Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread James Mast
The 27th? Damn. I thought it was going to go read-only on the 1st... At least that's what I've been telling people who I've been contacting to see if they will accept the new CT (which is still being somewhat successful geting at least 2-3 people a day to accept). Ugh. - James Date: Wed,

Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread Toby Murray
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: The 27th? Damn.  I thought it was going to go read-only on the 1st...  At least that's what I've been telling people who I've been contacting to see if they will accept the new CT (which is still being somewhat

Re: [Talk-us] We have less than a week left to remap!

2012-03-22 Thread stevea
I don't think this has been reposted to talk-us yet. According to the latest license change rebuild plan, the database will enter read-only mode on March 27th for the license rebuild: http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan It has been stated that it is a GOAL to pull the plug on

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
Importing data correctly is hard, especially the first time. I'm glad you've come to the list. I'd be curious to know if you didn't notice the warnings on the wiki to contact the community first; I've gone ahead and added the warning banner to the ogr2osm, shp2osm, shp-to-osm, and shape2osm pages

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: If there are duplicated ways and nodes, perhaps reverting is the best option? Unfortunately I'd agree that reverting these changesets will be the easiest

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Marc Zoss
I briefly downloaded all sby:bldgtype-tagged ways and relation of Maryland through the overpass-api. Then removed the ones having only a sby:bldgtype tag, run the validator and deleted the duplicated nodes and ways. This would result in a changeset to remove the roughly 71'000 duplicates nodes

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Marc Zoss marcz...@gmail.com wrote: I briefly downloaded all sby:bldgtype-tagged ways and relation of Maryland through the overpass-api. Then removed the ones having only a sby:bldgtype tag, run the validator and deleted the duplicated nodes and ways. This

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Chamberlain
Josh and Marc, Thank you! I apologize that I'm unable to speak the OSM language as well as everyone, I'm working on it :) I posted on the Salisbury, Maryland Import page that Josh created to give more detail about my uploads. I didn't really think that I created so many duplicates, because I

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Marc Zoss
Nick and Josh thanks for the clarification on your upload strategy. With previous large uploads I have experience the same behaviour resulting in massive dupes. So I guess it is not a conversion issue. If you want me to commit the remove duplicates changeset, I can do so. But you will have to

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Mike N
On 3/22/2012 9:12 AM, Nick Chamberlain wrote: I was getting a proxy error and the uploads were timing out when I attempted to upload the entire batch. This is a common problem with uploading large changesets with JOSM, where upload failures result in a partial upload. We're hesitant to put

[Talk-us] Duplicates in data uploads (using JOSM) -- was: Re: [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
With previous large uploads I have experience the same behaviour resulting in massive dupes. So I guess it is not a conversion issue. I don't have experience with conversions nor (mass) imports -- but I _have_ had massive dupes problems a number of times when uploading larger amounts of data with

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Chamberlain
Mark, if you could commit the remove duplicates changeset, that'd be great. I will do my best to check if the issues are resolved, and will gladly accept any guidance on the best ways to do so. Thanks. - Nick -Original Message- From: Marc Zoss [mailto:marcz...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicates in data uploads (using JOSM) -- was: Re: [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Chamberlain
Jaakko, Thank you for the explanation. I will tweak my chunk sizes further next time. I did so before, but they were still fairly large and took a few hours per upload. Reducing them might take longer, but if that fixes duplication I will do that. Thanks. - Nick From: Jaakko

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Nick Chamberlain nchamberl...@ci.salisbury.md.us wrote: Mark, if you could commit the remove duplicates changeset, that'd be great.  I will do my best to check if the issues are resolved, and will gladly accept any guidance on the best ways to do so.  Thanks.

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Uploads to City of Salisbury, MD

2012-03-22 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Nick Chamberlain nchamberl...@ci.salisbury.md.us wrote: Mark, if you could commit the remove duplicates changeset, that'd be great.  I will do my best to check if the issues are resolved, and