Re: [talk-au] NSW LPI Data

For OpenAddresses.io we used the NSW_Property endpoint which is listed as CC BY https://github.com/openaddresses/openaddresses/tree/master/sources/au/nsw. Couldn't you have used that either directly or via OpenAddresses? Other endpoints are not listed as CC BY so shouldn't be assumed to be, of

Re: [Talk-at] landuse: line oder multipolygon?

On 25.07.20 15:05, Patrick Strasser-Mikhail wrote: Eine Frage zu Stil und Praktikabilität: Wenn ein detailliert gemaptes Gebiet ohne Lücken mit landuse oder gleichwertig getagt ist, dann stoßen ja immer exakt Flächen aneinander, entweder als geschlossene Linien oder als Multipolygone. Es

Re: [talk-au] NSW LPI Data

Would it be possible to ask for permission for all of the endpoints? On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:42:45PM +1000, David Wales wrote: >Hmm... >We might have a problem then, because we've been using the following >endpoint to generate our address points: >

Re: [talk-au] Show your support of OpenStreetMap in our region: OSMF Application 

Hi Sebastian, Yes it took place and you can find the minutes here . We're just concluding a few things like the final list of people participating and who will lead the working group. The next

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

Hi Skyler, You can use any image hosting site to upload the image, and then post a link here. For instance: https://imgur.com/upload Michał On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 6:50 AM Skyler Hawthorne wrote: > I tried to post a screenshot, but the mailing list has a max size of 40 > KB, > which seems very

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] incontro lunedì

Mi spiace ma lunedì 27 luglio non posso.Sono dispiaciuto, perché avrei partecipato molto volentieri.Dopo tanto tempo.Sigh! Alla prossima___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:14:14 +0200 pangoSE wrote: > Hi > > Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route > relations. I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a > script. I se no loss of information doing that and a benefit to data > consumers wanting to sort and

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

sent from a phone > On 25. Jul 2020, at 12:56, Manuel wrote: > >  Credo anche io si riferisca a iD, che in presenza di un waterway=riverbank > dà questo errore > > spero che prima o poi si riesca di risolvere con questi edit automatici di iD, che spesso sono discutibili e contro il

Re: [Talk-es] Edit war about names in Basque speaking regions

Hola, El criterio usado en algunos de los changeset por Hart Beltza parece correcto si en el municipio aparecen placas con los nombres en ambos idiomas. Es decir, en name deben aparecer los dos nombres separados por una barra. Luego, habría que añadir las traducciones en name:eu y name:es.

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

The PTv2 schema says to put all the route ways first in order, then the bus stops in order. Maybe you can do a similar thing here and sort the route ways first and then the sign points. Get Outlook for Android From: Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

sent from a phone > On 25. Jul 2020, at 20:33, Alberto Nogaro via talk > wrote: > > So if you do so, information is indeed lost. > +1 > Otherwise I can’t see why should it difficult to data consumer to strip the > unwanted information before processing the route. > +1 > > >

[Talk-se] Naturreservat i OSM

Hej, Har dock en fundering/önskemål. Det finns ju även natura 2000 och riksintressen m.m.. Dessa hittar jag inte i OSM. Finns planer på att lägga in dessa (om de inte finns). En del områden är väldigt stora och överlappar varandra och då kanske olika färger skulle hjälpa till?

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

You could run a script to remove the signposts from the route relations. But, other than digging in the database history, there’s no script which could add them back (proximity of a sign to a route is not a valid criterion). So if you do so, information is indeed lost. Otherwise I can’t see why

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

On 25.07.20 18:14, pangoSE wrote: > Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route relations. > I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a script. > I se no loss of information It loses the information whether or not a route is signed at a particular signpost. Because,

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

Where was the discussion. Do you have a link? I think the relation of the 'route' should be purely the ways & if there's an actual requirement*, the signs should be included as a part of a super relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-Relation * Is there a requirement? Doesn't the

[OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

Hi Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route relations. I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a script. I se no loss of information doing that and a benefit to data consumers wanting to sort and calculate the length and height profile of the relation which I

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Scinder un immeuble

Bonjour, Il est d'usage de mettre le lien l'objet en question sur la liste afin de se faire une idée. Car si l'immeuble a trois entrées mais qu'hormis ça, c'est un parallélépipède rectangle, à quoi bon scinder ? Les adresses sont représentées par des points, peu importe la représentation du

[OSM-talk-fr] Scinder un immeuble

Bonjour, Afin de rendre OSM correct vis à vis de la réalité, je souhaiterais connaître s'il est envisageable de scinder un immeuble en différents bâtiments. J'ai le cas d'un, où le tout est scindé en trois tours malgré une apparence compacte avec des numéros différents.Merci d'avance.

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

Grazie Manuel. Ho fatto confusione io. Volker On Sat, 25 Jul 2020, 17:09 Manuel, wrote: > Ho trovato il task sul sito di JOSM (18951 > ), ma si parla di > water=riverbank, non di waterway. > > Manuel > > Ottieni BlueMail per Android

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

Ho trovato il task sul sito di JOSM (18951), ma si parla di water=riverbank, non di waterway. ⁣Manuel Ottieni BlueMail per Android ​ Il giorno 25 lug 2020, 16:42, alle ore 16:42, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: >Adesso lo fa anche JOSM. Era quello la causa della mia domanda. > >On Sat, 25 Jul

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

Adesso lo fa anche JOSM. Era quello la causa della mia domanda. On Sat, 25 Jul 2020, 12:56 Manuel, wrote: > Credo anche io si riferisca a iD, che in presenza di un waterway=riverbank > dà questo errore > Manuel > Il 25/07/2020 10:10, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > > sent from a phone > >

[OSM-talk-fr] balisages club vosgien et GR

Bonjour, J'ai remarqué que le balisage club vosgien (ainsi que le balisage GR) étaient maintenant disponibles sur OSM, avec le symbole des itinéraires (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol). Voir par exemple ici:

[Talk-at] landuse: line oder multipolygon?

Hallo! Eine Frage zu Stil und Praktikabilität: Wenn ein detailliert gemaptes Gebiet ohne Lücken mit landuse oder gleichwertig getagt ist, dann stoßen ja immer exakt Flächen aneinander, entweder als geschlossene Linien oder als Multipolygone. Es kommt aber immer wieder einmal vor, dass

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

Looking at it from a TRA (Threat Risk Assessment) point of view OpenStreetMap is not totally dependent on one central database being up and working. The primary database is fed by edits but if the database happens to get encrypted by Malware the backup and copies are still there.  The tiles

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

This doesn't look like CAPTCHA. It's just a text box with the word "Confirmation Code". It still happens with all ad blockers off. There are no requests to Google hosts, or any other non-OSM hosts. -- Skyler On July 25, 2020 08:13:10 Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: I would expect CAPTCHA.

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

I would expect CAPTCHA. Can you try with adblock disabled (including pihole, in-browser adblock, hosts file blocking etc)? (yes, we are using recaptcha - if someone is capable of working on switching it to something better - see https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/issues/383 and

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

And database size limit is just a start :) It is artificially limited to 1G of RAM. I am curious how long planet import with 1GB of RAM would run :) Jul 25, 2020, 13:31 by jwhelan0...@gmail.com: > And as we start to fill the database with buildings even those might not fit. > > Thanks John > >

Re: [Talk-se] Diverse frågor kring öar

Hej! Ett delsvar på fråga 2: place=locality som används för Jättholmarna nu är på sätt och vis en generell "i brist på bättre"-tagg. Den renderas i standardrenderingen på osm.org men bara med liten text från zoomnivå 16 och uppåt. En multipolygon för de ingående öarna med taggen place=archipelago

Re: [talk-au] NSW LPI Data

Hmm... We might have a problem then, because we've been using the following endpoint to generate our address points: https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/rest/services/sixmaps/PropertyAddress/MapServer/3/query I was hoping to move to using the following instead, as it provides better locations for

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

And as we start to fill the database with buildings even those might not fit. Thanks John On Sat, Jul 25, 2020, 05:19 Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > On 24.07.20 23:55, john whelan wrote: > > Microsoft SQL Server Express is a free limited version of SQL server > > that may well do for many users.

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

Credo anche io si riferisca a iD, che in presenza di un waterway=riverbank dà questo errore Manuel Il 25/07/2020 10:10, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: sent from a phone On 23. Jul 2020, at 15:17, Volker Schmidt wrote: Qualcuno che aveva seguito di più questa storia, potrebbe indicarmi

Re: [talk-au] Working with local government

I think in the US the tiger import used such tags with the aim to remove them once the item has been checked. A massive and still ongoing effort from what I heard. On 20 July 2020 10:17:25 pm AEST, Andrew Harvey wrote: >On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 12:33, David Wales >wrote: > >> Is there any

Re: [talk-au] Show your support of OpenStreetMap in our region: OSMF Application 

Hello all, late to the game. Did the meeting take place? Is there some outcome or summary of it? Cheers, Sebastian On 19 July 2020 5:17:40 pm AEST, Edoardo Neerhut wrote: >Hi again, > >Andrew informs me that the calendar invite link doesn't work. I'll send >out >invites to everyone who puts

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

On 24.07.20 23:55, john whelan wrote: Microsoft SQL Server Express is a free limited version of SQL server that may well do for many users. reading express edition limitations I see: * Maximum relational database size: 10GB That would only be enough for the smallest of OSM regional extracts

Re: [Talk-it] [talk-it] waterway=riverbank deprecated

sent from a phone > On 23. Jul 2020, at 15:17, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Qualcuno che aveva seguito di più questa storia, potrebbe indicarmi con che > procedura e quando waterway=riverbank è stato "depreceated". non mi risulta deprecated:

Re: [talk-au] NSW LPI Data

It should still apply, but as always only the services listed at https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/products_and_services/web_services/access_web_services are covered, the Property Address endpoint is not directly listed and therefore cannot be assumed to be openly licensed. On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at

[talk-au] NSW LPI Data

Dear all, As part of the NSW Address Import , we have been relying (I think) upon the following explicit permission: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/New_South_Wales_Government_Data However, the links

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Découpage administratif à Paris, les conseils de quartier

Hmmm... les conseils de quartiers existent en théorie, cependant ce sont des structures autonomes (associatives), dont le rôle est consultatif. Et souvent les communes conservent leur propres définitions des secteurs. Ceci peut aussi se découper différememnt avec la participation citoyenne locale

Re: [talk-au] How do you tag a registered club?

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 18:04, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 16/7/20 9:49 am, Bren Barnes wrote: > > Morning, apparently it's amenity=licensed_club according to tagging > > guidelines. > > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Licensed_Club > > > > Thanks for that.