Michał Borsuk michal.borsuk at gmail.com writes:
Is it possible to add a way to a relation twice with Potlatch?
Out of 80 lines I manage, I have such a situation once (not a way, but
a bus stop, actually). Is it an issue in your area?
Such route existed in Prague (#212), but was eliminated
On 02/02/2011 02:42 PM, Jo wrote:
Is it possible to add a way to a relation twice with Potlatch?
Out of 80 lines I manage, I have such a situation once (not a way, but
a bus stop, actually). Is it an issue in your area?
LMB
___
Talk-transit
Here the buses travel over the same stretch of asphalt quite often.
Usually back and forth (what you call a spoon). Sometimes twice in the
same direction (on a roundabout with one stop that serves both
directions, so the bus that would exit the roundabout on the first
exit, now goes around to
On 01/28/2011 02:45 PM, Jo wrote:
Yes that's one option. I'm a bit reluctant to put in separate
relations for each direction unless someone actually gives me a
compelling reason to do so. I already have some ways with more than 20
relations, and I don't really want to double that
Potlatch 2 includes a display of the ways/nodes in order, and you can
move them about, but it doesn't currently tell you anything about the
member, except the id and the role (so it's pretty much a list of
random numbers).
I've raised a ticket requesting at least the member's name to be
2011/2/2 Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com:
On 01/28/2011 02:45 PM, Jo wrote:
Yes that's one option. I'm a bit reluctant to put in separate
relations for each direction unless someone actually gives me a
compelling reason to do so. I already have some ways with more than 20
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to add a way to a relation twice with Potlatch? And is
it possible to show that 1 way is part of a relation multiple times?
Yes. Oxford Bus route 9 now has a certain section of the Green Road
roundabout twice.
Richard
On 27.01.2011 22:06, Michael von Glasow wrote:
You can find the proposal at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Simplified_Public_Transport_Scheme
Constructive feedback and suggestions are welcome and can be sent to the
list or left on the proposal's discussion page.
It
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Michael von Glasow
mich...@vonglasow.com wrote:
Following the call for a better proposal, Tiziano, Oscar and I have drafted
up a simple proposal. It is based on how we have mapped the public transport
networks in our cities (Padova, Ferrara and Milan), with some
2011/1/28 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Michael von Glasow
mich...@vonglasow.com wrote:
Following the call for a better proposal, Tiziano, Oscar and I have
drafted
up a simple proposal. It is based on how we have mapped the public
Yes that's one option. I'm a bit reluctant to put in separate
relations for each direction unless someone actually gives me a
compelling reason to do so. I already have some ways with more than 20
relations, and I don't really want to double that number without good
reason.
Following the call for a better proposal, Tiziano, Oscar and I have
drafted up a simple proposal. It is based on how we have mapped the
public transport networks in our cities (Padova, Ferrara and Milan),
with some improvements that came up during this discussion.
Our approach was to keep it
route_ref does not seem obsolete to me. True, if the relation is defined, it
can be determined from that by routers. But as long as that hasn't happened,
this is the information that a mapper can take not of in the field.
Then afterwards, it can help to add the appropriate stops to the route
On 01/27/2011 11:37 PM, Jo wrote:
route_ref does not seem obsolete to me. True, if the relation is
defined, it can be determined from that by routers. But as long as
that hasn't happened, this is the information that a mapper can take
not of in the field.
That's basically what I meant - you
On 23.01.2011 15:01, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Any updates from the wiki front?
I have started something:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cleanup/Public_transport
I'll need your help with this, so feel free to edit and discuss.
cheers
ant
On 15.01.2011 14:46, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Yes! I've been raising this issue here, it may have died among other
arguments: An overhaul and update of the documentation is more important
than pushing the new schema.
Do you have the resources to lead this project of cleaning the mess with
wiki
How about you, and the few of us who understand why the proposal is a mere
nonsense, develop a better proposal? We seem to share the understanding of
the flaws; a new proposal may lead to a secession, which is the ugliest
thing possible, but I am not sure we can continue to improve the
Hi,
On 14.01.2011 09:58, Michał Borsuk wrote:
How about you, and the few of us who understand why the proposal is a
mere nonsense, develop a better proposal? We seem to share the
understanding of the flaws; a new proposal may lead to a secession,
which is the ugliest thing possible, but I am
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:46 AM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
Example: If a housenumber is located exactly on the corner of two
streets (and no street name attached to it), an algorithm could only guess
which street it belongs to. Probably similar ambiguities are possible for
bus stops as
Am 14.01.2011 12:46, schrieb ant:
Hi,
On 14.01.2011 09:58, Michał Borsuk wrote:
How about you, and the few of us who understand why the proposal is a
mere nonsense, develop a better proposal? We seem to share the
understanding of the flaws; a new proposal may lead to a secession,
which is the
On 14.01.2011 14:29, Richard Mann wrote:
If I were ever to map it, I'd put it in as a separate relation and put
days of operation in the two variants (do we have a tag for that?). I
I've seen people use opening_hours on route relations.
might also want a tag on the relation such as
On 14.01.2011 21:13, Michał Borsuk wrote:
3. lack of the need in the majority of cases (other cases: roles should
be enough*)
See my other posts.
Frankly not sure which one. Do you care to summarize what you mean?
I had my posting from 18:53 CET in mind, it's about getting a platform's
On 14 January 2011 18:56, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14.01.2011 14:29, Richard Mann wrote:
If I were ever to map it, I'd put it in as a separate relation and put
days of operation in the two variants (do we have a tag for that?). I
I've seen people use opening_hours on route
On 14.01.2011 21:28, Michał Borsuk wrote:
I will elaborate on the complexity of timetable datasets, with actual
examples, if time permits. One question here, are you developing this
software as an academic assignment? If so, in which journal would you like
to publish?
Are you addressing me?
...Also, it is quite unlikely that a stop is served in only one direction
whereas the road it resides on is used in both. For stops that are situated
at a segment that is served only in one direction, it is clear in what
direction the stop is used, isn't it..
Actually, this is not unlikely
25 matches
Mail list logo
