the wiki has this list where you can add examples of OSM use in the media:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_in_the_media
one example from German TV (fiction, not docu) was mentioned here by Frederik
(screenshot linked):
2016-07-22 17:14 GMT+02:00 matteo ruffoni :
> Usa la mappa openstreetmap
E pare che ci sia l'attribuzione!
Ottimo!
Ciao,
C
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Grazie a tutti per le risposte sollecite!!
@Martin: come posso verificare la presenza dell'informazione dell'altezza
degli edifici in una delle cità che citi (in effetti di Berlino ricordo un
bel lavoro che era uscito un pò di tempo fà e quindi vuol dire che quel
dato da qualche parte c'è ... ).
On Friday, 22 July 2016 16:49:05 CEST cesare gerbino wrote:
> Grazie a tutti per le risposte sollecite!!
>
> @Martin: come posso verificare la presenza dell'informazione dell'altezza
> degli edifici in una delle cità che citi (in effetti di Berlino ricordo un
> bel lavoro che era uscito un pò di
Hello all,
Over the past while, I've been working on porting the
openstreetmap-carto style to vector tiles. I'm happy to have something
of beta quality to release to you all:
https://github.com/geofabrik/openstreetmap-carto-vector-tiles
Please consult the vector tiles specific readme for
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 13:25, cesare gerbino
> ha scritto:
>
> Ho provato a cercare in rete ma ho trovato solo cose relative a NewYork e
> Vancouver ...
infatti, NYC sarebbe stato la prima cosa venuta in mente. Poi in UK hanno
Il 22/07/2016 17:14, matteo ruffoni ha scritto:
> Usa la mappa openstreetmap
>
>
>
Visto il numero di mappatori da quelle parti, direi che l'attribuzione
era difficile da far "passare liscia".. :)
--
Simone Girardelli
_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
wheelchair=yes non wheelmap :)
Il giorno 22 luglio 2016 13:28, Cascafico Giovanni ha
scritto:
> Da poco mi sto interessando alle risorse per i navigatori multimodali ed
> ai relativi dati del trasporto collettivo in standard GTFS. Escludendo
> pochi virtuosi (Lecce, Milano,
Ciao, ho notato che sul Po' a Polesella il confine amministrativo è invertito
rispetto a quello che mi aspetterei, ovvero, la scritta Veneto è a sud, sul
lato dell'Emilia Romagna e viceversa, mi sembra che sia o un errore o il
contrario di quello che mi aspetterei. Sbaglio?
Ciao, Mirco
--
Nel rendering standard di openstreetmap.org, in quello umanitario è
corretto.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Confini-amministrativi-invertiti-nel-rendering-di-OSM-tp5878964p5878965.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I remember seeing an in the field history programme which was in London,
can't remember the name but it was with Dan Snow. They used a big print os OSM,
A0 plus I think.
OSM was credited in the closing titles.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Fri Jul 22 08:12:16 2016 GMT+0100, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Hi all,
I just saw the film Eye in the Sky, starring Helen Mirren and Alan
Rickman (the movie is really good), and I was pleasantly surprised to
see OpenStreetMap and its contributors get a credit in the end
credits. The surprise is partly because I do not recall seeing any map
in the film that
In attesa che arrivi l'ok all'import dalla ML imports (o che passi il
giusto tempo per pensare ad un silenzio-assenso), ho aggiunto un pò di
info sulla pagina wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Emilia_Romagna_import_numeri_civici_2016
ed ho tradotto la pagina relativa al plugin di Josm
Ciao a tutti,
sò che sia la diffusione sia la qualità dell'informazione dell'altezza
degli edifici in OSM è non così eccelsa (es. rif.
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Import-edifici-piemontesi-tt5857329.html#a5865004),
ma qualcuno conosce zone in Italia e/o anche fuori dove vi siano dati
"buoni"
Da poco mi sto interessando alle risorse per i navigatori multimodali ed ai
relativi dati del trasporto collettivo in standard GTFS. Escludendo pochi
virtuosi (Lecce, Milano, Reggio Calabria,Bologna, Trento...), ho notato un
generico sentimento di "chiusura". Il rilascio di questa informazione
Hai provato in Friuli? Non pisso far query, ma da quel che ricordo mi
sembra sia stato un buon import. diciamo la risoluzione del piano
abitazione (3mt) o forse meglio.
--
cascafico.altervista.org
twitter.com/cascafico
Il 22/lug/2016 13:27 "cesare gerbino" ha scritto:
An episode of K9 used an OpenStreetMap screen in a chase sequence.
They fumbled the credit during production, but added an IMDB credit
after LWG contacted them. :-)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1504317/companycredits?ref_=ttspec_sa_5
___
talk mailing
Ciao Cesare,
se non sbaglio Anzola dell'Emilia li ha rilasciati.
Ciao.
Lorenzo
Il ven 22 lug 2016, 13:27 cesare gerbino ha
scritto:
> Ciao a tutti,
>
> sò che sia la diffusione sia la qualità dell'informazione dell'altezza
> degli edifici in OSM è non così eccelsa (es.
Hey,
we just released OSRM 5.3.0. This releases brings some exiting changes
with regard to the 5.2 series. Most importantly we now have support
for turn lanes. Thanks to all contributors of this release. Our
special thanks goes to Michael Krasnyk for contributing various bug
fixes and ARM
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 14:46, Stefan Jäger ha
> scritto:
>
> My question now is: if we enrich our data (with only underlying attributes,
> no geometry from OSM at all) with such a process using OSM data, is this then
> a produced work (or a
Johan C wrote:
> It's quite simple: as long as MAPS.ME operates in either the white or
> the grey area of the license it's perfectly fine what they are doing.
Um, no, that's precisely what "grey area" _doesn't_ mean.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
多田さん、みなさん、
京都の山下です。こんにちわ。
OSC 京都に参画いただき、ありがとうございます。
7/29 の展示は 11:00 - 17:00 です。
11:00 にスタンバイできていれば十分です。
ずっとブースにいないといけないかといえば、
全くそのようなことはなく
隣のブースに私がいますし、
木村さんにも応援に来ていただけるとお聞きしています。
誰かがブースを見ているように調整しながら
OSC を楽しんでください
// 私なんて、毎年ブースそっちのけで OSC を楽しんでます(笑
京都のイベントですので、皆さんが身近に感じていただけるように
Thanks fort he quick answer,
Actually I did consult the mentioned guideline , however, I could not really
relate it 100% to my use case.
That's what I hope for some clarification here.
Stefan
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
FYI
ALCE Samuel Paul,
Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Field Data Coordinator @ DAI / USAID
Géo-Information Specialist (GIS)
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team member
OpenStreetMap contributor in Haiti
OSM username: ALCE Samuel Paul
Cell: (509) 4894-2175 / 4638-4875 / 4289-7651
Skype: samuelalce
山下さん
有り難う御座います。
お隣なんですね、安心しました。
では、まったり布教活動に勤しみます。
-元のメッセージ-
差出人: yasunari
宛先: talk-ja ; tadanet3
送信日時: 2016/7/22, 金, 22:53
件名: Re: [OSM-ja] 今後のオープンソースカンファレンスの日程について
多田さん、みなさん、
京都の山下です。こんにちわ。
OSC
Sorry I'm not commenting everything, but just the parts I find important. (See
below)
> 22 июля 2016 г., в 1:35, Christoph Hormann написал(а):
>
> But neither does it become collective. And if you re-read my last
> mail - i clearly made the argument based on the license
Hallo zusammen,
ich kümmere mich aktuell darum, eine explizite Nutzungserlaubnis
bezüglich der Odbl zu bekommen und die Möglichkeit, das
Ausgangsshapefile zur Einsicht zur Verfügung zu stellen.
Ich melde mich, wenn es diesbezüglich Neuigkeiten gibt.
Bis dahin,
Viele Grüße
Lisa
Hi Stefan, and thanks for writing to this mailing list.
Your case is not much different from geocoding, when you borrow some attributes
(addresses, or in your case, POI or landuse tags) from OSM and put it into a
proprietary database. That would clearly make a derived database out of your
Bonjour,
Je revient la dessus parce que je trouve ça important.
J'ai regardé il y a environ 430 communes avec un nom différent de celui de
leur admin_centre vous pouvez les voir là :
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/carte-des-communes-dont-ladmin_centre-a-un-nom-dif_95198
je les ai classe en 3
On Friday 22 July 2016, Ilya Zverev wrote:
>
> Wait that doesn't seem right. You cannot violate guidelines because
> they are examples and explanations, not restrictions or a law. And
> then, when the guidelines say a dataset "may be" considered
> derivative, it doesn't say it is derivative (or
Hello all,
Pandan nou nan GWO DISKISYON ann gade koman mond lan ap
evolye kite nou jisss deye net. :( Sa fem mal...
ANTOUKA ann enjoy link sa ansanm, ann gade koman OSM ap grandi ak travay
tout kontribyab yo...
NB: Nou tout ki la kontribye a jefo sila... nou chak se youn nan
On 7/22/2016 12:28 AM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
Consider a simpler experiment. I remove nodes based on an obscure algorithm. I
then publish the rest of the database and a list of removed nodes under an open
license. Do I have to open the algorithm?
The database would be a derivative database and
Hi all,
I just saw the film Eye in the Sky, starring Helen Mirren and Alan
Rickman (the movie is really good), and I was pleasantly surprised to
see OpenStreetMap and its contributors get a credit in the end
credits. The surprise is partly because I do not recall seeing any map
in the film that
You are starting to derive the licensing terms from intentions, and not the
actual process or usage. Which basically says, if the community accepts this
way of judging: however you use our data, if we don't like what you do with it,
you would have to stop. And that is definitely not a FOSS
Saludos!
Ya sabeis de mi inquietud por ir un "poco más allá" en algunas cosejas. Si
hace un tiempo me dió por "idear" algunas etiquetas históricas para OSM
(una de las posibilidades para añadir una dimensión temporal a OSM) y que
podeis encontrar aquí
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:28:23PM +0900, Shu Higashi wrote:
> > 2.6 踏切
> > railway=crossing は遮断機なし踏切
> > railway=level_crossing は遮断機あり踏切
> > という使い分けがされているように思われるのですがいかがでしょうか。
>
> 上の2つは遮断機の有無という面もあるのかもしれませんが
> 私自身は歩行者用と車用、ととらえていました。
> 今回、車が通る踏切の両サイドにも歩道のラインを引く
> という話なのですが、踏切の場合、遮断機や警報機は車も人も
>
ikiyaさん、コメントありがとうございます。
> 概要ガイドラインを共有できて歩道マッピングに着手しやすくなると思います。
> 大筋を共有して、詳細な点やタイムリーに上がってくる課題については
> 適時、意見交換できれば良いと考えます。
はい。そんな形で進められればと思います。
> 以下は東さんの内容になかった話題ですが、
> 歩道マッピング(歩行者の動線を含む)を考えるとき、footway=sidewalkなどとentranceキーの関わりは必要だと考えています。
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:entrance
>
Bonjour,
Le Centre de Ressources des Hauts Pays Alpins vous invite pour nouvelle
une cartopartie saixy mercredi 27 juillet au Saix à partir de 9h30.
« Poursuite de l'aventure cartographique so saixy !
Rendez vous mercredi 27 juillet au Saix à partir de 9h30 pour découvrir
et compléter la
muramotoさん、コメントありがとうございます。
> 2.2 点字ブロック
> tactile_paving=*をタグづけする場合、点字ブロックが歩道に「ない」ことを確認できたら、tactile_paving=noを明示的に付けていただけたらと思います。
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:tactile_paving
> 点字ブロックが「ない」ということも重要な情報であると思いますので。
そうですね。
無いと困るところは明示的に無いとしといた方が良いですね。
> 2.6 踏切
> railway=crossing
On Friday 22 July 2016, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> You are starting to derive the licensing terms from intentions, and
> not the actual process or usage. Which basically says, if the
> community accepts this way of judging: however you use our data, if
> we don't like what you do with it, you would have
Ilya Zverev wrote:
> Let's consider another use case. An application that shows OSM map,
> and on top of it shows 1 mln of user points. A users has an option to
> hide the OSM map underneath proprietary points, with a radius of 1
> km. Does in that moment when a user clickes the options, the
>
Dear all from legal-talk,
We have the idea of using OSM data for an enrichment process in order to
improve the attributive information of proprietary building footprints.
Let me briefly explain, what the purpose of using OSM for our enrichment
process is.
We are developing a data product for
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 03:19:30PM +0900, Shu Higashi wrote:
>
> 1.トレース方法
> 1.1 基盤地図1/2500
> 1.1.1 車道に沿った普通の歩道
> 明示的に歩道が判別できる部分をトレースします。
> highway=footway
> footway=sidewalk
敷地の公開部分が歩道扱いになっているものは、
sidewalkにすべきでしょうか、pedestrianにすべきでしょうか。
> 1.1.3 歩道の進行方向
> 歩行者にとって、特に指定がない限り歩道の進行方向は決まっていません
>
It's quite simple: as long as MAPS.ME operates in either the white or the
grey area of the license it's perfectly fine what they are doing.
Op 22 jul. 2016 12:04 p.m. schreef "Richard Fairhurst" :
> Ilya Zverev wrote:
> > Let's consider another use case. An application
44 matches
Mail list logo