At the risk of reopening earlier very lengthy discussions - this suggestion
seems to me to be an unnecessary misuse of the tag highway=cycleway which
has an accepted and fairly well agreed meaning. It also seems to be a prima
facie case of tagging for the renderers! Surely it is the rendering that
2009/4/30 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
At the risk of reopening earlier very lengthy discussions - this suggestion
seems to me to be an unnecessary misuse of the tag highway=cycleway which
has an accepted and fairly well agreed meaning. It also seems to be a prima
facie case of tagging
On Wednesday 29 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
I'm looking for a way to map restrictions for a zone. This
includes things like maxspeed, maxweight and parking restriction.
I want to avoid having to place those tags on all the roads inside
the zone, specially for
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
For example in our local park bikes can go on all the paths, but there
are some specific divided cycle paths too. (We
Risk?!
Misuse how?
Dave
My idea:
highway=cycleway OR (highway=footway,bicycle=permissive) don't care which
(so will be picked up by bike-orientated maps)
*and*
foot=designated
designation=public_footpath
so that foot orientated renderers like Freemap will pick it up as a public
right of
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:36:43AM +0100, James Stewart wrote:
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
Sure.
For example in our local park bikes can go on
Jacek Konieczny schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:36:43AM +0100, James Stewart wrote:
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
Sure.
For
According to http://maps.cloudmade.com/ it is not possible to drive by car
from Stensättaregatan (58.41685269735186 15.595479011535645) to
Skräddaregatan (58.41647059846362 15.597131252288818). Is there some
problem in the tagging of the streets or is it because the routing is a
little too good at
The new text is available at
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ and includes diff
versions so that you can see clearly what changes are made.
A summary of changes and the Open Data Commons comment process lasting
up until May 6th is described here:
Moved to Talk.
Jochen Topf wrote
Sent: 30 April 2009 8:41 AM
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
The discussion on using Cloudmade routing on the OSM website points to a
deeper question: What is the OpenStreetMap project and how do we want
to present it on
Etienne Chové a écrit :
Dears,
I wrote a python class to communicate with OSM API (read, write,
update). For interested users, informations are here [1].
May I put sources on the dev server ?
Here it is :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/src/modules/OsmApi.py
--
Etienne
It comes down to what you think is meant by highway=cycleway. If you think
that it means a cycle superhighway, then obviously you don't want to apply
that to a shared-with-pedestrians route. But cycle superhighways are pretty
rare, and highway=cycleway is used much more widely than that. I've come
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Greg Troxel
and you define the relation to
say that all ways in some area of some type should be in the relation.
You try to use relations to define a category but :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
Pieren
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Mario Salvini wrote:
If such paths are designated for foot ans bicyle as well, why don't you
tag them both as designated?
highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated ( or footway
+bicycle=designated or cycleway+foot=desiganted)
I do that, when
I feel like there's something slightly missing. Perhaps needs a mention of
ever-more-accurate data, with the implication that it remains permanently
and very-intentionally open to improvement by new people who see details
that have been missed.
I don't see OSM as providing data, more providing a
Richard Mann wrote:
... I've come to the view that cycleway should be used
if someone's gone to the trouble to make it good enough to cycle on, and
nobody's obviously objecting.
I'd agree with that. As a non-cyclist I don't feel somehow
discriminated against because somewhere that I walk
Hi Jochen Andy,
There is however a danger in leaving interpretation of the data solely to
closed source projects (e.g. Cloudmade) : Because there is no agreement in
the community on the exact meaning of many of our tags, it is possible that
people may tag for the closed source project. Even
I'll focus on the coexistence vs. zone-only aspect, because most of the
other problems can indeed be solved or mitigated by choosing a decent
zone representation and throwing in some editor support and documentation.
Ben Laenen wrote:
- zonal mapping makes it more difficult to write software
Man! This should be a featured image:
http://toposm.com/ma/?zoom=15lat=42.26621lon=-71.02104layers=B000
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog:
On Thursday 30 April 2009, you wrote:
So you assume that well-designed, liberally licensed (!= GPL) Open
Source libraries will exist for all major programming languages and
platforms soon? Well, until then, I'll continue to assume that the
goal of OSM data being used in creative and unexpected
Hi everyone
in my opinion OSM should not try to compete with mapping websites by
offering more and more tools for using maps. This is because I think
such an endeavour would have three problems: First, how to decide
which of the hundreds of tools out there are integrated on the OSM
website and
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map layer,
especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used (for raw paths as
you describe them). The dark grey dashed lines in Mapnik seem a good
starting point.
If path was rendered then the problem kinda goes away - use
Christoph Böhme wrote:
Hi everyone
in my opinion OSM should not try to compete with mapping websites by
offering more and more tools for using maps. This is because I think
such an endeavour would have three problems: First, how to decide
which of the hundreds of tools out there are
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map layer,
especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used
Every time it gets discussed, it becomes *less* clear how it's being
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different website
altogether.
I disagree. OSM doesn't need a faked-up website to show what can be
done. There's plenty of real places using the data for real
full ack
some tags are too confusing ...
on a lighter note: from tagwatch
typo or protest against a very_horrible tag ;-)
smoothmess horrible (4), impassable (1)
On 30 Apr 2009, at 8:59 , Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map
layer, especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used
Every time it gets
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Paul Johnson a scris:
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Renaud MICHEL schrieb:
I didn't find an answer in the wiki, how should I tag roads that
are one way for motorized vehicles but two way for bicycle?
The documented and established way to
2009/4/30, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
Every time it gets discussed, it becomes *less* clear how it's being
used to me. And I'm mightily concerned that the 10 people discussing
it on these lists might be in no way representative of the 14,990
people who are mapping paths and aren't
Hi,
Alan Wright wrote:
I'm not only thinking of the standard slippy-map, but contour layers,
routing, poi's, etc, etc.
Contrary to what some people make you believe, OSM does not have contour
layers or elevation data. There's much talk about a possible sister
project (open elevation map?
Ouch, that's bad.
i thought they'd contain some actual data, size implied that.
I wonder if anybody knows a way to render the 16 German federal states
(Bundesländer)? Actually that's what i want to do in the end..
Is there a way to find out what is in a Shapefile? Like that i can write
Hi,
Torsten Mohr wrote:
Is there a way to find out what is in a Shapefile?
Use a GIS program like QGIS to open and display the shapefile and you
can see what's there!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
Fully agree - and this seems to be in the spirit of most current practice
...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: James Stewart [mailto:j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk]
Sent: 30 April 2009 11:37
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of footways with bicycle=yes
There are
Mario - perhaps inadvertently, but importantly - raises a separate issue for
those of us who like the tag designation= . This tag is afaik a more recent
introduction than designated= . Although the intention was much the same in
each case the wiki descriptions are subtly different. My personal
... Part way with James but recognising Jacek's point it would need adding
bicycle=permissive or bicycle=yes as appropriate so that the cycle renderers
pick up. Where appropriate (e.g. often in the UK) the use of
designation=public_footpath (meaning that the default is bicycle=no unless
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 April 2009 17:00
To: Richard Mann
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of footways with bicycle=yes
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
I could more or less go with this too - but perhaps only if we could adopt
more widely the use of designation= (or designated= - see earlier post!) to
allow the definition of legal status (mostly in the UK admittedly) for those
of us who are public rights of way workers. Is there a case for adding
... Hmm! Interesting alternative approach ... Not sure what I think ...
Worth discussing ... By now everyone who cares knows that I like the
designation= tag as it solves a lot of problems for me but that is equally
compatible with Ben's approach as with any other.
Mike Harris
-Original
I'm one of the people mapping paths (since March) who scans this list,
and I have to say that I'm confused. Although part of that may be
because I'm new to OSM and not just to the matter of how to deal with
tagging and rendering things. And part of that may because a lot of the
tagging conventions
Hi all,
Andy has sorted out a venue for the Sunderland Mapping Party this weekend.
It's a couple of miles North on the seafront of Seaburn.
Saturday 2nd Sunday 4th May
Approx. 10am to 5pm each day
Marriott Hotel, Queens Parade, Sunderland, SR6 8DB Phone: 44 191 5292041.
Map
Hello, Torsten. I think the 16 german federal states (lander) are available as
a shapefile in lots of different places. Here is one example:
http://wetnet.net/~we7u/xastir/maps/shapefile/Germany/
That is a shapefile (compressed) with 16 polygons, and you also have the
population and
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different website
altogether.
I disagree. OSM doesn't need a faked-up website to show what can be
done. There's plenty of real places using the data for
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_image_proposals#TopOSM
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:27 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Man! This should be a featured image:
http://toposm.com/ma/?zoom=15lat=42.26621lon=-71.02104layers=B000
Alan Wright wrote:
Sent: 30 April 2009 9:43 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different
website
Just a small correction to Gregory's note, Sunday is of course May 3rd.
Hope to see some of you on Sat or Sun.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Gregory
Sent: 30 April 2009 7:56 PM
To: Talk
Richard Mann wrote:
Why not tag it as a cycleway? Then it will display as a cycleway. How is
it different from anything else that might be tagged as a cycleway?
At least when I'm trying to decide, I ask two questions: 1) Does it
allow bicycles, and 2) Is it wide enough for two cyclists going
Richard Mann wrote:
It comes down to what you think is meant by highway=cycleway. If you
think that it means a cycle superhighway, then obviously you don't want
to apply that to a shared-with-pedestrians route.
Depends on jurisdiction, of course. One problem OSM has with handling
Oregon and
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Mario Salvini wrote:
If such paths are designated for foot ans bicyle as well, why don't you
tag them both as designated?
highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated ( or footway
+bicycle=designated or
Proposal page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/surface_unification
Proposal discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/surface_unification
Please read the talk-page before commenting on this!
Introduction:
This proposal should improve the current
MapOf [1], which is called from the export tab on the main map page,
currently only produces an error instead of nice, big Osmarender maps.
Stefan
[1] http://tah.openstreetmap.org/MapOf/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Colin Marquardt wrote:
2009/4/30 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
In my opionion we should produce a page with featured applications,
with a link from the mainpage (before Help Wiki i would propose).
Last year
Hello,
I would like to map areas (like the Kabini lake) from the Yahoo! Aerial
Imagery, but without sketching them manually (as I can do in Potlatch). I
was thinking using Gimp on the satellite view to extract an outline and to
import it as a way, somehow in Potlatch or JOSM. Then rescaling and
On Thursday 30 April 2009 14:11:48 Guillaume Audirac wrote:
I would like to map areas (like the Kabini lake) from the Yahoo! Aerial
Imagery, but without sketching them manually (as I can do in Potlatch). I
was thinking using Gimp on the satellite view to extract an outline and to
import it as
2009/4/30 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
volevo chiedere come vanno le cose. Mi ha scritto Nop (della Mappa dei
Io stavo preparando la macchina virtuale ma sono fermo da una
settimana. Non è ancora usabile (manca mapnik e altro)
performance. Lui chiede se possiamo ospitarla. Offre
2009/4/28 Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com
Ciao,
Ciao
Sabato mi è arrivata lettera da parte della Giunta della Regione
Lombardia - Servizio SIT, in cui, a seguito di una mia richiesta di
dicembre 2008, viene autorizzato all'intero gruppo OpenStreetMap
l'inserimento di tutti i dati
2009/4/30 Vezzo vezz...@gmail.com:
Fantastica notizia, quindi adesso si possono utilizzare ma quali? ne ho
visti un po'. soprattutto si possono avere anche gli indirizzi da usare in
josm di quello che si può usare??
Per il momento non userei il WMS in JOSM a causa dello shift che non
siamo
Federico Cozzi dixit:
2009/4/30 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
volevo chiedere come vanno le cose. Mi ha scritto Nop (della Mappa dei
Io stavo preparando la macchina virtuale ma sono fermo da una
settimana. Non è ancora usabile (manca mapnik e altro)
potrebbe essere
2009/4/30 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
La mia domanda è: qual è la stringa esatta da usare per il copyright?
non l'ho ancora pubblicata, sono in questo momento quanto di piu'
lontano si possa essere da uno scanner... :)
--
-S
___
Talk-it
2009/4/30 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Per il momento non userei il WMS in JOSM a causa dello shift che non
siamo riusciti a rimuovere.
La cosa migliore (attualmente) sarebbe fare il download dei dati in
formato SHP, quindi convertirli con shp2osm e fare l'upload (massivo o
manuale a
La cosa migliore (attualmente) sarebbe fare il download dei dati in
formato SHP, quindi convertirli con shp2osm e fare l'upload (massivo o
manuale a scelta)
Personalmente sono contrario all'upload massimo.
Inserire manualmente piccole zone per volta consente un lavoro più
accurato, anche se
Il 30 aprile 2009 10.35, Roberto Moretti ilr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
La cosa migliore (attualmente) sarebbe fare il download dei dati in
formato SHP, quindi convertirli con shp2osm e fare l'upload (massivo o
manuale a scelta)
Personalmente sono contrario all'upload massimo.
Inserire
2009/4/30 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com
Personalmente sono contrario all'upload massimo.
Inserire manualmente piccole zone per volta consente un lavoro più
accurato, anche se più lungo.
Sono penamente d'accordo dato che ho già trovato alcune cose sbagliate nel
mio comune, infatti
ciao mappatori Lucani e Puglisi, e perche' no... di tutto il resto
d'italia :)
ancora in dubbio se passare un fantastico sabato a Matera patrimonio
dell'Unesco? se non la conoscete, rimarrete senza fiato!
portatevi i vostri GPS e portati... anceh se c'e' chi portare' qualche
GPS in piu' nel
Il giorno Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:43:16 +0200
Luigi Pirelli l.pire...@acsys.it ha scritto:
Pomeriggio: MAPPINGPARTY a cura della comunità OpenStreetMap
Mappatura con GPS del centro città... è solo l'inizio
Pomeriggio: Mappo ergo Scarico a cura di OpenStreetMap
Luca,
qualche novità su dove si svolgeranno i vari eventi?
c'e' un link in cui guardare ed al quale puntare dalla nostra wiki?
Edo
--
Edoardo 'Yossef' Marascalchi
ICT Consultant
Tel +39.347.008.00.02
website: http://www.edoardomarascalchi.it
skype: My status skype:asca_edom?call
Il 30 aprile 2009 13.00, Edoardo 'Yossef' Marascalchi
edoa...@edoardomarascalchi.it ha scritto:
Luca,
qualche novità su dove si svolgeranno i vari eventi?
non ancora, ieri sera c'era il consiglio di fiab e all'ordine del
giorno c'era appunto bicitalia
c'e' un link in cui guardare ed al quale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro De Noia ha scritto:
Il giorno Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:43:16 +0200
Luigi Pirelli l.pire...@acsys.it ha scritto:
Io e Alessandro siamo entrambi di Terlizzi, ma ormai ci sentiamo più su
internet che dal vivo :D
Pomeriggio: MAPPINGPARTY a
2009/4/30 Giovanni Fasano g...@gvf.ve.it:
Io stavo preparando la macchina virtuale ma sono fermo da una
settimana. Non è ancora usabile (manca mapnik e altro)
OK, in teoria è diventato meno urgente, perché lui è stato offerto
dello spazio da qualche altre parte, pero lui scrisse che cmq. è
Gianmario Mengozzi ha scritto:
Alberto,
hai avuto poi news dalla provincia?
Non ancora.
Ho mandato una email prima alla Provincia e poi direttamente al
responsabile del SIT ma ancora nulla.
Aspetto ancora un po' e poi pensavo di contattarlo al telefono se non
riceverò risposta.
Appena ho
Il 30 aprile 2009 13.47, Francesco de Virgilio fradev...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Penso che per iniziare sia più che sufficiente, non mi piacerebbe che
tante persone che sabato inizieranno a conoscere OSM, non appena
arrivate a casa, registrino due tracce e tentino di installare Mapnik in
Luigi Pirelli ha scritto:
ciao mappatori Lucani e Puglisi, e perche' no... di tutto il resto
d'italia :)
ancora in dubbio se passare un fantastico sabato a Matera patrimonio
dell'Unesco? se non la conoscete, rimarrete senza fiato!
portatevi i vostri GPS e portati... anceh se c'e' chi
2009/4/30 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com:
se mi date accesso ssh a una macchina debian like ve lo installo io e
vi metto a posto tutto
Ti prendo in parola - prima o poi ti contatto per un'assistenza remota ;-)
Ciao
___
Talk-it mailing list
Ciao, sulla pagina web della conferenza
osmit.fbk.eu
abbiamo pubblicato una bozza del programma.
L'elenco degli interventi non e' ancora definitivo in quanto aspettiamo
ancora alcune conferme.
Come potete leggere i contributi acquisiscono 4 forme:
- talk
- discussioni
- lavoro di gruppo
-
Il 30 aprile 2009 14.11, Cristina Moretto more...@fbk.eu ha scritto:
Sentitevi liberi di dire tutto quello che pensate.
non sapevo del costo dell'iscrizione, secondo me è una cavolata e
scoraggerà la gente comune a partecipare
--
Cristina Moretto
ciao
Luca
2009/4/30 Alessandro De Noia alessandro.den...@gmail.com:
Oggi è già giovedi e non ho proprio il tempo di vedermi l'installazione
di mapnik su Arch, a saperlo prima avrei guardato qualcosa.
A Kosmos avevo pensato anche io ma non avendo Windows avevo desistito.
non ti preoccupare, alla fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ave,
ma mica è indispensabile avere mapnik o simili?
Per una buona fase di apprendimento non è sufficiente usare un josm e
fermarsi lì?
Cmq ci si vede sabato! Dal Baslug verremo in 5 forse 6, quasi tutti con
GPS :D
Martin Koppenhoefer ha
Il giorno Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:10:35 +0200
ZeNo z...@baslug.org ha scritto:
Ave,
ma mica è indispensabile avere mapnik o simili?
Per una buona fase di apprendimento non è sufficiente usare un josm e
fermarsi lì?
Cmq ci si vede sabato! Dal Baslug verremo in 5 forse 6, quasi tutti
con
Luca Delucchi wrote:
Il 30 aprile 2009 14.11, Cristina Moretto more...@fbk.eu ha scritto:
Sentitevi liberi di dire tutto quello che pensate.
non sapevo del costo dell'iscrizione, secondo me è una cavolata e
scoraggerà la gente comune a partecipare
La questione e' che a Povo l'alternativa
Salve a tutti,
mi trovo in difficoltà per il mini software [1] che sto scrivendo per
OSMit.
Oltre alla mappa dinamica, per la quale ho già contattato Mario
Piccinelli, vorrei riuscire a produrre una mappa statica formata
dall'unione delle diverse tiles su cui posizionare un marker per ogni
evento.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alessandro De Noia ha scritto:
Come diceva Martin bastano anche carta e penna, mapnik (o altri
renderer) servono solo ad effettuare il rendering, in tempo reale, delle
tracce raccolte durante il mapping party.
Si, so a cosa servono :)
Infatti
Il 30 aprile 2009 15.41, Alessandro De Noia
alessandro.den...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Salve a tutti,
mi trovo in difficoltà per il mini software [1] che sto scrivendo per
OSMit.
Oltre alla mappa dinamica, per la quale ho già contattato Mario
Piccinelli, vorrei riuscire a produrre una mappa
Cristina Moretto ha scritto:
Luca Delucchi wrote:
Il 30 aprile 2009 14.11, Cristina Moretto more...@fbk.eu ha scritto:
Sentitevi liberi di dire tutto quello che pensate.
non sapevo del costo dell'iscrizione, secondo me è una cavolata e
scoraggerà la gente comune a partecipare
La
Il giorno Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:11:20 +0200
Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com ha scritto:
scusa ma se invece di generare le tile generi un'immagine singola può
andare bene o no?
ciao
Luca
L'immagine non verrà generata dal sw, ma verranno scaricate le tile
necessarie, in formato png, dal
Cristina Moretto ha scritto:
Sentitevi liberi di dire tutto quello che pensate.
HURRA'!
Ciao
/niubii/
Nessun virus nel messaggio in uscita.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com
Versione: 8.5.287 / Database dei virus: 270.12.9/2087 - Data di rilascio:
04/29/09 18:03:00
Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Scusate l'intervento, ma e` necessario ai fini organizzativi di alcune
persone che da non troppo vicino vorrebbero venire ad assistere alla
conferenza. Vorrei chiedere: anche un'eventuale partecipazione di un
solo giorno, senza usufruire dei pranzi, costera` 25
Il 30 aprile 2009 16.50, Cristina Moretto more...@fbk.eu ha scritto:
Ciao,
25 euro e' il minimo assoluto per garantire il funzionamento organizzativo.
Provate a confrontare con qualsiasi altro evento di tre giorni
e vedrete cifre ben differenti.
grass meeting 3 giorni, super buffet ecc ecc
Ciao a Tutti,
... mi unisco al thread,
non so se sarà utile ma nella live - DVD di gfoss, che sarà
distribuita a matera, sono installati alcuni sw tra cui
josm, mapnic osm2pg e varie utility per gps (gpsd,
gpsbabel,gpsdrive ... qualcos'altro)
c'è anche un db postgis vuoto che può essere
Il 30 aprile 2009 16.25, Alessandro De Noia
alessandro.den...@gmail.com ha scritto:
L'immagine non verrà generata dal sw, ma verranno scaricate le tile
necessarie, in formato png, dal tile server di osm (esattamente come fa
tangogps).
E' possibile scaricare immagini intere? Se si, sarebbe
Eugene and all,
Are you proposing this scheme for admin_levels?
(first row is Eugene's proposal as I understand it)
2 -- 2 - National Border (this is a worldwide convention, so there will be no
3 -- 4 - Regions
4 -- 6 - Provinces
5 -- Districts?
6 -- 8 - Cities and municipalities
8 -- 9 -
Hi maning,
Actually, I mentioned in my e-mail that I have specifically excluded
congressional districts[1] from the discussion since these do not specify
administrative boundaries. Aside from the pork barrel, the representatives
don't *administer* their territories. I think these should be tagged
I'm good with May 16.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I've posted the tagaytay mapping party announcement to several people,
mailinglist and my blog.
Please help in populating more information in the tagaytay mapping
party page to help
Hi,
I will try my best to clear my schedules on the morning of May 16 so I can
at least meet with you guys in person. Might not be able to map much as I
will be on my way to Batangas by noon. Where is our meeting place?
thanks
ed
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, maning sambale
Alright, sige lets post an announcement (blogs, OSM diary,
mailinglist, yahoogroups).
On 4/30/09, Nacario Neil nbnaca...@yahoo.com wrote:
good to go
- Original Message
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009
good to go
- Original Message
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Reviving plan(s) for Tagaytay Mapping party
Last call for confirming the date:
May 16 in Tagaytay
Is the
I suggest somewhere here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.102332lon=120.951185zoom=18layers=B000FTF
We can choose among the restaurants there for the meeting place (one
where there's beer and free wifi).
Is it too crowded during weekends?
@ ed: I posted the mapping party announcement in
Hi Marloue,
Slightly off-topic question. Since you're from Davao City, are residents of
the city adamant about insisting that Davao City is separate from Davao del
Sur? *Some* people from Zamboanga City are positively vocal (and sometimes
actually hostile!) whenever people say they are part of
Hi maning,
For your second question, well Ian and I are already converting and
implementing the borders in Metro Manila as relations (though the
admin_levels are still not finalized).
For example, see this relation for Brgy. Urdaneta in Makati:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/103686
Or
Nice! I better start adding marikina boundaries then (well until we
agree on the proposal)
cheers,
maning
still at work! midway to finishing the image processing.
For example, see this relation for Brgy. Urdaneta in Makati:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/103686
Or this relation
I created a separate thread for this to give focus to the original
topic.
What I said is actually true, in March 1, 1937 (but Araw ng Dabaw is in
March 16) Davao City is inaugurated by President Manuel L. Quezon as a
chartered city by then Davao City is separated from Davao del Sur.
Unlike Davao
I guess the DPWH is the agency that should know about these things?
I'm not actually familiar with the Manila East,South,North road system. I'm
just familiar (somewhat) with the Radial and Circumferential Road system of
Metro Manila.
As a bit of trivia, did you know that Republic Act No. 8224 (
1 - 100 di 211 matches
Mail list logo
