2013/6/17 Anthony o...@inbox.org
It's not about mapping the sign, it's about mapping the neighborhood based
on the sign.
We don't map speed limit signs, we map the speed limits on the roads based
on the signs.
where do you get this from? We are indeed mapping speed limits signs
Why is the US local chapter not running a tile server that renders shields and
concurrencies? The tagging has been stable forever. The code has been working
for years. Even a hacked demo ( now offline) was running for years before
that.
Stop waiting for the London tile server to give a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Why is the US local chapter not running a tile server that renders shields
and concurrencies? The tagging has been stable forever. The code has been
working for years. Even a hacked demo ( now offline) was running for
Richard - we were discussing this topic during the mappy hour yesterday and
came to the same conclusion! We should have a shields style. What needs to
be done? I am willing to put in time but can't connect all the dots myself.
I will loop in Ian and see if we can get this running.
On Tue, Jun
Oh there you are Ian :)
Well I guess I am stepping up but I will need help!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Richard - we were discussing this topic during the mappy hour yesterday
and came to the same conclusion! We should have a shields style. What
* Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com [2013-06-18 08:07 -0500]:
Because no one's stepped up to do it!
Okay, I should probably put my toes in here. I can spend this weekend
cleaning up my code (for http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/ ) and maybe
try to get it running on the US server, if there's
* Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com [2013-06-17 22:19 -0400]:
If the way is part of relation that has a ref, and the way itself does
not have a ref, then the relation ref should propagate to the way.
Note that the conventions for ref tags are different for relations and
ways. A way
I did spend some time trying to set up Phil's code myself for eventual
deployment to the osm-us server. I got a good chunk of the way there but
ran into some problems. I'll see if I can put some more time into it now
that I'm home again.
Toby
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Richard Weait
Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would need to
be done. I can't make tonight but tomorrow early evening (like, 6PM MDT)
would work. Ian, Phil, Toby, are you around then?
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I did spend some
* Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org [2013-06-18 10:40 -0600]:
Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would need to
be done. I can't make tonight but tomorrow early evening (like, 6PM MDT)
would work. Ian, Phil, Toby, are you around then?
That's 8pm for me, which might
Great. I am just catching up on SOTM US talks and watching yours. Enjoying
it a lot!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org [2013-06-18 10:40 -0600]:
Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would need
to
A related question - do we have a clear idea of route relation completeness
in the US? Looking at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_Relations
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations
This look pretty well organized, but I know how wikis can
On 6/18/2013 1:21 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
This look pretty well organized, but I know how wikis can be deceiving
like that.
Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
states, there are no State Route relation pages.
Hi,
this year I was at SOTM-US for the first time, and immediately
thereafter travelled to the German-language version of FOSS4G, the
FOSSGIS conference. There were lots of similarities - but also big
contrasts. Below is a personal comparison that might or might not be
useful or
Frederik,
Thank you for this valuable feedback, in particular regarding the sprints.
I feel very badly about how the sprints went, and I want to go into
detail why, and what I'm going to try to do next year about them.
First, I want to say that for those people who were calling this a
hack day,
The USGS topographic map layer isn't appearing for me as a background in
Potlatch. I'm looking at it in this general area:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.18018lon=-85.57084zoom=15layers=M
Is this layer turned off / on the fritz / just very slow?
- Ben Miller
It would appear that the crossdomain.xml file Flash is expecting to be
there isn't.
I'm trying to get it to show up now...
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Ben Miller bborkmil...@gmail.com wrote:
The USGS topographic map layer isn't appearing for me as a background in
Potlatch. I'm looking
Fixed the crossdomain.xml problem as best I can tell, but now seeing that
there's just not any data there. Looks like the USGS is returning white
tiles for zooms 13 in that area.
http://tile.openstreetmap.us/usgs_scanned_topos/preview.html#13/45.1929/-85.5724
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Ian
Hi,
Frederik,
Thanks for the compare contrast and I am happy you have enjoyed SOTM US.
I am very happy you could make it and that you got a chance to (re-)connect
with members of the US and international community.
I have attended a FOSSGIS or two and can relate to your experience. They
are
19 matches
Mail list logo
