Re: [OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

2016-02-21 Per discussione Toby Murray
Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still out there from this user. A few examples: He tagged a random industrial building as the "South Shore Plaza" mall: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29661237 South

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

2016-02-21 Per discussione maning sambale
Edits seems legit, but I didn't check everything. Should we discuss this on the user's changeset comment? On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jim Morgan wrote: > maning sambale wrote on Monday, 22 February, 2016 11:48 AM: >> I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes:

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

2016-02-21 Per discussione Jim Morgan
maning sambale wrote on Monday, 22 February, 2016 11:48 AM: > I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes: > http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26 Appears to be an automated bot: "I use the botdidier2020 account to make corrections on

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

2016-02-21 Per discussione maning sambale
I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26 Not sure if vandalism, will dig deeper. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > I was checking out the OSM

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Clifford Snow
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > We took that to heart and pushed the minutes to our wiki page soon after > you asked about it, but I forgot to let you and the community know that we > did it. > > Our minutes are here: >

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Ian Dees
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Alyssa, > I will be out of the country with iffy internet service on Wed but would > otherwise like to join the call. Would you mind if we solicit questions > ahead of time that we could have discuss? I have two

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Steve Coast
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Steve Coast > wrote: > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the > original briefing

Re: [Talk-at] Filialen von Dayli und Schlecker

2016-02-21 Per discussione Friedrich Volkmann
On 21.02.2016 22:58, Tobias Knerr wrote: > Ein leeres Verkauflokal ist aber kein Ort, wo man etwas kaufen kann, > d.h. es erfüllt die Definition des shop-Schlüssels nicht. > > Da man für den shop-Schlüssel beliebig viele Werte erfinden kann, muss > sich ein Auswerter darauf verlassen können, dass

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Ian Dees
Hi Steve, On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the > original briefing since they’ve moved beyond that. But I’m not sure that’s > better, since it sounds like there is no documentation

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione alyssa wright
Also, I believe I linked to the document you're referring to in the wiki announcement? I could be confusing documents here... apologies if I am. > On Feb 21, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione alyssa wright
Thanks Steve. Come join us for the town hall on Wednesday! And if you have time to write a community brief as we define the student work that would be great. This was never meant to be a secret and your help in making this success is appreciated. Now have to hop on a plane. Excuse the

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione alyssa wright
Thanks Clifford. We will definitely include those questions and will make sure to publish the group's responses. Also, I think Alex had the latest update on public minutes and financials. As with all our efforts with transparency this was not are attempt to hide anything but probably lack of

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Steve Coast
Ian I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the original briefing since they’ve moved beyond that. But I’m not sure that’s better, since it sounds like there is no documentation and it’s still the same agenda. Also, I’m on the LWG and I saw the emails to the OSMF so

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Clifford Snow
Alyssa, I will be out of the country with iffy internet service on Wed but would otherwise like to join the call. Would you mind if we solicit questions ahead of time that we could have discuss? I have two question or maybe they are really concerns. One of my concern is that the legal opinions I

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Ian Dees
Hi Steve, I assure you that there is nothing secret about this process, its intentions, or the result. If you read the blog post (0) and the wiki page (1) that Alyssa posted you will find as much information as we have right now. Heck, you can even come talk to us face to face at the town hall

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione Steve Coast
It should be pointed out again that this research, based on a - still secret - brief by a company, didn’t happen via the LWG. Hopefully one day we’ll be able to build an open process using real lawyers, instead of secret agendas pushed via students. Best Steve > On Feb 21, 2016, at 3:58 PM,

[Talk-us] Legal Research

2016-02-21 Per discussione alyssa wright
Hi all, Exciting news here! The OSM US board has partnered with the cyber law clinic at Harvard University Law School for some cyber law research.  We are working with two talented young women who bring legal learning and perspective to

Re: [Talk-at] Filialen von Dayli und Schlecker

2016-02-21 Per discussione Tobias Knerr
Am 20.02.2016 18:42, schrieb Friedrich Volkmann: > On 20.02.2016 14:27, Markus Mayr wrote: >> Dem "shop=vacant" stehe ich skeptisch gegenüber. > > Ich nicht. Wir mappen, was da ist. Ein leeres Verkaufslokal ist nicht > , sondern ein leeres Verkaufslokal. Ein leeres Verkauflokal ist aber kein

Re: [Talk-cz] wikipedia:cs=* -> wikipedia=cs:*

2016-02-21 Per discussione Marián Kyral
OK, díky za info. Nakonec jsem to ošetřil tak, že pokud z wikidat nezískám obrázek, zkusím i wikipedia nebo wikimedia_commons stránku (pokud je zadána). Také jsem přidal podporu pro tag image, který také může obsahovat wikimedia_commons název souboru. Marián Dne 21.2.2016 v 22:00 Jan Dudík

[OSM-talk] Missing data in rendering database on orm

2016-02-21 Per discussione Toby Murray
I noticed something weird in the tile rendering on osm.org a couple of days ago and after looking at several things it seems that one of the rendering servers (orm) is missing data. I'm wondering if I'm the only one to see this or if anyone else has noticed something similar. What I initially

Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx

2016-02-21 Per discussione Stewart C. Russell
Hi Mojgan, > If the community is agreeable to our approach, we hope to begin this > process sometime next week, but are happy to defer if anyone feels that > there are still unanswered questions. I don't have any lingering questions. Thanks so much for doing this! Let us know if you need help

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 289

2016-02-21 Per discussione Tom Ka
Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 289 týdeníku weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/6789 Téma čísla:SOTM CZ+SK 2016 * Další dostupná data z CZ katastru nemovitostí. * 300 radarů a 739 kamer nově na Slovensku. * Návod na tovrbu map s cartodb. * OpenTopoMap verze 2.0 * Navigační systém pro Mars.

[talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

2016-02-21 Per discussione Eugene Alvin Villar
I was checking out the OSM Philippines statistics page from Pascal Neis and I noticed that almost 100,000 nodes were deleted last Friday, Feb 19. Does anybody know what happened? I'm worried if this is vandalism. http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries=Philippines ~Eugene

Re: [Talk-it] [Josm] ruotare di 10° alla volta

2016-02-21 Per discussione mircozorzo
Ciao, piccolo aggiornamento, da alcune prove sembra che con una sola linea aggiorni l'angolo in tempo reale, con più di una non lo fa ma aggiorna il dato solo quando si riseleziona il tutto. Funzionamento minimo per il mio scopo ma sufficiente. Ciao, Mirco -- View this message in context:

Re: [Talk-de] Offene Geodaten in Sachsen - Bitte noch abwarten

2016-02-21 Per discussione Joachim Kast
> möglicherweise sehe ich das zu naiv, aber wenn man einfach das > Land Sachsen in die/eine offizielle Liste der Kontributoren aufnähme? > Vielleicht reicht es dafür, ein entsprechendes Nutzerkonto anzulegen, > dem man dann ggf. auch noch die korrespondierenden Änderungssätze > zuweist... Das war

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] OSM / townlands.ie metadata

2016-02-21 Per discussione Killian Driscoll
Rory, I am using the data as part of a prehistoric stone tool raw material reference collection collected as part of a raw material provenancing (sourcing) project http://www.lithicsireland.ie/archaeology_projects_irish_lithic_landscapes_chert_provenancing.html I am setting up an online database

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat turistickou znacku pres parkoviste

2016-02-21 Per discussione Martin Ždila
2016-02-21 14:44 GMT+01:00 Petr Vejsada : > Už se řešily lyžařské trasy, které v létě neexistují, > prostě tam není žádná cesta a toto je řešení i pro ty lyžařské trasy. > Na toto pouzivam highway=piste -- Ing. Martin Ždila OZ

[Talk-at] Eilmeldung: Einladung zum Februar-Stammtisch in Graz am 22.02. (Morgen!)

2016-02-21 Per discussione Clemens Schüller
Liebe OpenStreetMap-Interessierte in der Steiermark, Fast vergessen, morgen Montag (22.02.) ist OpenStreetMap-Stammtisch Graz! Der Stammtisch findet um 18:00 im Brot & Spiele in Graz statt - Tischreservierung auf „OpenStreetMap“, wir sitzen im Kaminzimmer (Nichtraucherbereich). Zwecks Agenda

Re: [Talk-de] Offene Geodaten in Sachsen - Bitte noch abwarten

2016-02-21 Per discussione Ralf GESELLENSETTER
Hallo Jochen, ... Am 13.02.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Jochen Topf: Ich kann die Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0 nur so lesen: Wenn man die Daten irgendwie nutzt, dann muss man die Quelle (LGL bzw. halt das Land Sachsen) erwähnen. Diese Forderung "vererbt" sich bis zum Endnutzer

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz na waymarkedtrails

2016-02-21 Per discussione Zdeněk Pražák
Jak je to s rychlostí aktualizace tras na osmap.cz. Na Waymarked do bylo během cca 10 minut. Dne 20. února 2016 12:07 Petr Vozdecký napsal(a): > A osmap.cz s vrstvou turisticke mapy tve potreby nenaplni? > > vop > > -- Původní zpráva -- > Od: Zdeněk Pražák >

Re: [Talk-cz] dotaz na waymarkedtrails

2016-02-21 Per discussione Zdeněk Pražák
dnes už to zase jede jinak díky za odkaz Dne 20. února 2016 11:06 Petr Holub napsal(a): > > Nefungují mi mapy waymarkedtrails na adrese > http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ které používám > > pro kontrolu turistických tras. > > Nevíte co se děje? > > Nevim, ale vypada to, ze

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat turistickou znacku pres parkoviste

2016-02-21 Per discussione Pavel Bokr
Navic kdyz tam bude nejake to highway a nekdo bude delat sitove analyzy (jako jsem s tim parkrat blbnul ja ze jsem si highway bez ohledu na to co je kde v relacich stahnul do QGISu), tak se bude vedet ze je tam alespon moznost pruchodu. Pokud by to nebylo otagovane jako highway a bylo by jen v

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat turistickou znacku pres parkoviste

2016-02-21 Per discussione Petr Vejsada
Ahoj, určitě highway-virtual. Je to nutné k tomu, aby se cesta vůbec dostala do tabulky Mapniku, aby ji tam osm21pgsql dal. Když v tabulce nebude, nebude se mít jak vykreslit. Už se řešily lyžařské trasy, které v létě neexistují, prostě tam není žádná cesta a toto je řešení i pro ty lyžařské

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak mapovat turistickou znacku pres parkoviste

2016-02-21 Per discussione Pavel Machek
Ahoj! > > Ja resil neco podobneho aby fungovaly sitove analyzy pokud mozno co nejvice > > podle realneho sveta a zjistil jsem ze se nekde (videl jsem to na par > > mistech ve francii, da se najit v overpass turbo) pouziva pro vedeni trasy > > pro pruchod pres plochy (treba namesti - tedy pres

[OSM-talk-ie] Tellus Airborne data

2016-02-21 Per discussione Daniel Cussen
Tellus http://www.tellus.ie/data/ http://www.tellusborder.eu/NR/rdonlyres/23572FEA-0BAF-4D60-9D53-7EB71A12E3E4/0/TellusBorder_Data_Terms_Conditions_v1.pdf Any use for OSM? ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-ph] POI names with placenames

2016-02-21 Per discussione Terzeus S. Dominguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Yes, that string. Thank you! On 西元2016年02月21日 19:42, Rally de Leon wrote: > Hi Terzeus, > Are you referring to (Maysilo)? > I think it's a branch name. It's better to remove it from the name, > and add tag branch=Maysilo > > same rule applies to

Re: [talk-au] LPI Base Map road names

2016-02-21 Per discussione Mark Pulley
On 21 Feb 2016, at 10:03 pm, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/02/2016 8:49 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: >> I’ve been adding some names from the LPI base map. I was wondering how >> ‘accurate’ the names are. Most of the time the names look OK but I’ve >> noticed a couple of issues. >> >>

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] OSM / townlands.ie metadata

2016-02-21 Per discussione Rory McCann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Killian, I wrote and maintain townlands.ie. The details about what the columns mean should be on the page itself, under "Attributes". If you can ignore the "\n" that are appearing due to a translations related bug. If you'd like any further

Re: [talk-ph] POI names with placenames

2016-02-21 Per discussione Rally de Leon
Hi Terzeus, Are you referring to (Maysilo)? I think it's a branch name. It's better to remove it from the name, and add tag branch=Maysilo same rule applies to shop=convenience (like 7-Eleven), amenity=fast_food, amenity=pharmacy, and amenity=fuel where: name= (not the official business name)

Re: [talk-au] LPI Base Map road names

2016-02-21 Per discussione Andrew Harvey
On 21 February 2016 at 20:49, Mark Pulley wrote: > 2. Sometimes the name of the way on LPI is different to the existing name > in OSM. Most of the time this simply involves splitting the way where a > road name changes. I’ve noticed a few times when the road name on OSM is

Re: [Talk-es] Reunión OSM.es / IGN

2016-02-21 Per discussione pcvalverde
Hola Jorge, si lo crees conveniente yo el 29 puedo estar pues andaré por Madrid. Saludos. Pepe - Original Message - From: "Jorge Sanz" To: "Discusión en OSM" Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:25 PM Subject: [Talk-es] Reunión OSM.es /

Re: [talk-au] LPI Base Map road names

2016-02-21 Per discussione cleary
Mark, I have also noticed this. In some cases, the LPI Map has an old name that has been changed by the local shire council but it has not been updated on the LPI Map. In some cases where there is a seriously different name already in OSM, I found that seriously different name was usually wrong

Re: [talk-au] LPI Base Map road names

2016-02-21 Per discussione Warin
On 21/02/2016 8:49 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: I’ve been adding some names from the LPI base map. I was wondering how ‘accurate’ the names are. Most of the time the names look OK but I’ve noticed a couple of issues. 1. Occasionally the name of the street is mis-spelt. Sometimes it is an obvious

[talk-au] LPI Base Map road names

2016-02-21 Per discussione Mark Pulley
I’ve been adding some names from the LPI base map. I was wondering how ‘accurate’ the names are. Most of the time the names look OK but I’ve noticed a couple of issues. 1. Occasionally the name of the street is mis-spelt. Sometimes it is an obvious misspelling, but I’ve put a fixme tag on at

[talk-ph] POI names with placenames

2016-02-21 Per discussione Terzeus S. Dominguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone! I have a quick question. While updating the traffic scheme in Maysilo, I came across this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357730055#map=19/14.57715/121.03504) with its placename on the name field. Should the placename stay