Alex,
This looks promising and I'm interested to see where the community goes
with it. I just briefly looked at the data schema and there are some useful
attributes that would make for some great information. I'll look at it a
bit more before I take a position.
Kindly,
Elliott
On Mon Jan 19
In that case, it sounds like the penndot blade sign refs are similar to
Oregon's highways as opposed to routes, in which I have to wonder where
the added value is in having these even mapped.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:48 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Well, with keeping it as
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2015-01-16 07:52, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm very much in favor of PA instead of SR for
On 2015-01-19 01:30, Minh Nguyen wrote:
On 2015-01-19 00:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
What distinguishes the various networks that a given agency maintains?
For our purposes, I think
US:PA:Turnpike (possibly only one member?)
There are 3 routes in that (not counting the mainline PA Turnpike relation).
PA Turnpike 43
PA Turnpike 66
PA Turnpike 576 (Future I-576 maybe when it connects to I-79 in 2019, or maybe
in the distant future when it connects to PA Turnpike 43)
There
They all already have those types of relations.
And the master relation for all of them is here: Pennsylvania Turnpike Network
(3075726) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3075726
-James
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:49:59 -0600
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC:
Alright, in that case, I'm throwing my support into retagging ref=SR
in Pennsylvania to ref:penndot=* en masse, since it's at least an edge-case
useful tag to those familiar with the system but not particularly useful or
obvious for the average user.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:28 AM, James
Come help map a new park:
http://www.meetup.com/OSM-Colorado/events/219878946/
Steve
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 2015-01-19 00:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
What distinguishes the various networks that a given agency maintains?
For our purposes, I think we're most interested in:
1. Significant
Not totally sure that relation even needs to exist given that you can fire
off an XAPI request for everything in the US:PA:Turnpike network without it
anyway, but good to know that it's already sorted. But yeah, back to the
point, I think the refs that appear on the blade signs belongs in
Fully agree with you there Paul. Just have to watch out for those few 'rare'
exceptions to the rule I mentioned before for the future 'ref:penndot' tag
where some mainline route have different 'SR' numbers in the white boxes.
-James
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:15:38 -0600
From:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2015-01-19 00:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
What distinguishes the various networks that a given
OK, so three, possibly four, routes that could have US:PA:Turnpike
relations.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:45 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
US:PA:Turnpike (possibly only one member?)
There are 3 routes in that (not counting the mainline PA Turnpike
relation).
PA Turnpike 43
13 matches
Mail list logo
