrated a fair number - at a time when I didn't know better. Likewise. That said... A few things, though: The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least in the US, one does not drive or walk directly

Re: [Talk-GB] Holiday camp tagging

On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 20:47 +0100, David Woolley wrote: > If separate areas have been mapped for tents and caravans, you should > not coalesce them. Is this not the same as amenity=university on each building though? Where the correct method is one closed way or relation with amenity=university

[Talk-GB] Mapping of Dover Harbour Board

Hi, the DWG has received the following message: > Hi, > > A bit of feedback. > The openstreet map of Dover Harbour-UK has now become quite out of date. > Just wondering when it will receive an update after all the works done over > the past 2 years with the Western Docks revival project and

Re: [Talk-GB] Holiday camp tagging

On 13/07/2020 18:19, Cj Malone wrote: 2 - The site is split into areas with names, I've started adding address details to aid in routing, mapping them as addr:housename=area and addr:unit=#. I was originally planning to use addr:place instead of addr:housename, but this specific camp site uses

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:52 PM Jmapb wrote: > I'm also in the "worry about it" camp. > > To me, it's sad to see a mapper go to all the trouble of fixing the routing > to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263869602 by drawing in the > driveway

Re: [Talk-it] Chiusura per lavori

sent from a phone > On 13. Jul 2020, at 18:16, emmexx wrote: > > Ho aggiunto i tag > vehicle:conditional = no @ (2020 July 6-2020 September 6) > foot:conditional = no @ (2020 July 6-2020 September 6) > > Sul ponte passano anche taxi e tram in corsia riservata. Ha senso > modificare i tag

Re: [Talk-it] Chiusura per lavori

On 7/13/20 8:05 PM, Edoardo Yossef Marascalchi wrote: > è cmq utile per calcolare i percorsi del trasporto pubblico che li viene > interrotto Ho aggiornato anche per le way relative ai mezzi pubblici. grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

On 13/07/2020 14.22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: If you are staying from manually reviewing and editing based on this new data, aerials and current data it should be perfectly fine as long as you actually review what you add. For now, yes. For buildings (later, and I'll probably ping y'all

[Talk-GB] Q3 2020 Quarterly project Cycle Infrastructure

Hello, The UK quarterly project for Q3 2020 has been selected as Cycle infrastructure. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2020_Q3_Project:_Cycling_Infrastructure Another topical one with cycling having increased take up as people have avoided public transport or took advantage of the (for

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Ok, then it should be ok. If you are staying from manually reviewing and editing based on this new data, aerials and current data it should be perfectly fine as long as you actually review  what you add. 13 Jul 2020, 20:15 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > On 13/07/2020 13.44, Mateusz Konieczny

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

On 13/07/2020 13.44, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote: Are you sure that it is in public domain? It is according to the government POC. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports-us/2020-July/000954.html -- Matthew ___ Talk-us mailing

Re: [Talk-it] Chiusura per lavori

è cmq utile per calcolare i percorsi del trasporto pubblico che li viene interrotto Il lun 13 lug 2020, 7:16 PM emmexx ha scritto: > A Milano è chiuso per lavori per 2 mesi il Cavalcavia Farini [1]. > > Ho aggiunto i tag > vehicle:conditional = no @ (2020 July 6-2020 September 6) >

[Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 7/13/2020 12:59 PM, Alex Hennings wrote: The /sole purpose/ of routing is to get the user to their destination without breaking any laws. These are also /specifically my/ /goals /when I'm using a router. Frequently (in my rural area) getting to my destination requires using a privately owned

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Are you sure that it is in public domain? Is it work of federal government? Or a state government? 13 Jul 2020, 16:48 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > (Repost to talk-us also.) > > On 13/07/2020 10.44, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> I am working on a project that wishes to tentatively use OSM data

[Talk-GB] Holiday camp tagging

Hello everyone, I'm mapping a local camp site [0], and have a few questions regarding tags. 1 - It's mainly static caravans with some cabins, but it also has an area for tents/caravan pitches. It should tagged as one tourism=caravan_site with tents=yes, right? It's currently split into one main

Re: [Talk-us] Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes (was: Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?)

Kevin, Maybe we have different contexts? In my area, we have privately owned roads that are more than just driveways. Regarding: "*don't worry about it*" I find this dissatisfying. The *sole purpose* of routing is to get the user to their

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ‪airbnb - Philip‬ à supprimer ?

> Le POI n'est pas le seul à cette adresse, il y a aussi un cinéma, le nœud > addr sur l'immeuble était suffisant pour géolocaliser. > Je n'ai pas assez précisé : supprimer les tags du airbnb et surtout garder le point adresse :) > Je crée le POI quand je connais : mais là une maison d'hôtes

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ‪airbnb - Philip‬ à supprimer ?

Le 13/07/2020 à 17:29, Yves P. a écrit : Bonjour, Un POI sur un nœud adresse : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1549564356 C'est une la seule et unique contribution de son auteur. Est-ce que je la supprime ou je créé un POI à coté ? Le POI n'est pas le seul à cette adresse, il y a aussi un

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 13.07.20 15:07, Wolfgang Schreiter wrote: On 13.07.20 11:34, Wolfgang Schreiter wrote: Der Versatz von geoimage zur basemap beträgt ca. 0.13; -0.44 (JOSM Versatz-Einstellungen). Was bedeuten diese Zahlen, und wo kommen sie her? https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/ImageryAdjust

[Talk-it] Chiusura per lavori

A Milano è chiuso per lavori per 2 mesi il Cavalcavia Farini [1]. Ho aggiunto i tag vehicle:conditional = no @ (2020 July 6-2020 September 6) foot:conditional = no @ (2020 July 6-2020 September 6) Sul ponte passano anche taxi e tram in corsia riservata. Ha senso modificare i tag anche per le

[OSM-talk-fr] ‪airbnb - Philip‬ à supprimer ?

Bonjour, Un POI sur un nœud adresse : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1549564356 C'est une la seule et unique contribution de son auteur. Est-ce que je la supprime ou je créé un POI à coté ? __

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

(Repost to talk-us also.) On 13/07/2020 10.44, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I am working on a project that wishes to tentatively use OSM data from Quantico and possibly surrounding areas. Unfortunately, OSM is somewhat lacking in this area, especially within Quantico itself. I would like to import

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] Hatfield, Pretoria - Add Shp File

I'm not sure who would be required to authorise this, but I doubt that anyone would have any objection. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:58 PM Calayde Davey wrote: > > Hello, > > I am working on African Digital Twin cities with University of Pretoria & > Chalmers, Sweden. > > May I have permission and

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Does OSM have a similar concept as the "Organisation" from Mappilary?

Hello, Thank you Rory and Donal for the pointers. I will definitely create a page about the project and update you here at the list. I had a look at the OSMcha, resultmaps and missing maps, but I will explore them a bit more. Thanks a lot, Bianca Pereira Research Associate Applied

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

> Von: Friedrich Volkmann > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2020 14:00 > On 13.07.20 11:34, Wolfgang Schreiter wrote: > > Der Versatz von geoimage zur basemap beträgt ca. 0.13; -0.44 (JOSM > Versatz-Einstellungen). > > Was bedeuten diese Zahlen, und wo kommen sie her?

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 13.07.20 14:34, Wolfgang Schreiter wrote: >> Von: Norbert Wenzel >> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2020 12:56 > >> Leider schaff ich's nicht die Liste zu finden im Wiki, könntest du mir bitte >> den >> Link posten? > > Gerne: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps Vielen Dank. Ich war im

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

> Von: Norbert Wenzel > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2020 12:56 > Leider schaff ich's nicht die Liste zu finden im Wiki, könntest du mir bitte > den > Link posten? Gerne: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps LG Wolfgang ___ Talk-at mailing list

Re: [Talk-at] OpenStreetMap in Österreichs Bildung und Lehre, Frage id 70000

Hallo Manuela, ich selbst bin Nichtakademiker, und kenne mich daher im universitären Umfeld nicht so genau aus. Vielleicht kannst Du mir aber helfen. Gibt es Arbeiten welche sich mit dem Potential im Einsatz von OpenSource Software wie Fossgis, und OpenStreetMap auseinandersetzen. Gerade im

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 13.07.20 11:34, Wolfgang Schreiter wrote: Der Versatz von geoimage zur basemap beträgt ca. 0.13; -0.44 (JOSM Versatz-Einstellungen). Was bedeuten diese Zahlen, und wo kommen sie her? Wenn du in JOSM einen Versatz siehst, wär interessant, was in JOSM lagerichtig ist: geoimage oder

Re: [Talk-es] Ediciones usuario JosefoLGV (o jlcc78)

Hola, En su mensaje a esta misma lista de correo la persona que está detrás del usuario jlcc78 (José Sánchez) afirma [1]: "He sido bloqueado pero sigo trabajando en OSM." Es una verdadera pena que tengamos que estar con estas cuestiones, bloqueando usuarios y que haya personas que realicen

[talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 519

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 519 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/13352 * Rybářské revíry. * Stínování a vrstevnice. * Maďarské cukrárny. * Hranice přírodních parků. * Dočasné cyklopruhy. * Mapillary a neonacisté? * Parkování dle OSM. * Zkušenosti z importu adres. * Zaměstnanci

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

Hi Wolfgang, On 13.07.20 09:45, Wolfgang wrote: > Mit JOSM funktioniert die neue URL, schärfer wird das Bild aber dadurch > (jedenfalls im getesteten Ausschnitt) nicht. Sieht bei mir gleich aus wie > basemap Orthofoto, bloß mit ein paar cm Versatz. > > Hab's im Wiki aktualisiert, wann das

Re: [Talk-GB] Great North Trail MTB Route

On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 13:20, Tony OSM wrote: > So please do not tag as ncn; but please keep as a route. Sustrans are not the only group in the UK that can make signed cycling routes of national-importance, although they are certainly the biggest and most well-known. But if another organisation

Re: [Talk-GB] Great North Trail MTB Route

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 11:04, Chris Fleming wrote: > Secondly unsigned routes, these aren't necessarily great as they can't be > verified on the ground, and often tend to be informal however they are > useful, I cycled a day of the Capital trail last year and it was great being > able to pull

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Black Country Geopark

Hi Andy Great news that this has been achieved after the failure several years ago. Once we have the boundaries from a licence-compatible source I'm happy to complete this. Regards Brian On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 21:04, Andy Mabbett wrote: > Do we have plans to map the new "Black Country

[Talk-es] Ediciones usuario JosefoLGV (o jlcc78)

Buenos días. Aquí un pequeño repaso de las ediciones “cáoticas" del usuario JosefoLGV en la línea de las realizadas por el ahora bloqueado jlcc78. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87891740 Aparte de cambiar el nombre de la N6, el título de su conjunto de cambios lo dice todo: Ggle. name.

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

> Von: Friedrich Volkmann > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2020 10:26 > On 13.07.20 09:45, Wolfgang wrote: > > Mit JOSM funktioniert die neue URL, schärfer wird das Bild aber > > dadurch (jedenfalls im getesteten Ausschnitt) nicht. Sieht bei mir > > gleich aus wie basemap Orthofoto, > > Dann sind

Re: [Talk-es] Ediciones cuestionables usuario jlcc78

Buenas. Saco algo de tiempo para añadir algo más de información. Primero transmitir mi pequeña decepción a la forma de proceder en este caso desde DWG. Entiendo que es un equipo de voluntarios, como somos la mayoría de los que editamos en OSM. Entiendo la tardanza, aunque hay que buscar alguna

Re: [Talk-GB] Great North Trail MTB Route

On 12/07/20 at 02:17pm, Andy Townsend wrote: On 12/07/2020 12:32, Adam Snape wrote: My main concern here is about whether we should be mapping unmarked routes at all and especially whether it is okay to import them without discussion or the explicit permission of the copyright

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 13.07.20 09:45, Wolfgang wrote: Mit JOSM funktioniert die neue URL, schärfer wird das Bild aber dadurch (jedenfalls im getesteten Ausschnitt) nicht. Sieht bei mir gleich aus wie basemap Orthofoto, Dann sind die vordefinierten Einstellungen in JOSM offenbar ungenügend. bloß mit ein paar

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 13.07.20 08:46, Norbert Wenzel wrote: Friedrich, mittlerweile ist ein Mail eingetroffen, mit der Bitte um eine Änderung der URL. Bei mir nicht und bei Robert auch nicht. Geoimage: ich würde Sie bitten, falls nicht ohnehin schon so implementiert, den Geoimage DOP-WMS in ihrer Anwendung

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

Mit JOSM funktioniert die neue URL, schärfer wird das Bild aber dadurch (jedenfalls im getesteten Ausschnitt) nicht. Sieht bei mir gleich aus wie basemap Orthofoto, bloß mit ein paar cm Versatz. Hab's im Wiki aktualisiert, wann das aktiv wird kann ich aber nicht sagen. Übrigens: seit einigen

Re: [Talk-at] OpenStreetMap in Österreichs Bildung und Lehre, Frage id 70000

Zumindest an der TU Wien (wo 2011 ja auch die SotM-Europe veranstaltet wurde) sind Open Source Tools und offene Daten im Geobereich ein wichtiger Bestandteil der Lehre. Auf https://catalogplus.tuwien.at/ kann nach Diplom- und Masterarbeiten gefiltert werden, die an der TU zu dem Thema

Re: [Talk-de] Tagging historischer, aber nicht amtlicher Straßennamen?

sent from a phone > On 13. Jul 2020, at 07:03, Bernhard Weiskopf wrote: > > Für amtliche Namen würde > vielleicht "name:official" passen.) official_name Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

On 06.07.20 12:09, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > Ist es jetzt wieder soweit? geoimage.at-Hintergrund geht bei mir > mindestens seit gestern nicht mehr. basemap.at-Hintergründe gehen noch. Friedrich, mittlerweile ist ein Mail eingetroffen, mit der Bitte um eine Änderung der URL. Geoimage: > ich

Re: [talk-cz] nečeský name=*

Ahoj, já bych tipoval, že ta chorvatština bude spíše němčina, ne? Dalibor From: Jakub Jelen Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 12:12 PM To: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-cz] nečeský name=* Ahoj. Protoze jsem zrovna mapoval 18 polednik v Novem Jicine, vzpomel jsem si na tuto