Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Paul Johnson
Try looking in the US:OK and US:OK:Turnpike networks. Pretty verigated mix of divided, undivided and intermittently divided routes there. On Nov 18, 2013 3:05 PM, "Jason Remillard" wrote: > Hi, > > As a meta comment. I have been trying to follow all of the US > route/shield discussions over the

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Paul Johnson
I'm willing to extend this to any route whose endpoints are undivided. Seems the problem we're ultimately dealing with are situations where a route ends with a median of some type. On Nov 18, 2013 2:42 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > 2013/11/18 Nathan Mills > >> I'm still confused as to why

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Nov 18, 2013 7:24 PM, "Evin Fairchild" wrote: > > Re the comment by Nathan: “I'm still confused as to why the consumers of a relation can't use the forward/backward roles…” The forward/backward roles only make sense on one-way roads. Individual members of relations that are one way. Makes se

[Talk-us] Editithon Results

2013-11-21 Thread Clifford Snow
Has there been any published results of the last editathon? -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Editithon Results

2013-11-21 Thread Martijn van Exel
Not that I know of, let me ask if any were captured systematically. cc John Novak who did this for the earlier edit-a-thons. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Has there been any published results of the last editathon? > > -- > Clifford > > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human t

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Martijn van Exel
The patch has been merged into master and should make it into the next iD release. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > That is a really good and interesting point, Chris. I just confirmed > that iD leaves the north / south / east / west roles alone when > reversing a way.

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Martijn van Exel
That is a really good and interesting point, Chris. I just confirmed that iD leaves the north / south / east / west roles alone when reversing a way. Neither does Potlatch (although Potlatch does not seem to actually allow you to reverse a way, just to flip the oneway= between 1 and -1). At least i

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

2013-11-21 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Reading through this I see that most are in favor of avoiding dividing > relations more than necessary: no separate relations for directions, > especially not if the geometry is the same for both. > > That leaves the question of how to tag