On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:14 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you submit copyrighted data if you agreed to the new
Contributor Terms, even if it's under a free license?
Obviously only if it's a free license which is compatible with DbCL. That
probably includes CC0 and not
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.comwrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
Interesting. I just noticed the
your data, and such vandalism will usually rightfully lead to the
community reverting it.
What if a new contributor reverts it? Would the revert then be considered
ODBL?
Terribly thought out process. Terrible idea in the first place.
Anthony
___
Talk
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.ukwrote:
I think that would be mapped as a separate parallel way, with the one way's
causing it to prevent it using the exit that you can't use, thus producing
correct routing.
Shaun
Well, it wasn't.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.comwrote:
The bigger issue with it being
imported into OSM is the currency, because municipal boundaries are
always changing, and as has been mentioned, boundaries are not usually
something that is easily verifiable on the
Hi Maning,
No, not at all passable.
Anthony
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 21:19 +0800, maning sambale wrote:
anthony,
Thanks for verifying. In short, you can't pass by the road for now?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Anthony G. Balico
anthony.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eugene,
Went out
of getting
crushed like a tiny ant. We'll see if commonwealth ext is possible :)
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 07:27 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
So should we draw it and mark it as highway=construction?
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Anthony G. Balico
anthony.bal...@gmail.com wrote
every rush hour in there. I will not miss that, i live
in the area *wink*
Bytheway, im uploading some traces taken at Negros, from Bacolod down
south to Dumaguete. Tracing these at the same time.
Anthony
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 04:42 -0700, ianlopez wrote:
I'm planning to remove some tainted
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:04 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 6 April 2010 18:00, Igor Brejc igor.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know about NSW and Vic case, but in the above cases the official
Well we're talking about this specific case and the border is based on
the
and those on the wiki. This way the many individuals who wish to avoid
Google can participate too.
Anthony
On Apr 5, 2010 6:22 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 April 2010 05:37, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
which they don't fully realise. ...
I found it weird
arguments on
google-earth derived data?
Anthony
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 11:20 +0800, maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
I am collecting my own thoughts on how we can resolve possible
copyright issues within osm-ph. There are several notes in the wiki
dealing with this cases including an OSM
I never thought of that, but it makes sense :)
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 11:51 +0800, maning sambale wrote:
My suspicious self tells me this is an April's Fools Day joke. :)
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Anthony G. Balico
anthony.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps some of you have
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Do you add the 'postcode' as a tag to
each house, or just create a relation for a post code?
Neither. I let people look up postcodes using lookup tables, not maps.
___
talk
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Post code areas are tremendously useful in Germany because they are
commonly used as a cheap machine readable form of location descriptor
(enter your post code to find the nearest band branch etc).
That's a good use for
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
There is a post code database that is officially maintained but it is not
free.
That's...interesting. Wouldn't any accurate description of the post codes
necessarily be a derivative of that official database?
If you're
Perhaps you've got time to look into this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.94963lon=120.08165zoom=15layers=B000FTFT
too.
Came across while tracing few uploaded gps tracks.
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:20 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
On second though, the GPX track is too artificial. I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Seventy 7 seven...@operamail.com wrote:
Tirkon wrote:
I found some discussions within OSM, that it would make sense to
offer
an OSM editor especially for beginners. To make it easy enough, they
should not confuse the beginner with complicated stuff
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
We NEED as a mater of
urgency an agreed method of MANAGING groups of ways that at a low zoom
level
define a single linear object, but at higher zoom levels show that the
'boundaries', carriage ways and structure are
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
How to add USGS high res imagery as a layer for tracing.
you could file a josm-ticket to have them in the basic configuration
(already as preset like yahoo). (add the wms
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jeff Spirko spi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all,
Many of the administrative boundaries in my area follow roads (or vice
versa). (E.g. http://osm.org/go/Zcll6ubE?layers=B000TTF ) It seems
like the TIGER import has a separate list of nodes for the two ways
(one
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
How about 4: delete the TIGER imported administrative boundaries?
In my experience a) they're not very good, and b) we should be using
boundary relations anyway.
How will boundary relations help? They must still refer to a
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
How will boundary relations help what?
If you were asking how they help in general, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
In particular, they Make it easier to stitch all the parts of a border to
each other
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
In your point b), do you mean that if we did use boundary relations that
there would not be an issue with boundaries and roads being co-mingled and
mis-edited?
The use of boundary relations doesn't prevent people from
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:40 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 March 2010 13:31, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
1) How so? In the worst case scenario you have an equal-sized mess. Can
you give an example?
Because you are trying to hit a moving target...
What does
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:59 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 March 2010 13:53, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
True. What's your point?
That you haven't actually done much work on boundaries to figure this
all out for yourself and the pitfalls of some of the suggestions
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:28 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 March 2010 14:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
YOU said that I meant re-use the road as part of a relation. But in
fact
I did not. My position on that is that sometimes that is a good idea
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:42 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 March 2010 14:32, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
By reading the legal definition, of course. Same way I'd determine what
the
border is in the first place.
How many borders in the US are there exactly?
3
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:45 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
What are the thing or things you know know that you wish you'd known when
you started with OpenStreetMap?
How to add USGS high res imagery as a layer for tracing.
___
talk mailing
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0500, Anthony wrote:
How so? I said motorway and/or trunk roads. Any roads which don't
qualify as motorways would be trunks.
But expressways are trunks.
All of them? If you say so
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0500, Anthony wrote:
How so? I said motorway and/or trunk roads. Any roads which don't
qualify as motorways would
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:21:17 -0500, Anthony wrote:
Yeah. Motorway is simple. A road designated exclusively for motor
vehicles.
That's not true for most of America (as only 23 states prohibit bicycles
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by work differently. The laws of different
states are different, so the information which needs to be presented by
the
map is different. The maps, therefore, are going
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
The important, worldwide criteria that I'd expect is this:
*Motorways are exclusive to motor vehicle traffic.
*trunks are the most important roads in a geographic area which aren't
motorways.
As a corollary to this, Alaska should
C5-Mindanao intersection updated to correct the routing issue. Thanks
to Ian's suggestions.
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 18:05 -0800, ianlopez wrote:
The tunnel should be tagged as highway=construction;
construction=primary.
Regarding Granada, it is either a two-way road or a one way road
heading
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Yeah. Motorway is simple. A road designated exclusively for motor
vehicles. The rest should probably be handled on a state by state basis.
Europe doesn't have a single tagging scheme for all of its
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I think it would be better if greater weight were given to what
network a particular road belongs to.
Freeway expressway = motorway or trunk,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:08 PM, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
Google tech is really nice
Yeah. Anyone know how they're doing this? It's stuff like this that makes
me think that a free, non-profit project is always going to be many steps
behind the big boys when it comes to this domain.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:51 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2 March 2010 03:28, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Yeah. Anyone know how they're doing this? It's stuff like this that
makes
me think that a free, non-profit project is always going to be many steps
behind
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2 March 2010 04:36, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Wikipedia is a whole different beast. It'll likely be replaced by Google
when and if Google come out with a breakthrough in natural language
processing
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2010 17:19, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I completely disagree. We're running a project to map the world,
We agree on that - but I claim that to do so effectively we have to
harness the power of
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2010 17:28, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Are you sure about that? How many people does it take to map the world?
1,000? 10,000? 100,000? 1,000,000? More than that?
The more the merrier
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:33 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 February 2010 17:30, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Perhaps they did, but they would be wrong.
Because of hindsight?
No, because ways aren't powerful enough to build complex data structures.
Relations
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com
wrote:
I live in a place where I feel the need to map some streets as areas. If
I start a little of such mapping, will routing software get
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
...Way representation is more useful for
...
- anything that has directional information, such as oneway roads
Exactly. Mapping a way as an
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 23:26:52, John Smith wrote:
On 23 February 2010 08:05, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
I remember someone complaining with me that routers not supporting
highway=* + area=yes in the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Exactly. Mapping a way as an area is fine as long as you also
represent *the path of travel*.
What path of travel? There are many paths of travel
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:30 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 February 2010 16:22, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I only found one (the one about directional information, in the case of a
one-way road) to be correct. The other 5 were complaints about how the
current
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:49 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 February 2010 16:43, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
We've got all the tools we need - nodes and relations. With them we can
build anything else we want.
I'm sure people said the same thing about ways
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.comwrote:
I live in a place where I feel the need to map some streets as areas. If
I start a little of such mapping, will routing software get confused?
If it's not a one-way road, routing software should be pretty much fine,
You agree to only add Contents for which You are the copyright holder (to
the extent the Contents include any copyrightable elements).
If You are not the copyright holder of the Contents, You represent and
warrant that You have explicit permission
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.ukwrote:
Why not offset the nodes a little to make them easier to work with and be
able to see that there is two ways there?
Because that would be tagging for the srenderer/s editor.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:57 PM, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Hi,
Stefan Pflumm wrote:
this ways are all highways.
It surely is unusual for two highways sharing the same nodes, and I
cannot think of an example where this would make sense. But that doesn't
mean there is none; can you
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
tag k=fcc:unique_system_identifier v=2645662/
tag k=website
v=
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrRegistration.jsp?regKey=2645662
/
I'd say this is redundant, and would lose the url (doesn't seem very
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
tag k=ele v=278.9/
By the way, what is the datum for the elevation figure?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Hi Maning,
Is there any chance i can loan one?
Already updated the OSM Ph wiki and reflected my request
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/GPStogo_program#Reservation_requests
Thanks.
Anthony
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/2/3 Chango640 chango...@gmail.com:
If you are interested in this proposal, please visit
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gated_community to
see
full details and discuss.
Why not use
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, dion_d...@comcast.net wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase my question: is there any harm in adding a layer=1
tag to something that is already tagged bridge=yes?
In some cases, yes. No layer tag implies layer=0. For example (and it's
only a single example which
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer My take is that the
open to the air surface is layer 0 Ground or water.
That seems to be the intention, but it doesn't always work in the real
world, mainly because the
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel a script applying layer=1 to any bridge without a layer tag should
be ok IF it also checks for bridges that cross it and increment those layer
numbers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com wrote:
What we can't tell without checking satellite view is whether the bridge is
at grade level with the Railroad in a ditch, or if the bridge pitches up
over the RR.
Or both. Or maybe halfway between the two (think
Hi Maning,
Just wondrin what are we going to use as source- name.
From:
maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To:
osm-ph talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Date:
01/21/2010 11:15 AM
Subject:
[talk-ph] new imagery available in Bulacan, Pampanga and Nueva Ecija
area(SPOT5)
This came
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I think Google and others will quickly rape the PD server
This assumes that they can find a means to import and check the data.
This is Google - it's
That's not how the ODBL works. When the switch is made to the ODBL, every
individual changeset/node/way/etc will be effectively in the PD (everyone in
the world will have a non-revocable license to do anything restricted by
copyright law). Only the database as a whole will be under ODBL.
On
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
That's not how the ODBL works. When the switch is made to the ODBL,
every
individual changeset/node/way/etc will be effectively in the PD (everyone
in
the world will have a non
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant.
All contributions are effectively PD anyway.
Or, will be when/if the new contributor terms are adopted.
___
talk mailing list
talk
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant.
All contributions are effectively PD anyway.
That still isn't the point, people want to produce PD data that is
readily
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Why would it be difficult? If a node was created under license X and
has only been edited by other users allowing license X then it's under
license X.
Unless, some share-alike
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:34 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
So one person needs to anonymously download everything from OSM and put
it
up on another website which doesn't have the ODbL on it.
What you are suggesting is shady at best
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:42 AM, DavidD thewi...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2010/1/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant.
All contributions are effectively PD anyway.
That still isn't the point, people
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.orgwrote:
Anthony wrote:
How exactly does one get protection as a database owner? It's unclear to
me how OSMF would get protection as a database owner since
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
whereas if the data is not copyrighted, but given to me under a contract
that stipulates that I may not put it up on a web site and say download and
use freely then
* I am in breach of contract
* anyone who downloads
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
But I think you're missing the fact that sites which try to restrict
people from copying their databases pretty much universally do not provide
database dumps.
I don't think that matters at all
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm already a little dubious about the value of recording the
locations of professional services like lawyers. Why not just have a
separate project for directories of all kinds, make sure our
addressing works, and use
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Now either we provide that information, by making a rule and hoping
everyone understands and adheres to it (unlikely), or else we just try and
keep our nodes close enough to each other because that will then reduce the
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you want to edit a small area in the middle, your editor won't
download the huge outer areas required to find that such a line
exists.
This was done by design, because it makes processing an API request
much easier,
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote:
Hi all,
And, thinking about it a bit, I guess the proper rule is that (10,
10) - (30, 30) passes through (20, 20), since it's completely
unrealistic to assume that the basic renderers will do otherwise.
And this is
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote:
THAT depends on your definition of straight line.
I suppose, but it'd have to be a pretty contrived definition of
straight line to be equivalent to Spherical Mercator, would it not?
I think that line that are straight
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/8 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
I think don't map for the renderer is a nice idea, but has nothing to
do with
Don't map incorrectly for the renderer to have it show up a certain
way...
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:32 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/9 Martin Siegel martin.sie...@sdas.de:
AFAIK this is not correct. First of all the PoV of Mercator projection
is not going through the center of the earth. It's a somehow stretched
cylindrical projection and
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Straight lines on the earth are not necessary straight lines in some
projections. They
should show up as curves. But if you don't have enought supporting nodes,
you
don't get nice curves.
I just drew a great circle route
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
I was claiming it's possible to launch a
friverlous lawsuit with no basis and keep it going on for years and
effectively bankrupt the competition in the process.
OSMF is located in the UK, right? Doesn't the UK have
will help spur them into action.
Anthony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
And I fail to see how carrying out a pilgrimage to the street in
question changes anything.
It certainly builds confidence that the names you're entering
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
I would like to ask if OSM or anyone can host this images to be used on
OSM.
The images are here:
ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/mapas/ortofoto/
Hmm, what format do you want it to be hosted in?
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
What OSMF _may_ get is a database right in all the bits of
contribution that they get from contributors. I say _may_ because
database right is not a straightforward. Its quite possible they won't
have such a right, but
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be acceptable?
The current situation is acceptable. We all grant
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
What would
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:02 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/5 Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com:
2010/1/4 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Hence not copyright assignment, but basically the same thing. You
give up
the right to sue, and the OSMF gets the right to sue
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest that if and when there is a more open OCM, then you might
argue to replace Andy's one with it. I don't see a point in shooting
ourselves in the foot before then.
Do you see the point in building OSM in the
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
The answer is, We don't copy other maps at OpenStreetMap because we
respect copyright law and related rights, even if we disagree with
some aspects of them. []
There's a difference between doing something which is
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
You have to be able to copy facts from time to time.
And that means you have to use your own judgment as to what constitutes a
copyright infringement
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I find it incredibly strange that you're more comfortable relying on the
consensus than your own judgment, but hey, whatever works for you.
To put
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
What if my system is, map all the roads in a 200m radius, then look up
the names, then repeat?
I'd say that certainly qualifies as systematic. As to your other scenarios,
I'm not sure you gave enough information.
By
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, while I've got the soapbox out, (and while I'm not feeling as
ill as I was over the last few days), let me do a bit more explaining
about OpenCycleMap and its openness. I make the styles for
OpenCycleMap. Just me.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, while I've got the soapbox out, (and while I'm not feeling as
ill as I was over the last few days), let me do a bit more explaining
about
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
It is however a very good example of where people have taken the trouble to
ACTUALLY map reality and their efforts have been destroyed!
I agree with your point, but that's a bit of hyperbole there. The data is
still
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
explain what would be the advantages from my side?
I think you probably have release more than enough open stuff to know
about the motivations of doing so ;-) But I agree that once people start
to *demand* you release
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:02 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/4 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
The Australian outback is vast, but there is hardly anything mappable by
survey out there. When it comes to urban and suburban mapping (where most
streetnames and cycleways
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/1/4 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Do they have Internet access there? If so, then they can map it
themselves. If not, then there's not much point in us mapping it for
them
anyway.
I didn't think we were mapping
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Does Nearmap own the copyright on the images?
Aha, it seems they do.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
801 - 900 di 1311 matches
Mail list logo
