On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:38 AM Alexey Z via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Let me raise a question/appeal about stop_area relation. PTv2 is very
> disputable and imperfect, so I tried to touch a narrow and practical aspect
> to solve a specific problem. I rea
No. Let the relations do their job.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 8:16 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> In the USA bus stops (flag stops) are located for the most part at
> named intersections, that is at where the street
>
> sign is.
>
>so you DO
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:27 PM Michael Reichert
wrote:
> Hi Tijmen,
>
> Am 20.11.19 um 23:08 schrieb Tijmen Stam:
> > In the Netherlands, there are no train route numbers like this.
> > Internally (and among hobbyists) we speak of a "series 2900" train which
> > goes from Enkhuizen to Maastricht
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:32 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> that OSM,
>
> is a product of the united kingdom,
>
> are there any united states bus editors out there ?
>
I'm here working on Tulsa Transit. I'd actually be surprised if there
weren't at
gt; >>
> >> It's a bit messy, so I hope they'll change that at some point in the
> >> future.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> and the stops in Brussels could simply use ref, but I don't think we
> >> know their identifiers.
> >
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Dalley wrote:
> I am using GO-Sync, gtfs-osm-sync, to synchronize data for AC Transit.
>
> For AC Transit, the gtfs_id, or stop_code, can be used to identify the
> stop. That's the number on the sign, and can be as a phone code.
>
> For example,
>
> stop co
Spot check against Tulsa Transit seems to suggest that this is matching a
dump of the GTFS stops. Use caution with this data if you're going to try
to map from this, as the official GTFS is known to be wrong in Tulsa.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Guertin
wrote:
> The (US) Department o
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Hans De Kryger
wrote:
> If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the
> bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways?
>
I would advise against this; and instead use a separate relation for each
direction of a route as it greatly s
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 2016-06-21 00:27, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Stephen Sprunk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-06-20 16:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, S
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 2016-06-20 16:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Sprunk
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The situation with GTFS data itself is so bad that Google stopped
>> offe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 2016-06-20 02:07, Roland Olbricht wrote:
>
>> There had been a group that was very vocal for making a textbook
>> example of design by committee, and the result is now known as
>> "approved public transport scheme". They did not ask for
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I see no reason to group objects in stop_area_groups, unless maybe if
> there is a name or ref that only makes sense to give to a collection of
> stops, and they all have different names. But if you are talking about a
> station, we have the
Here in Tulsa (and apparently Wichita as well, along with Cherokee Nation
Transit, Kibois Area Transit System, and presumably most midwestern
agencies) have a concept of "deviation area" on their routes. In such a
case, you can be picked up or dropped off anyplace they can fit a bus
(usually a 15-
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Jo wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> How do passengers know where to go and stand if there are no physical
> markers? I think a bus stop should be able to be defined by the fact the
> driver knows where to halt and the passengers know where to wait.
>
In our case, this is p
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jo wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I see what you mean now. I dropped the forward/backward roles on the ways
> a few years ago. Recently I thought that they should be a help for the
> sorting algorithm, but your example proves they aren't.
>
Well, they do help for sorting
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Jo wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> It helps, when you select a subset of ways and only let JOSM sort those
> automatically.
>
True, but if you've had to edit a section of a dogleg to add another, sub
dogleg, this breaks, too. The ground truth is breaking the tool.
> Can
Is there an easy way to map these? In JOSM, I run into problems with
trying to sort when I edit that pretty much complicates the situation to
the point where I end up having to start over if I get the order wrong, and
the public transport plugin isn't the most stable thing in the world.
Starting t
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, stevea wrote:
> And here is what I've learned.
>
> This is tedious work, especially a state at at time. It is slow, but that
> is because it is a whole (large) state. This is not impossibly large work,
> not by a long shot. Yet for one person, a whole state is
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Secondly, GTFS is already a good, widely used, open format for transit
> schedules. Introducing a new set of tags for this stuff in OSM would
> be like reinventing the wheel. In many cases GTFS data is provided and
> kept up-to-date by the
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:03:59 +0200, Michał Borsuk wrote:
> Just a technical note, we'd need a server with some proper Forum-like
> software, so that posts like the one below could be pinned.
Why not just update the wiki? Why needlessly complicate things with a
forum?
_
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:31:53 +0200, Michał Borsuk wrote:
> On 28 July 2010 11:26, Ed Loach wrote:
>
>> Something like http://forum.openstreetmap.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Definitely. Forum is way better than a mailing list, a threaded forum is
> even better.
[citation needed]. There's nothing a forum
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:59:53 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> For tagging the status of rail infrastructure there are in use:
>
> I usually think it's good to look at existing practice by others.
>
> On USGS maps, and in US legal usage:
>
> "out of service": rails still exist, but no trains. show
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:56:22 +0200, Heiko Jacobs wrote:
> So this words don't satisfy me ...
> I'm searching something like "traceless", "virtual", "very, really very
> abandoned", ...
>
> Does anybody has an idea?
How about omitting the line entirely? If it's no longer part of the
ground trut
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:45 +0100, Peter Childs wrote:
> 2009/9/18 Ed Loach :
> > Peter asked:
> >
> >> Anyone got a Zoom Layer beyond level 19 so I can see what I'm
> >> doing
> >> and pace the station out..
> >
> > JOSM. I think you can just keep zooming in. It also displays the
> > length (a
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 23:56 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote:
> However DisneyLand monorail http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/22942763
> does have oneway = yes , but again is a closed loop single way.
That would be about right: I seem to recall that they don't have an (on
board) means of backing u
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:02 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frankie
> Roberto wrote:
> > Fulfilling a very small niche, I've added a (very short) page for monorails
> > (in the UK): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_monorails
>
> we should build more mon
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:34 +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
> I think the conclusion is that have OSM crawling over the data is
> going to do it a lot of good (and cost the councils nothing).
Suddenly you're giving me ideas... I wonder how receptive the State of
Oregon would be to putting GPS tracke
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 12:18 +0100, Richard Mann wrote:
> While I like the idea of marking individual railway tracks as separate ways,
> I foresee a problem for the renderers if we don't tell them how many tracks
> are adjacent. If a renderer makes a distinction between tracks=1 and
> tracks=2, a
Thomas Wood wrote:
> 2009/6/2 Sebastian Schwarz :
>> Hi!
>>
>> Well, I have been en-route the last days and thus did not have time to
>> respond to any of the numerous mails covering almost all aspects of
>> the new proposal relating to public transport. But I see the
>> discussion sort of loosing
29 matches
Mail list logo
